SiliconFlow
36 indexed models
- Headquarters
Singapore
- Server regions
United States
- Model types
- 35 text, 1 embeddings
Start typing to search.
Same-model provider benchmark
Compare SiliconFlow and StreamLake on 12 exact shared text models. ProviderBench keeps speed, price, and catalog coverage separate so naturally faster model catalogs cannot distort the result.
36 indexed models
20 indexed models
At a glance
There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.
Fastest on shared models
1.16× typical advantage
12 exact models with complete recent speed data
Lowest token cost
$0.9216 / 1M
12 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix
Most models available
36 models
Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities
| Metric | SiliconFlow | StreamLake |
|---|---|---|
| Typical 500-token response | 23.05 s | 21.46 s |
| Typical response start | 1.91 s | 2.41 s |
| Typical output speed | 23.5 tok/s | 27.0 tok/s |
| Blended token price | $1.1103 / 1M | $0.9216 / 1M |
| Typical route uptime | 98.57% | 99.48% |
Visual comparison
Estimated seconds using recent median response-start and output-speed data. Lower is better.
StreamLake has the lower typical same-model response ratio across 12 measured models.
USD per 1 million tokens using a 1,000-input/500-output mix. Lower is better.
StreamLake has the lower typical price ratio across 12 priced shared models.
| Model | SiliconFlow | StreamLake |
|---|---|---|
GLM 5.2Winner · StreamLake z-ai/glm-5.2 | SiliconFlow
| StreamLake
|
DeepSeek V4 ProWinner · StreamLake deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro | SiliconFlow
| StreamLake
|
DeepSeek V4 FlashWinner · StreamLake deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash | SiliconFlow
| StreamLake
|
Kimi K2.6Winner · StreamLake moonshotai/kimi-k2.6 | SiliconFlow
| StreamLake
|
GLM 5.1Winner · SiliconFlow z-ai/glm-5.1 | SiliconFlow
| StreamLake
|
MiniMax M2.5Winner · StreamLake minimax/minimax-m2.5 | SiliconFlow
| StreamLake
|
GLM 5Winner · StreamLake z-ai/glm-5 | SiliconFlow
| StreamLake
|
Kimi K2.5Winner · StreamLake moonshotai/kimi-k2.5 | SiliconFlow
| StreamLake
|
DeepSeek V3.2Winner · SiliconFlow deepseek/deepseek-v3.2 | SiliconFlow
| StreamLake
|
DeepSeek V3.1 TerminusWinner · StreamLake deepseek/deepseek-v3.1-terminus | SiliconFlow
| StreamLake
|
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Winner · SiliconFlow qwen/qwen3-30b-a3b-instruct-2507 | SiliconFlow
| StreamLake
|
R1 0528Winner · StreamLake deepseek/deepseek-r1-0528 | SiliconFlow
| StreamLake
|
A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated . Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.
SiliconFlow vs StreamLake analysis
SiliconFlow and StreamLake share 12 indexed text models, including GLM 5.2, DeepSeek V4 Pro, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Kimi K2.6, GLM 5.1. StreamLake has the stronger typical response-time result on the directly measured set.
12 shared models currently have complete response-start and output-speed measurements on both providers. The speed comparison uses per-model ratios before taking the median, so naturally faster model catalogs do not improve the result.
12 shared models have complete input and output prices on both providers. Prices use the same 1,000-input/500-output-token mix and are normalized to one million tokens for readability.
SiliconFlow has 36 indexed models and lists 1 published server region; StreamLake has 20 models and lists no regions. Verify data residency, privacy terms, limits, and production latency directly before choosing.
Related same-model benchmarks
Explore qualified alternatives with the most shared measured models. Recommendations include comparisons for both SiliconFlow and StreamLake.