Skip to content
ProviderBench home

Same-model provider benchmark

Alibaba Cloud Int. vs NextBit: LLM provider comparison

Compare Alibaba Cloud Int. and NextBit on 4 exact shared text models. ProviderBench keeps speed, price, and catalog coverage separate so naturally faster model catalogs cannot distort the result.

Alibaba Cloud Int.

48 indexed models

Headquarters
Singapore
Server regions
SingaporeChina
Model types
45 text, 2 video, 1 transcription

NextBit

13 indexed models

Headquarters
Spain
Server regions
Spain
Model types
13 text

At a glance

Metric winners

There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.

Fastest on shared models

Alibaba Cloud Int.

3.18× typical advantage

4 exact models with complete recent speed data

Lowest token cost

NextBit

$0.3367 / 1M

4 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix

Most models available

Alibaba Cloud Int.

48 models

Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities

Shared-model benchmark summary

MetricAlibaba Cloud Int.NextBit
Typical 500-token response7.61 s22.93 s
Typical response start0.53 s1.57 s
Typical output speed78.5 tok/s24.5 tok/s
Blended token price$0.3588 / 1M$0.3367 / 1M
Typical route uptime99.94%96.94%

Visual comparison

Price and performance charts

Alibaba Cloud Int.NextBit
500-token response by shared model

Estimated seconds using recent median response-start and output-speed data. Lower is better.

Alibaba Cloud Int. has the lower typical same-model response ratio across 4 measured models.

Blended token price by shared model

USD per 1 million tokens using a 1,000-input/500-output mix. Lower is better.

NextBit has the lower typical price ratio across 4 priced shared models.

Shared text models

4 exact models · newest first

ModelAlibaba Cloud Int.NextBit
DeepSeek V4 FlashWinner · Alibaba Cloud Int.

deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Alibaba Cloud Int.
Blended price
$0.1787 / 1M
500-token response
12.56 s
Response starts
1.69 s
Output speed
46.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.67%
Context
1M
Route
alibaba
NextBit
Blended price
$0.2367 / 1M
500-token response
32.88 s
Response starts
1.63 s
Output speed
16.0 tok/s
Route uptime
94.46%
Context
1M
Route
nextbit/fp8
Qwen3.5-35B-A3BWinner · Alibaba Cloud Int.

qwen/qwen3.5-35b-a3b

Alibaba Cloud Int.
Blended price
$0.5417 / 1M
500-token response
4.44 s
Response starts
0.65 s
Output speed
132.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.89%
Context
262.1K
Route
alibaba
NextBit
Blended price
$0.6867 / 1M
500-token response
18.04 s
Response starts
1.91 s
Output speed
31.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.41%
Context
262.1K
Route
nextbit/fp8
Qwen3 30B A3BWinner · Alibaba Cloud Int.

qwen/qwen3-30b-a3b

Alibaba Cloud Int.
Blended price
$0.26 / 1M
500-token response
5.12 s
Response starts
0.41 s
Output speed
106.0 tok/s
Route uptime
100.00%
Context
131.1K
Route
alibaba
NextBit
Blended price
$0.2767 / 1M
500-token response
27.82 s
Response starts
1.51 s
Output speed
19.0 tok/s
Route uptime
83.56%
Context
32.8K
Route
nextbit/fp8
Qwen3 14BWinner · NextBit

qwen/qwen3-14b

Alibaba Cloud Int.
Blended price
$0.455 / 1M
500-token response
10.09 s
Response starts
0.28 s
Output speed
51.0 tok/s
Route uptime
100.00%
Context
131.1K
Route
alibaba
NextBit
Blended price
$0.1467 / 1M
500-token response
17.70 s
Response starts
1.03 s
Output speed
30.0 tok/s
Route uptime
100.00%
Context
41K
Route
nextbit/int4

A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated . Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.

Alibaba Cloud Int. vs NextBit analysis

How Alibaba Cloud Int. and NextBit compare for AI inference

Alibaba Cloud Int. and NextBit share 4 indexed text models, including DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B, Qwen3 30B A3B, Qwen3 14B. Alibaba Cloud Int. has the stronger typical response-time result on the directly measured set.

Same-model speed evidence

4 shared models currently have complete response-start and output-speed measurements on both providers. The speed comparison uses per-model ratios before taking the median, so naturally faster model catalogs do not improve the result.

Token pricing on one workload

4 shared models have complete input and output prices on both providers. Prices use the same 1,000-input/500-output-token mix and are normalized to one million tokens for readability.

Catalog and deployment differences

Alibaba Cloud Int. has 48 indexed models and lists 2 published server regions; NextBit has 13 models and lists 1 region. Verify data residency, privacy terms, limits, and production latency directly before choosing.

Related same-model benchmarks

Compare with other providers

Explore qualified alternatives with the most shared measured models. Recommendations include comparisons for both Alibaba Cloud Int. and NextBit.

Alibaba Cloud Int. vs DeepInfra

17 shared model benchmarks

NextBit vs Mistral

3 shared model benchmarks

Alibaba Cloud Int. vs NovitaAI

16 shared model benchmarks

NextBit vs Parasail

3 shared model benchmarks

Alibaba Cloud Int. vs SiliconFlow

13 shared model benchmarks

NextBit vs Venice

3 shared model benchmarks