NovitaAI
66 indexed models
- Headquarters
United States
- Server regions
- N/a
- Model types
- 66 text
Start typing to search.
Same-model provider benchmark
Compare NovitaAI and Together on 10 exact shared text models. ProviderBench keeps speed, price, and catalog coverage separate so naturally faster model catalogs cannot distort the result.
66 indexed models
19 indexed models
At a glance
There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.
| Metric | NovitaAI | Together |
|---|---|---|
| Typical 500-token response | 16.47 s | 7.90 s |
| Typical response start | 1.73 s | 0.55 s |
| Typical output speed | 35.0 tok/s | 70.0 tok/s |
| Blended token price | $0.8549 / 1M | $1.21 / 1M |
| Typical route uptime | 98.89% | 97.87% |
Visual comparison
Estimated seconds using recent median response-start and output-speed data. Lower is better.
Together has the lower typical same-model response ratio across 10 measured models.
USD per 1 million tokens using a 1,000-input/500-output mix. Lower is better.
NovitaAI has the lower typical price ratio across 10 priced shared models.
| Model | NovitaAI | Together |
|---|---|---|
GLM 5.2Winner · Together z-ai/glm-5.2 | NovitaAI
| Together
|
Kimi K2.7 CodeWinner · Together moonshotai/kimi-k2.7-code | NovitaAI
| Together
|
MiniMax M3Winner · Together minimax/minimax-m3 | NovitaAI
| Together
|
DeepSeek V4 ProWinner · NovitaAI deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro | NovitaAI
| Together
|
Kimi K2.6Winner · Together moonshotai/kimi-k2.6 | NovitaAI
| Together
|
Gemma 4 31BWinner · NovitaAI google/gemma-4-31b-it | NovitaAI
| Together
|
MiniMax M2.7Winner · Together minimax/minimax-m2.7 | NovitaAI
| Together
|
gpt-oss-120bWinner · NovitaAI openai/gpt-oss-120b | NovitaAI
| Together
|
gpt-oss-20bWinner · Together openai/gpt-oss-20b | NovitaAI
| Together
|
Llama 3.3 70B InstructWinner · NovitaAI meta-llama/llama-3.3-70b-instruct | NovitaAI
| Together
|
A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated . Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.
NovitaAI vs Together analysis
NovitaAI and Together share 10 indexed text models, including GLM 5.2, Kimi K2.7 Code, MiniMax M3, DeepSeek V4 Pro, Kimi K2.6. Together has the stronger typical response-time result on the directly measured set.
10 shared models currently have complete response-start and output-speed measurements on both providers. The speed comparison uses per-model ratios before taking the median, so naturally faster model catalogs do not improve the result.
10 shared models have complete input and output prices on both providers. Prices use the same 1,000-input/500-output-token mix and are normalized to one million tokens for readability.
NovitaAI has 66 indexed models and lists no published server regions; Together has 19 models and lists no regions. Verify data residency, privacy terms, limits, and production latency directly before choosing.
Related same-model benchmarks
Explore qualified alternatives with the most shared measured models. Recommendations include comparisons for both NovitaAI and Together.