Anthropic
12 indexed models
- Headquarters
United States
- Server regions
- N/a
- Model types
- 12 text
Start typing to search.
Same-model provider benchmark
Compare Anthropic and Azure on 10 exact shared text models. ProviderBench keeps speed, price, and catalog coverage separate so naturally faster model catalogs cannot distort the result.
12 indexed models
50 indexed models
At a glance
There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.
| Metric | Anthropic | Azure |
|---|---|---|
| Typical 500-token response | 12.69 s | 17.24 s |
| Typical response start | 2.06 s | 3.70 s |
| Typical output speed | 47.0 tok/s | 35.0 tok/s |
| Blended token price | $12.6 / 1M | $12.6 / 1M |
| Typical route uptime | 99.93% | 99.49% |
Visual comparison
Estimated seconds using recent median response-start and output-speed data. Lower is better.
Anthropic has the lower typical same-model response ratio across 7 measured models.
USD per 1 million tokens using a 1,000-input/500-output mix. Lower is better.
Neither provider has a clear token-price advantage.
| Model | Anthropic | Azure |
|---|---|---|
Claude Sonnet 5Winner · Azure anthropic/claude-sonnet-5 | Anthropic
| Azure
|
anthropic/claude-fable-5 | Anthropic
| Azure
|
Claude Opus 4.8Winner · Anthropic anthropic/claude-opus-4.8 | Anthropic
| Azure
|
Claude Opus 4.7Winner · Anthropic anthropic/claude-opus-4.7 | Anthropic
| Azure
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6Winner · Azure anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6 | Anthropic
| Azure
|
Claude Opus 4.6Winner · Anthropic anthropic/claude-opus-4.6 | Anthropic
| Azure
|
anthropic/claude-opus-4.5 | Anthropic
| Azure
|
Claude Haiku 4.5Winner · Anthropic anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5 | Anthropic
| Azure
|
anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5 | Anthropic
| Azure
|
Claude Opus 4.1Winner · Anthropic anthropic/claude-opus-4.1 | Anthropic
| Azure
|
A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated . Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.
Anthropic vs Azure analysis
Anthropic and Azure share 10 indexed text models, including Claude Sonnet 5, Claude Fable 5, Claude Opus 4.8, Claude Opus 4.7, Claude Sonnet 4.6. Anthropic has the stronger typical response-time result on the directly measured set.
7 shared models currently have complete response-start and output-speed measurements on both providers. The speed comparison uses per-model ratios before taking the median, so naturally faster model catalogs do not improve the result.
10 shared models have complete input and output prices on both providers. Prices use the same 1,000-input/500-output-token mix and are normalized to one million tokens for readability.
Anthropic has 12 indexed models and lists no published server regions; Azure has 50 models and lists 2 regions. Verify data residency, privacy terms, limits, and production latency directly before choosing.
Related same-model benchmarks
Explore qualified alternatives with the most shared measured models. Recommendations include comparisons for both Anthropic and Azure.