Skip to content

Same-model provider benchmark

DigitalOcean vs Venice: LLM provider comparison

Compare DigitalOcean and Venice on 11 exact shared text models. ProviderBench keeps speed, price, and catalog coverage separate so naturally faster model catalogs cannot distort the result.

DigitalOcean

16 indexed models

Headquarters
N/a
Server regions
N/a
Model types
16 text

Venice

29 indexed models

Headquarters
United States
Server regions
United States
Model types
29 text

At a glance

Metric winners

There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.

Fastest on shared models

1.99× typical advantage

11 exact models with complete recent speed data

Lowest token cost

$1.1343 / 1M

11 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix

Most models available

29 models

Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities

Shared-model benchmark summary

MetricDigitalOceanVenice
Typical 500-token response33.90 s14.33 s
Typical response start1.13 s1.43 s
Typical output speed15.0 tok/s40.0 tok/s
Blended token price$1.1343 / 1M$1.4025 / 1M
Typical route uptime98.78%99.22%

Visual comparison

Price and performance charts

DigitalOceanVenice
500-token response by shared model

Estimated seconds using recent median response-start and output-speed data. Lower is better.

Venice has the lower typical same-model response ratio across 11 measured models.

Blended token price by shared model

USD per 1 million tokens using a 1,000-input/500-output mix. Lower is better.

DigitalOcean has the lower typical price ratio across 11 priced shared models.

Shared text models

11 exact models · newest first

ModelDigitalOceanVenice
GLM 5.2Winner · DigitalOcean

z-ai/glm-5.2

DigitalOcean
Blended price
$2.1667 / 1M
500-token response
12.22 s
Response starts
1.11 s
Output speed
45.0 tok/s
Route uptime
98.78%
Context
262.1K
Route
digitalocean
Venice
Blended price
$2.4 / 1M
500-token response
14.33 s
Response starts
1.17 s
Output speed
38.0 tok/s
Route uptime
94.48%
Context
1M
Route
venice/fp8
DeepSeek V4 ProWinner · Venice

deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro

DigitalOcean
Blended price
$1.856 / 1M
500-token response
33.90 s
Response starts
0.57 s
Output speed
15.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.92%
Context
262.1K
Route
digitalocean
Venice
Blended price
$2.2003 / 1M
500-token response
28.55 s
Response starts
2.23 s
Output speed
19.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.91%
Context
1M
Route
venice
DeepSeek V4 FlashWinner · Venice

deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

DigitalOcean
Blended price
$0.1493 / 1M
500-token response
39.59 s
Response starts
1.13 s
Output speed
13.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.79%
Context
262.1K
Route
digitalocean
Venice
Blended price
$0.1837 / 1M
500-token response
14.58 s
Response starts
2.08 s
Output speed
40.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.58%
Context
1M
Route
venice
MiMo-V2.5Winner · Venice

xiaomi/mimo-v2.5

DigitalOcean
Blended price
$0.1633 / 1M
500-token response
32.65 s
Response starts
1.40 s
Output speed
16.0 tok/s
Route uptime
97.47%
Context
262.1K
Route
digitalocean
Venice
Blended price
$0.1867 / 1M
500-token response
10.97 s
Response starts
1.17 s
Output speed
51.0 tok/s
Route uptime
91.56%
Context
1M
Route
venice/fp8
Kimi K2.6Winner · Venice

moonshotai/kimi-k2.6

DigitalOcean
Blended price
$1.5733 / 1M
500-token response
13.08 s
Response starts
0.89 s
Output speed
41.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.04%
Context
262.1K
Route
digitalocean
Venice
Blended price
$1.6667 / 1M
500-token response
12.06 s
Response starts
1.43 s
Output speed
47.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.22%
Context
256K
Route
venice/int4
GLM 5.1Winner · Venice

z-ai/glm-5.1

DigitalOcean
Blended price
$2.0833 / 1M
500-token response
29.06 s
Response starts
1.28 s
Output speed
18.0 tok/s
Route uptime
57.53%
Context
163.8K
Route
digitalocean
Venice
Blended price
$2.64 / 1M
500-token response
14.61 s
Response starts
1.46 s
Output speed
38.0 tok/s
Route uptime
88.98%
Context
200K
Route
venice/fp8
Qwen3.5 397B A17BWinner · Venice

qwen/qwen3.5-397b-a17b

DigitalOcean
Blended price
$1.0733 / 1M
500-token response
60.33 s
Response starts
4.77 s
Output speed
9.0 tok/s
Route uptime
81.67%
Context
131.1K
Route
digitalocean
Venice
Blended price
$2 / 1M
500-token response
10.11 s
Response starts
1.49 s
Output speed
58.0 tok/s
Route uptime
N/a
Context
128K
Route
venice
MiniMax M2.5Winner · DigitalOcean

minimax/minimax-m2.5

DigitalOcean
Blended price
$0.45 / 1M
500-token response
8.35 s
Response starts
0.78 s
Output speed
66.0 tok/s
Route uptime
100.00%
Context
65.5K
Route
digitalocean
Venice
Blended price
$0.4967 / 1M
500-token response
9.78 s
Response starts
1.16 s
Output speed
58.0 tok/s
Route uptime
N/a
Context
198K
Route
venice
GLM 5Winner · Venice

z-ai/glm-5

DigitalOcean
Blended price
$1.3 / 1M
500-token response
63.85 s
Response starts
1.35 s
Output speed
8.0 tok/s
Route uptime
95.70%
Context
64K
Route
digitalocean
Venice
Blended price
$1.7333 / 1M
500-token response
20.55 s
Response starts
1.32 s
Output speed
26.0 tok/s
Route uptime
N/a
Context
198K
Route
venice/fp8
Kimi K2.5Winner · Venice

moonshotai/kimi-k2.5

DigitalOcean
Blended price
$0.925 / 1M
500-token response
34.35 s
Response starts
1.01 s
Output speed
15.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.45%
Context
262.1K
Route
digitalocean
Venice
Blended price
$1.54 / 1M
500-token response
5.81 s
Response starts
1.45 s
Output speed
114.5 tok/s
Route uptime
N/a
Context
256K
Route
venice
DeepSeek V3.2Winner · Venice

deepseek/deepseek-v3.2

DigitalOcean
Blended price
$0.7367 / 1M
500-token response
57.26 s
Response starts
1.71 s
Output speed
9.0 tok/s
Route uptime
96.84%
Context
163.8K
Route
digitalocean
Venice
Blended price
$0.38 / 1M
500-token response
84.24 s
Response starts
0.90 s
Output speed
6.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.40%
Context
160K
Route
venice

A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated . Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.

DigitalOcean vs Venice analysis

How DigitalOcean and Venice compare for AI inference

DigitalOcean and Venice share 11 indexed text models, including GLM 5.2, DeepSeek V4 Pro, DeepSeek V4 Flash, MiMo-V2.5, Kimi K2.6. Venice has the stronger typical response-time result on the directly measured set.

Same-model speed evidence

11 shared models currently have complete response-start and output-speed measurements on both providers. The speed comparison uses per-model ratios before taking the median, so naturally faster model catalogs do not improve the result.

Token pricing on one workload

11 shared models have complete input and output prices on both providers. Prices use the same 1,000-input/500-output-token mix and are normalized to one million tokens for readability.

Catalog and deployment differences

DigitalOcean has 16 indexed models and lists no published server regions; Venice has 29 models and lists 1 region. Verify data residency, privacy terms, limits, and production latency directly before choosing.