Skip to content
ProviderBench home

Same-model provider benchmark

ModelRun vs NovitaAI: LLM provider comparison

Compare ModelRun and NovitaAI on 4 exact shared text models. ProviderBench keeps speed, price, and catalog coverage separate so naturally faster model catalogs cannot distort the result.

ModelRun

4 indexed models

Headquarters
United States
Server regions
United States
Model types
4 text

NovitaAI

66 indexed models

Headquarters
United States
Server regions
N/a
Model types
66 text

At a glance

Metric winners

There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.

Fastest on shared models

ModelRun

2.25× typical advantage

4 exact models with complete recent speed data

Lowest token cost

ModelRun

$1.1617 / 1M

4 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix

Most models available

NovitaAI

66 models

Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities

Shared-model benchmark summary

MetricModelRunNovitaAI
Typical 500-token response10.42 s25.60 s
Typical response start0.70 s2.97 s
Typical output speed62.0 tok/s24.0 tok/s
Blended token price$1.1617 / 1M$1.2778 / 1M
Typical route uptime98.72%99.23%

Visual comparison

Price and performance charts

ModelRunNovitaAI
500-token response by shared model

Estimated seconds using recent median response-start and output-speed data. Lower is better.

ModelRun has the lower typical same-model response ratio across 4 measured models.

Blended token price by shared model

USD per 1 million tokens using a 1,000-input/500-output mix. Lower is better.

ModelRun has the lower typical price ratio across 4 priced shared models.

Shared text models

4 exact models · newest first

ModelModelRunNovitaAI
Kimi K2.7 CodeWinner · ModelRun

moonshotai/kimi-k2.7-code

ModelRun
Blended price
$1.8167 / 1M
500-token response
3.35 s
Response starts
0.46 s
Output speed
173.0 tok/s
Route uptime
98.81%
Context
262.1K
Route
modelrun/fp4
NovitaAI
Blended price
$1.888 / 1M
500-token response
29.25 s
Response starts
2.94 s
Output speed
19.0 tok/s
Route uptime
100.00%
Context
262.1K
Route
novita/int4
Kimi K2.6Winner · ModelRun

moonshotai/kimi-k2.6

ModelRun
Blended price
$1.6 / 1M
500-token response
13.99 s
Response starts
1.49 s
Output speed
40.0 tok/s
Route uptime
98.64%
Context
262.1K
Route
modelrun/fp4
NovitaAI
Blended price
$1.6667 / 1M
500-token response
20.24 s
Response starts
3.00 s
Output speed
29.0 tok/s
Route uptime
98.89%
Context
262.1K
Route
novita
Gemma 4 31BWinner · ModelRun

google/gemma-4-31b-it

ModelRun
Blended price
$0.33 / 1M
500-token response
6.85 s
Response starts
0.90 s
Output speed
84.0 tok/s
Route uptime
97.84%
Context
262.1K
Route
modelrun/fp4
NovitaAI
Blended price
$0.2267 / 1M
500-token response
34.37 s
Response starts
1.04 s
Output speed
15.0 tok/s
Route uptime
98.00%
Context
262.1K
Route
novita/bf16
Kimi K2.5Winner · ModelRun

moonshotai/kimi-k2.5

ModelRun
Blended price
$0.9 / 1M
500-token response
16.12 s
Response starts
0.50 s
Output speed
32.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.76%
Context
262.1K
Route
modelrun/fp4
NovitaAI
Blended price
$1.33 / 1M
500-token response
21.94 s
Response starts
4.70 s
Output speed
29.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.56%
Context
262.1K
Route
novita

A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated . Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.

ModelRun vs NovitaAI analysis

How ModelRun and NovitaAI compare for AI inference

ModelRun and NovitaAI share 4 indexed text models, including Kimi K2.7 Code, Kimi K2.6, Gemma 4 31B, Kimi K2.5. ModelRun has the stronger typical response-time result on the directly measured set.

Same-model speed evidence

4 shared models currently have complete response-start and output-speed measurements on both providers. The speed comparison uses per-model ratios before taking the median, so naturally faster model catalogs do not improve the result.

Token pricing on one workload

4 shared models have complete input and output prices on both providers. Prices use the same 1,000-input/500-output-token mix and are normalized to one million tokens for readability.

Catalog and deployment differences

ModelRun has 4 indexed models and lists 1 published server region; NovitaAI has 66 models and lists no regions. Verify data residency, privacy terms, limits, and production latency directly before choosing.

Related same-model benchmarks

Compare with other providers

Explore qualified alternatives with the most shared measured models. Recommendations include comparisons for both ModelRun and NovitaAI.

ModelRun vs DeepInfra

4 shared model benchmarks

NovitaAI vs SiliconFlow

24 shared model benchmarks

ModelRun vs Venice

4 shared model benchmarks

NovitaAI vs AtlasCloud

22 shared model benchmarks

ModelRun vs Chutes

3 shared model benchmarks

NovitaAI vs Parasail

22 shared model benchmarks