Skip to content

Same-model provider benchmark

Friendli vs NovitaAI: LLM provider comparison

Compare Friendli and NovitaAI on 5 exact shared text models. ProviderBench keeps speed, price, and catalog coverage separate so naturally faster model catalogs cannot distort the result.

Friendli

5 indexed models

Headquarters
United States
Server regions
N/a
Model types
5 text

NovitaAI

66 indexed models

Headquarters
United States
Server regions
N/a
Model types
66 text

At a glance

Metric winners

There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.

Fastest on shared models

4.18× typical advantage

5 exact models with complete recent speed data

Lowest token cost

$1.0413 / 1M

5 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix

Most models available

66 models

Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities

Shared-model benchmark summary

MetricFriendliNovitaAI
Typical 500-token response5.41 s23.05 s
Typical response start0.57 s1.25 s
Typical output speed112.0 tok/s25.0 tok/s
Blended token price$1.3267 / 1M$1.0413 / 1M
Typical route uptime99.08%99.64%

Visual comparison

Price and performance charts

FriendliNovitaAI
500-token response by shared model

Estimated seconds using recent median response-start and output-speed data. Lower is better.

Friendli has the lower typical same-model response ratio across 5 measured models.

Blended token price by shared model

USD per 1 million tokens using a 1,000-input/500-output mix. Lower is better.

NovitaAI has the lower typical price ratio across 5 priced shared models.

Shared text models

5 exact models · newest first

ModelFriendliNovitaAI
GLM 5.2Winner · Friendli

z-ai/glm-5.2

Friendli
Blended price
$2.4 / 1M
500-token response
4.64 s
Response starts
0.57 s
Output speed
123.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.88%
Context
1M
Route
friendli
NovitaAI
Blended price
$1.6536 / 1M
500-token response
23.05 s
Response starts
3.05 s
Output speed
25.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.45%
Context
1M
Route
novita/fp8
GLM 5.1Winner · Friendli

z-ai/glm-5.1

Friendli
Blended price
$2.4 / 1M
500-token response
5.41 s
Response starts
0.95 s
Output speed
112.0 tok/s
Route uptime
97.46%
Context
202.8K
Route
friendli
NovitaAI
Blended price
$2.3867 / 1M
500-token response
22.62 s
Response starts
2.62 s
Output speed
25.0 tok/s
Route uptime
67.25%
Context
204.8K
Route
novita/fp8
MiniMax M2.5Winner · Friendli

minimax/minimax-m2.5

Friendli
Blended price
$0.6 / 1M
500-token response
4.57 s
Response starts
0.57 s
Output speed
125.0 tok/s
Route uptime
N/a
Context
196.6K
Route
friendli
NovitaAI
Blended price
$0.6 / 1M
500-token response
56.73 s
Response starts
1.17 s
Output speed
9.0 tok/s
Route uptime
N/a
Context
204.8K
Route
novita/fp8
DeepSeek V3.2Winner · NovitaAI

deepseek/deepseek-v3.2

Friendli
Blended price
$0.8333 / 1M
500-token response
16.17 s
Response starts
1.02 s
Output speed
33.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.39%
Context
163.8K
Route
friendli
NovitaAI
Blended price
$0.3127 / 1M
500-token response
23.97 s
Response starts
1.25 s
Output speed
22.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.97%
Context
163.8K
Route
novita/fp8

qwen/qwen3-235b-a22b-2507

Friendli
Blended price
$0.4 / 1M
500-token response
17.66 s
Response starts
0.42 s
Output speed
29.0 tok/s
Route uptime
98.77%
Context
262.1K
Route
friendli
NovitaAI
Blended price
$0.2533 / 1M
500-token response
19.95 s
Response starts
0.72 s
Output speed
26.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.83%
Context
131.1K
Route
novita/fp8

A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated . Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.

Friendli vs NovitaAI analysis

How Friendli and NovitaAI compare for AI inference

Friendli and NovitaAI share 5 indexed text models, including GLM 5.2, GLM 5.1, MiniMax M2.5, DeepSeek V3.2, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507. Friendli has the stronger typical response-time result on the directly measured set.

Same-model speed evidence

5 shared models currently have complete response-start and output-speed measurements on both providers. The speed comparison uses per-model ratios before taking the median, so naturally faster model catalogs do not improve the result.

Token pricing on one workload

5 shared models have complete input and output prices on both providers. Prices use the same 1,000-input/500-output-token mix and are normalized to one million tokens for readability.

Catalog and deployment differences

Friendli has 5 indexed models and lists no published server regions; NovitaAI has 66 models and lists no regions. Verify data residency, privacy terms, limits, and production latency directly before choosing.