Skip to content

Same-model provider benchmark

AtlasCloud vs Baidu Qianfan: LLM provider comparison

Compare AtlasCloud and Baidu Qianfan on 7 exact shared text models. ProviderBench keeps speed, price, and catalog coverage separate so naturally faster model catalogs cannot distort the result.

AtlasCloud

31 indexed models

Headquarters
United States
Server regions
N/a
Model types
26 text, 5 video

Baidu Qianfan

7 indexed models

Headquarters
China
Server regions
N/a
Model types
7 text

At a glance

Metric winners

There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.

Fastest on shared models

1.33× typical advantage

7 exact models with complete recent speed data

Lowest token cost

$1.0826 / 1M

7 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix

Most models available

31 models

Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities

Shared-model benchmark summary

MetricAtlasCloudBaidu Qianfan
Typical 500-token response16.69 s13.46 s
Typical response start2.10 s1.04 s
Typical output speed35.0 tok/s40.0 tok/s
Blended token price$1.529 / 1M$1.0826 / 1M
Typical route uptime98.60%99.35%

Visual comparison

Price and performance charts

AtlasCloudBaidu Qianfan
500-token response by shared model

Estimated seconds using recent median response-start and output-speed data. Lower is better.

Baidu Qianfan has the lower typical same-model response ratio across 7 measured models.

Blended token price by shared model

USD per 1 million tokens using a 1,000-input/500-output mix. Lower is better.

Baidu Qianfan has the lower typical price ratio across 7 priced shared models.

Shared text models

7 exact models · newest first

ModelAtlasCloudBaidu Qianfan
GLM 5.2Winner · Baidu Qianfan

z-ai/glm-5.2

AtlasCloud
Blended price
$2.16 / 1M
500-token response
15.37 s
Response starts
1.86 s
Output speed
37.0 tok/s
Route uptime
98.60%
Context
1M
Route
atlas-cloud/fp8
Baidu Qianfan
Blended price
$1.67 / 1M
500-token response
11.25 s
Response starts
1.05 s
Output speed
49.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.53%
Context
1M
Route
baidu/fp8
DeepSeek V4 ProWinner · Baidu Qianfan

deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro

AtlasCloud
Blended price
$2.2467 / 1M
500-token response
16.69 s
Response starts
2.40 s
Output speed
35.0 tok/s
Route uptime
93.58%
Context
1M
Route
atlas-cloud/fp4
Baidu Qianfan
Blended price
$0.9937 / 1M
500-token response
12.62 s
Response starts
1.26 s
Output speed
44.0 tok/s
Route uptime
98.14%
Context
1M
Route
baidu/fp8
DeepSeek V4 FlashWinner · Baidu Qianfan

deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

AtlasCloud
Blended price
$0.1867 / 1M
500-token response
11.42 s
Response starts
1.61 s
Output speed
51.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.60%
Context
1M
Route
atlas-cloud/fp4
Baidu Qianfan
Blended price
$0.1311 / 1M
500-token response
7.67 s
Response starts
0.72 s
Output speed
72.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.77%
Context
1M
Route
baidu/fp8
Kimi K2.6Winner · Baidu Qianfan

moonshotai/kimi-k2.6

AtlasCloud
Blended price
$1.9667 / 1M
500-token response
23.39 s
Response starts
4.16 s
Output speed
26.0 tok/s
Route uptime
96.35%
Context
262.1K
Route
atlas-cloud/int4
Baidu Qianfan
Blended price
$1.596 / 1M
500-token response
14.79 s
Response starts
0.90 s
Output speed
36.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.34%
Context
262.1K
Route
baidu/fp4
GLM 5.1Winner · Baidu Qianfan

z-ai/glm-5.1

AtlasCloud
Blended price
$2.16 / 1M
500-token response
22.49 s
Response starts
3.26 s
Output speed
26.0 tok/s
Route uptime
85.25%
Context
202.8K
Route
atlas-cloud/fp8
Baidu Qianfan
Blended price
$1.68 / 1M
500-token response
16.87 s
Response starts
1.24 s
Output speed
32.0 tok/s
Route uptime
79.26%
Context
202.8K
Route
baidu/fp8
GLM 5Winner · Baidu Qianfan

z-ai/glm-5

AtlasCloud
Blended price
$1.6833 / 1M
500-token response
15.44 s
Response starts
2.10 s
Output speed
37.5 tok/s
Route uptime
99.79%
Context
202.8K
Route
atlas-cloud/fp8
Baidu Qianfan
Blended price
$1.2133 / 1M
500-token response
13.46 s
Response starts
0.96 s
Output speed
40.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.35%
Context
202.8K
Route
baidu/fp8
DeepSeek V3.2Winner · AtlasCloud

deepseek/deepseek-v3.2

AtlasCloud
Blended price
$0.3 / 1M
500-token response
23.21 s
Response starts
1.47 s
Output speed
23.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.94%
Context
163.8K
Route
atlas-cloud/fp8
Baidu Qianfan
Blended price
$0.294 / 1M
500-token response
27.36 s
Response starts
1.04 s
Output speed
19.0 tok/s
Route uptime
100.00%
Context
131.1K
Route
baidu/fp8

A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated . Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.

AtlasCloud vs Baidu Qianfan analysis

How AtlasCloud and Baidu Qianfan compare for AI inference

AtlasCloud and Baidu Qianfan share 7 indexed text models, including GLM 5.2, DeepSeek V4 Pro, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Kimi K2.6, GLM 5.1. Baidu Qianfan has the stronger typical response-time result on the directly measured set.

Same-model speed evidence

7 shared models currently have complete response-start and output-speed measurements on both providers. The speed comparison uses per-model ratios before taking the median, so naturally faster model catalogs do not improve the result.

Token pricing on one workload

7 shared models have complete input and output prices on both providers. Prices use the same 1,000-input/500-output-token mix and are normalized to one million tokens for readability.

Catalog and deployment differences

AtlasCloud has 31 indexed models and lists no published server regions; Baidu Qianfan has 7 models and lists no regions. Verify data residency, privacy terms, limits, and production latency directly before choosing.