Skip to content

Same-model provider benchmark

Parasail vs Phala: LLM provider comparison

Compare Parasail and Phala on 10 exact shared text models. ProviderBench keeps speed, price, and catalog coverage separate so naturally faster model catalogs cannot distort the result.

Parasail

35 indexed models

Headquarters
United States
Server regions
N/a
Model types
34 text, 1 embeddings

Phala

18 indexed models

Headquarters
United States
Server regions
N/a
Model types
18 text

At a glance

Metric winners

There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.

Fastest on shared models

1.93× typical advantage

10 exact models with complete recent speed data

Lowest token cost

$1.118 / 1M

10 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix

Most models available

35 models

Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities

Shared-model benchmark summary

MetricParasailPhala
Typical 500-token response9.11 s25.40 s
Typical response start0.72 s2.47 s
Typical output speed59.0 tok/s28.5 tok/s
Blended token price$1.118 / 1M$1.1843 / 1M
Typical route uptime95.55%93.09%

Visual comparison

Price and performance charts

ParasailPhala
500-token response by shared model

Estimated seconds using recent median response-start and output-speed data. Lower is better.

Parasail has the lower typical same-model response ratio across 10 measured models.

Blended token price by shared model

USD per 1 million tokens using a 1,000-input/500-output mix. Lower is better.

Parasail has the lower typical price ratio across 10 priced shared models.

Shared text models

10 exact models · newest first

ModelParasailPhala
GLM 5.2Winner · Parasail

z-ai/glm-5.2

Parasail
Blended price
$2.4 / 1M
500-token response
8.10 s
Response starts
0.96 s
Output speed
70.0 tok/s
Route uptime
98.80%
Context
262.1K
Route
parasail/fp4
Phala
Blended price
$2.4 / 1M
500-token response
16.81 s
Response starts
2.10 s
Output speed
34.0 tok/s
Route uptime
86.82%
Context
1M
Route
phala
Kimi K2.6Winner · Parasail

moonshotai/kimi-k2.6

Parasail
Blended price
$1.6667 / 1M
500-token response
16.21 s
Response starts
1.50 s
Output speed
34.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.45%
Context
262.1K
Route
parasail/int4
Phala
Blended price
$2.26 / 1M
500-token response
27.84 s
Response starts
2.84 s
Output speed
20.0 tok/s
Route uptime
N/a
Context
262.1K
Route
phala
GLM 5.1Winner · Parasail

z-ai/glm-5.1

Parasail
Blended price
$2.4 / 1M
500-token response
8.43 s
Response starts
2.18 s
Output speed
80.0 tok/s
Route uptime
85.33%
Context
202.8K
Route
parasail/fp8
Phala
Blended price
$2.2067 / 1M
500-token response
38.16 s
Response starts
22.53 s
Output speed
32.0 tok/s
Route uptime
N/a
Context
202.8K
Route
phala
Gemma 4 31BWinner · Parasail

google/gemma-4-31b-it

Parasail
Blended price
$0.2333 / 1M
500-token response
29.80 s
Response starts
2.03 s
Output speed
18.0 tok/s
Route uptime
92.85%
Context
262.1K
Route
parasail/fp8
Phala
Blended price
$0.2533 / 1M
500-token response
53.66 s
Response starts
3.66 s
Output speed
10.0 tok/s
Route uptime
52.78%
Context
262.1K
Route
phala
Qwen3.5 397B A17BWinner · Parasail

qwen/qwen3.5-397b-a17b

Parasail
Blended price
$1.5333 / 1M
500-token response
9.08 s
Response starts
0.75 s
Output speed
60.0 tok/s
Route uptime
87.58%
Context
262.1K
Route
parasail/fp8
Phala
Blended price
$1.5333 / 1M
500-token response
28.75 s
Response starts
3.75 s
Output speed
20.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.36%
Context
262.1K
Route
phala
MiniMax M2.5Winner · Parasail

minimax/minimax-m2.5

Parasail
Blended price
$0.6 / 1M
500-token response
5.17 s
Response starts
0.61 s
Output speed
109.5 tok/s
Route uptime
N/a
Context
196.6K
Route
parasail/fp8
Phala
Blended price
$0.5933 / 1M
500-token response
15.91 s
Response starts
2.02 s
Output speed
36.0 tok/s
Route uptime
N/a
Context
196.6K
Route
phala
GLM 5Winner · Parasail

z-ai/glm-5

Parasail
Blended price
$1.7333 / 1M
500-token response
19.93 s
Response starts
0.70 s
Output speed
26.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.15%
Context
202.8K
Route
parasail/fp8
Phala
Blended price
$1.9667 / 1M
500-token response
22.96 s
Response starts
2.96 s
Output speed
25.0 tok/s
Route uptime
N/a
Context
202.8K
Route
phala
gpt-oss-120bWinner · Parasail

openai/gpt-oss-120b

Parasail
Blended price
$0.3167 / 1M
500-token response
9.13 s
Response starts
0.51 s
Output speed
58.0 tok/s
Route uptime
92.57%
Context
131.1K
Route
parasail/fp4
Phala
Blended price
$0.3 / 1M
500-token response
12.10 s
Response starts
0.74 s
Output speed
44.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.76%
Context
131.1K
Route
phala
gpt-oss-20bWinner · Phala

openai/gpt-oss-20b

Parasail
Blended price
$0.0933 / 1M
500-token response
8.09 s
Response starts
0.52 s
Output speed
66.0 tok/s
Route uptime
98.25%
Context
131.1K
Route
parasail/fp4
Phala
Blended price
$0.0767 / 1M
500-token response
9.39 s
Response starts
0.62 s
Output speed
57.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.78%
Context
131.1K
Route
phala
Gemma 3 27BWinner · Parasail

google/gemma-3-27b-it

Parasail
Blended price
$0.2033 / 1M
500-token response
16.21 s
Response starts
0.58 s
Output speed
32.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.99%
Context
131.1K
Route
parasail/fp8
Phala
Blended price
$0.2533 / 1M
500-token response
73.29 s
Response starts
1.86 s
Output speed
7.0 tok/s
Route uptime
44.04%
Context
262.1K
Route
phala

A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated . Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.

Parasail vs Phala analysis

How Parasail and Phala compare for AI inference

Parasail and Phala share 10 indexed text models, including GLM 5.2, Kimi K2.6, GLM 5.1, Gemma 4 31B, Qwen3.5 397B A17B. Parasail has the stronger typical response-time result on the directly measured set.

Same-model speed evidence

10 shared models currently have complete response-start and output-speed measurements on both providers. The speed comparison uses per-model ratios before taking the median, so naturally faster model catalogs do not improve the result.

Token pricing on one workload

10 shared models have complete input and output prices on both providers. Prices use the same 1,000-input/500-output-token mix and are normalized to one million tokens for readability.

Catalog and deployment differences

Parasail has 35 indexed models and lists no published server regions; Phala has 18 models and lists no regions. Verify data residency, privacy terms, limits, and production latency directly before choosing.

Related same-model benchmarks

Compare with other providers

Explore qualified alternatives with the most shared measured models. Recommendations include comparisons for both Parasail and Phala.