Skip to content
ProviderBench home

Same-model provider benchmark

AtlasCloud vs Google Vertex: LLM provider comparison

Compare AtlasCloud and Google Vertex on 4 exact shared text models. ProviderBench keeps speed, price, and catalog coverage separate so naturally faster model catalogs cannot distort the result.

AtlasCloud

31 indexed models

Headquarters
United States
Server regions
N/a
Model types
26 text, 5 video

Google Vertex

49 indexed models

Headquarters
United States
Server regions
europe-west1 · Belgiumeurope-west4 · NetherlandsGlobalus-central1 · United Statesus-east5 · United Statesus-south1 · United Statesus-west2 · United States
Model types
36 text, 6 image, 3 video, 2 embeddings, 1 speech, 1 transcription

At a glance

Metric winners

There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.

Fastest on shared models

Google Vertex

2.33× typical advantage

3 exact models with complete recent speed data

Lowest token cost

AtlasCloud

$0.5517 / 1M

4 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix

Most models available

Google Vertex

49 models

Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities

Shared-model benchmark summary

MetricAtlasCloudGoogle Vertex
Typical 500-token response17.42 s6.51 s
Typical response start1.29 s0.63 s
Typical output speed31.0 tok/s94.0 tok/s
Blended token price$0.5517 / 1M$0.8683 / 1M
Typical route uptime97.02%99.96%

Visual comparison

Price and performance charts

AtlasCloudGoogle Vertex
500-token response by shared model

Estimated seconds using recent median response-start and output-speed data. Lower is better.

Google Vertex has the lower typical same-model response ratio across 3 measured models.

Blended token price by shared model

USD per 1 million tokens using a 1,000-input/500-output mix. Lower is better.

AtlasCloud has the lower typical price ratio across 4 priced shared models.

Shared text models

4 exact models · newest first

ModelAtlasCloudGoogle Vertex
GLM 4.7Winner · Google Vertex

z-ai/glm-4.7

AtlasCloud
Blended price
$0.9633 / 1M
500-token response
19.68 s
Response starts
1.82 s
Output speed
28.0 tok/s
Route uptime
92.66%
Context
202.8K
Route
atlas-cloud/fp8
Google Vertex
Blended price
$1.1333 / 1M
500-token response
4.55 s
Response starts
0.45 s
Output speed
122.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.97%
Context
200K
Route
google-vertex
DeepSeek V3.2

deepseek/deepseek-v3.2

AtlasCloud
Blended price
$0.3 / 1M
500-token response
23.21 s
Response starts
1.47 s
Output speed
23.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.94%
Context
163.8K
Route
atlas-cloud/fp8
Google Vertex
Blended price
$0.9333 / 1M
500-token response
N/a
Response starts
N/a
Output speed
N/a
Route uptime
N/a
Context
163.8K
Route
google-vertex
DeepSeek V3.1Winner · Google Vertex

deepseek/deepseek-chat-v3.1

AtlasCloud
Blended price
$0.5167 / 1M
500-token response
15.15 s
Response starts
1.26 s
Output speed
36.0 tok/s
Route uptime
97.02%
Context
131.1K
Route
atlas-cloud/fp8
Google Vertex
Blended price
$0.9667 / 1M
500-token response
6.51 s
Response starts
1.19 s
Output speed
94.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.89%
Context
163.8K
Route
google-vertex/us-west2
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Winner · AtlasCloud

qwen/qwen3-235b-a22b-2507

AtlasCloud
Blended price
$0.4267 / 1M
500-token response
17.42 s
Response starts
1.29 s
Output speed
31.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.97%
Context
131.1K
Route
atlas-cloud/fp8
Google Vertex
Blended price
$0.44 / 1M
500-token response
26.28 s
Response starts
0.63 s
Output speed
19.5 tok/s
Route uptime
99.96%
Context
262.1K
Route
google-vertex/us-south1

A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated . Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.

AtlasCloud vs Google Vertex analysis

How AtlasCloud and Google Vertex compare for AI inference

AtlasCloud and Google Vertex share 4 indexed text models, including GLM 4.7, DeepSeek V3.2, DeepSeek V3.1, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507. Google Vertex has the stronger typical response-time result on the directly measured set.

Same-model speed evidence

3 shared models currently have complete response-start and output-speed measurements on both providers. The speed comparison uses per-model ratios before taking the median, so naturally faster model catalogs do not improve the result.

Token pricing on one workload

4 shared models have complete input and output prices on both providers. Prices use the same 1,000-input/500-output-token mix and are normalized to one million tokens for readability.

Catalog and deployment differences

AtlasCloud has 31 indexed models and lists no published server regions; Google Vertex has 49 models and lists 7 regions. Verify data residency, privacy terms, limits, and production latency directly before choosing.

Related same-model benchmarks

Compare with other providers

Explore qualified alternatives with the most shared measured models. Recommendations include comparisons for both AtlasCloud and Google Vertex.

AtlasCloud vs DeepInfra

22 shared model benchmarks

Google Vertex vs NovitaAI

12 shared model benchmarks

AtlasCloud vs SiliconFlow

17 shared model benchmarks

Google Vertex vs Amazon Bedrock

12 shared model benchmarks

AtlasCloud vs Venice

16 shared model benchmarks

Google Vertex vs Anthropic

10 shared model benchmarks