Skip to content

Same-model provider benchmark

Groq vs NovitaAI: LLM provider comparison

Compare Groq and NovitaAI on 7 exact shared text models. ProviderBench keeps speed, price, and catalog coverage separate so naturally faster model catalogs cannot distort the result.

Groq

11 indexed models

Headquarters
United States
Server regions
N/a
Model types
9 text, 2 transcription

NovitaAI

66 indexed models

Headquarters
United States
Server regions
N/a
Model types
66 text

At a glance

Metric winners

There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.

Fastest on shared models

4.74× typical advantage

7 exact models with complete recent speed data

Lowest token cost

$0.3624 / 1M

7 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix

Most models available

66 models

Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities

Shared-model benchmark summary

MetricGroqNovitaAI
Typical 500-token response3.26 s14.46 s
Typical response start0.29 s0.71 s
Typical output speed168.0 tok/s39.0 tok/s
Blended token price$0.5743 / 1M$0.3624 / 1M
Typical route uptime99.94%99.29%

Visual comparison

Price and performance charts

GroqNovitaAI
500-token response by shared model

Estimated seconds using recent median response-start and output-speed data. Lower is better.

Groq has the lower typical same-model response ratio across 7 measured models.

Blended token price by shared model

USD per 1 million tokens using a 1,000-input/500-output mix. Lower is better.

NovitaAI has the lower typical price ratio across 7 priced shared models.

Shared text models

7 exact models · newest first

ModelGroqNovitaAI
MiniMax M2.7Winner · Groq

minimax/minimax-m2.7

Groq
Blended price
$1 / 1M
500-token response
3.11 s
Response starts
0.70 s
Output speed
208.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.63%
Context
196.6K
Route
groq
NovitaAI
Blended price
$0.54 / 1M
500-token response
14.46 s
Response starts
1.64 s
Output speed
39.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.29%
Context
204.8K
Route
novita/fp8
Kimi K2 0905Winner · Groq

moonshotai/kimi-k2-0905

Groq
Blended price
$1.6667 / 1M
500-token response
7.70 s
Response starts
0.40 s
Output speed
68.5 tok/s
Route uptime
99.95%
Context
262.1K
Route
groq
NovitaAI
Blended price
$1.2333 / 1M
500-token response
51.58 s
Response starts
1.58 s
Output speed
10.0 tok/s
Route uptime
97.20%
Context
262.1K
Route
novita/fp8
gpt-oss-120bWinner · Groq

openai/gpt-oss-120b

Groq
Blended price
$0.3 / 1M
500-token response
1.48 s
Response starts
0.20 s
Output speed
391.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.99%
Context
131.1K
Route
groq
NovitaAI
Blended price
$0.1167 / 1M
500-token response
9.33 s
Response starts
0.71 s
Output speed
58.0 tok/s
Route uptime
98.36%
Context
131.1K
Route
novita/fp4
gpt-oss-20bWinner · NovitaAI

openai/gpt-oss-20b

Groq
Blended price
$0.15 / 1M
500-token response
2.51 s
Response starts
0.41 s
Output speed
238.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.94%
Context
131.1K
Route
groq
NovitaAI
Blended price
$0.0767 / 1M
500-token response
4.79 s
Response starts
0.37 s
Output speed
113.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.98%
Context
131.1K
Route
novita/fp4
Llama 4 ScoutWinner · Groq

meta-llama/llama-4-scout

Groq
Blended price
$0.1867 / 1M
500-token response
10.61 s
Response starts
0.20 s
Output speed
48.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.88%
Context
131.1K
Route
groq
NovitaAI
Blended price
$0.3167 / 1M
500-token response
71.90 s
Response starts
0.47 s
Output speed
7.0 tok/s
Route uptime
100.00%
Context
131.1K
Route
novita/bf16

meta-llama/llama-3.3-70b-instruct

Groq
Blended price
$0.6567 / 1M
500-token response
3.26 s
Response starts
0.29 s
Output speed
168.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.51%
Context
131.1K
Route
groq
NovitaAI
Blended price
$0.2233 / 1M
500-token response
15.48 s
Response starts
0.78 s
Output speed
34.0 tok/s
Route uptime
90.47%
Context
6K
Route
novita/bf16
Llama 3.1 8B InstructWinner · NovitaAI

meta-llama/llama-3.1-8b-instruct

Groq
Blended price
$0.06 / 1M
500-token response
4.62 s
Response starts
0.24 s
Output speed
114.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.99%
Context
131.1K
Route
groq
NovitaAI
Blended price
$0.03 / 1M
500-token response
7.93 s
Response starts
0.47 s
Output speed
67.0 tok/s
Route uptime
100.00%
Context
16.4K
Route
novita/fp8

A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated . Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.

Groq vs NovitaAI analysis

How Groq and NovitaAI compare for AI inference

Groq and NovitaAI share 7 indexed text models, including MiniMax M2.7, Kimi K2 0905, gpt-oss-120b, gpt-oss-20b, Llama 4 Scout. Groq has the stronger typical response-time result on the directly measured set.

Same-model speed evidence

7 shared models currently have complete response-start and output-speed measurements on both providers. The speed comparison uses per-model ratios before taking the median, so naturally faster model catalogs do not improve the result.

Token pricing on one workload

7 shared models have complete input and output prices on both providers. Prices use the same 1,000-input/500-output-token mix and are normalized to one million tokens for readability.

Catalog and deployment differences

Groq has 11 indexed models and lists no published server regions; NovitaAI has 66 models and lists no regions. Verify data residency, privacy terms, limits, and production latency directly before choosing.