Alibaba Cloud Int.
48 indexed models
- Headquarters
Singapore- Server regions
- Singapore
China - Model types
- 45 text, 2 video, 1 transcription
Same-model provider benchmark
Alibaba Cloud Int. vs io.net: LLM provider comparison
Compare Alibaba Cloud Int. and io.net on 3 exact shared text models. ProviderBench keeps speed, price, and catalog coverage separate so naturally faster model catalogs cannot distort the result.
io.net
3 indexed models
- Headquarters
United States- Server regions
- N/a
- Model types
- 3 text
At a glance
Metric winners
There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.
Fastest on shared models
1.32× typical advantage
3 exact models with complete recent speed data
Lowest token cost
$1.166 / 1M
3 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix
Most models available
48 models
Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities
Shared-model benchmark summary
| Metric | Alibaba Cloud Int. | io.net |
|---|---|---|
| Typical 500-token response | 17.65 s | 34.11 s |
| Typical response start | 1.52 s | 1.79 s |
| Typical output speed | 31.0 tok/s | 15.0 tok/s |
| Blended token price | $1.166 / 1M | $1.2455 / 1M |
| Typical route uptime | 99.67% | 99.27% |
Visual comparison
Price and performance charts
Estimated seconds using recent median response-start and output-speed data. Lower is better.
Alibaba Cloud Int. has the lower typical same-model response ratio across 3 measured models.
USD per 1 million tokens using a 1,000-input/500-output mix. Lower is better.
Alibaba Cloud Int. has the lower typical price ratio across 3 priced shared models.
| Model | Alibaba Cloud Int. | io.net |
|---|---|---|
 GLM 5.2Winner · Alibaba Cloud Int. z-ai/glm-5.2 | Alibaba Cloud Int.
| io.net
|
 Qwen3.6 27BWinner · Alibaba Cloud Int. qwen/qwen3.6-27b | Alibaba Cloud Int.
| io.net
|
 DeepSeek V4 FlashWinner · Alibaba Cloud Int. deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash | Alibaba Cloud Int.
| io.net
|
A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated . Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.
Alibaba Cloud Int. vs io.net analysis
How Alibaba Cloud Int. and io.net compare for AI inference
Alibaba Cloud Int. and io.net share 3 indexed text models, including GLM 5.2, Qwen3.6 27B, DeepSeek V4 Flash. Alibaba Cloud Int. has the stronger typical response-time result on the directly measured set.
Same-model speed evidence
3 shared models currently have complete response-start and output-speed measurements on both providers. The speed comparison uses per-model ratios before taking the median, so naturally faster model catalogs do not improve the result.
Token pricing on one workload
3 shared models have complete input and output prices on both providers. Prices use the same 1,000-input/500-output-token mix and are normalized to one million tokens for readability.
Catalog and deployment differences
Alibaba Cloud Int. has 48 indexed models and lists 2 published server regions; io.net has 3 models and lists no regions. Verify data residency, privacy terms, limits, and production latency directly before choosing.
Related same-model benchmarks
Compare with other providers
Explore qualified alternatives with the most shared measured models. Recommendations include comparisons for both Alibaba Cloud Int. and io.net.
Alibaba Cloud Int. vs DeepInfra
17 shared model benchmarks
io.net vs Morph
3 shared model benchmarks
Alibaba Cloud Int. vs NovitaAI
16 shared model benchmarks
io.net vs SiliconFlow
3 shared model benchmarks
Alibaba Cloud Int. vs Venice
11 shared model benchmarks
io.net vs Weights & Biases
3 shared model benchmarks