Skip to content

Same-model provider benchmark

Groq vs Parasail: LLM provider comparison

Compare Groq and Parasail on 3 exact shared text models. ProviderBench keeps speed, price, and catalog coverage separate so naturally faster model catalogs cannot distort the result.

Groq

11 indexed models

Headquarters
United States
Server regions
N/a
Model types
9 text, 2 transcription

Parasail

35 indexed models

Headquarters
United States
Server regions
N/a
Model types
34 text, 1 embeddings

At a glance

Metric winners

There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.

Fastest on shared models

3.40× typical advantage

3 exact models with complete recent speed data

Lowest token cost

$0.2411 / 1M

3 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix

Most models available

35 models

Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities

Shared-model benchmark summary

MetricGroqParasail
Typical 500-token response2.51 s9.13 s
Typical response start0.29 s0.51 s
Typical output speed238.0 tok/s58.0 tok/s
Blended token price$0.3689 / 1M$0.2411 / 1M
Typical route uptime99.94%98.25%

Visual comparison

Price and performance charts

GroqParasail
500-token response by shared model

Estimated seconds using recent median response-start and output-speed data. Lower is better.

Groq has the lower typical same-model response ratio across 3 measured models.

Blended token price by shared model

USD per 1 million tokens using a 1,000-input/500-output mix. Lower is better.

Parasail has the lower typical price ratio across 3 priced shared models.

Shared text models

3 exact models · newest first

ModelGroqParasail
gpt-oss-120bWinner · Groq

openai/gpt-oss-120b

Groq
Blended price
$0.3 / 1M
500-token response
1.48 s
Response starts
0.20 s
Output speed
391.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.99%
Context
131.1K
Route
groq
Parasail
Blended price
$0.3167 / 1M
500-token response
9.13 s
Response starts
0.51 s
Output speed
58.0 tok/s
Route uptime
92.57%
Context
131.1K
Route
parasail/fp4
gpt-oss-20bWinner · Groq

openai/gpt-oss-20b

Groq
Blended price
$0.15 / 1M
500-token response
2.51 s
Response starts
0.41 s
Output speed
238.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.94%
Context
131.1K
Route
groq
Parasail
Blended price
$0.0933 / 1M
500-token response
8.09 s
Response starts
0.52 s
Output speed
66.0 tok/s
Route uptime
98.25%
Context
131.1K
Route
parasail/fp4

meta-llama/llama-3.3-70b-instruct

Groq
Blended price
$0.6567 / 1M
500-token response
3.26 s
Response starts
0.29 s
Output speed
168.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.51%
Context
131.1K
Route
groq
Parasail
Blended price
$0.3133 / 1M
500-token response
11.10 s
Response starts
0.46 s
Output speed
47.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.56%
Context
131.1K
Route
parasail/fp8

A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated . Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.

Groq vs Parasail analysis

How Groq and Parasail compare for AI inference

Groq and Parasail share 3 indexed text models, including gpt-oss-120b, gpt-oss-20b, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct. Groq has the stronger typical response-time result on the directly measured set.

Same-model speed evidence

3 shared models currently have complete response-start and output-speed measurements on both providers. The speed comparison uses per-model ratios before taking the median, so naturally faster model catalogs do not improve the result.

Token pricing on one workload

3 shared models have complete input and output prices on both providers. Prices use the same 1,000-input/500-output-token mix and are normalized to one million tokens for readability.

Catalog and deployment differences

Groq has 11 indexed models and lists no published server regions; Parasail has 35 models and lists no regions. Verify data residency, privacy terms, limits, and production latency directly before choosing.