Skip to content

Same-model provider benchmark

SiliconFlow vs Together: LLM provider comparison

Compare SiliconFlow and Together on 8 exact shared text models. ProviderBench keeps speed, price, and catalog coverage separate so naturally faster model catalogs cannot distort the result.

SiliconFlow

36 indexed models

Headquarters
Singapore
Server regions
United States
Model types
35 text, 1 embeddings

Together

19 indexed models

Headquarters
United States
Server regions
N/a
Model types
17 text, 2 transcription

At a glance

Metric winners

There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.

Fastest on shared models

3.41× typical advantage

8 exact models with complete recent speed data

Lowest token cost

$1.0464 / 1M

8 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix

Most models available

36 models

Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities

Shared-model benchmark summary

MetricSiliconFlowTogether
Typical 500-token response32.63 s8.79 s
Typical response start2.41 s0.54 s
Typical output speed17.0 tok/s61.0 tok/s
Blended token price$1.0464 / 1M$1.2571 / 1M
Typical route uptime97.23%94.55%

Visual comparison

Price and performance charts

SiliconFlowTogether
500-token response by shared model

Estimated seconds using recent median response-start and output-speed data. Lower is better.

Together has the lower typical same-model response ratio across 8 measured models.

Blended token price by shared model

USD per 1 million tokens using a 1,000-input/500-output mix. Lower is better.

SiliconFlow has the lower typical price ratio across 8 priced shared models.

Shared text models

8 exact models · newest first

ModelSiliconFlowTogether
GLM 5.2Winner · Together

z-ai/glm-5.2

SiliconFlow
Blended price
$2.232 / 1M
500-token response
20.11 s
Response starts
3.44 s
Output speed
30.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.96%
Context
1M
Route
siliconflow/fp8
Together
Blended price
$2.4 / 1M
500-token response
8.95 s
Response starts
0.88 s
Output speed
62.0 tok/s
Route uptime
94.55%
Context
262.1K
Route
together
Kimi K2.7 CodeWinner · Together

moonshotai/kimi-k2.7-code

SiliconFlow
Blended price
$1.8394 / 1M
500-token response
15.76 s
Response starts
1.48 s
Output speed
35.0 tok/s
Route uptime
97.48%
Context
262.1K
Route
siliconflow/fp8
Together
Blended price
$1.9667 / 1M
500-token response
3.47 s
Response starts
0.49 s
Output speed
168.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.29%
Context
262.1K
Route
together
DeepSeek V4 ProWinner · Together

deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro

SiliconFlow
Blended price
$2.0461 / 1M
500-token response
23.66 s
Response starts
1.92 s
Output speed
23.0 tok/s
Route uptime
95.13%
Context
1M
Route
siliconflow/fp8
Together
Blended price
$2.32 / 1M
500-token response
16.18 s
Response starts
0.56 s
Output speed
32.0 tok/s
Route uptime
93.72%
Context
512K
Route
together
Kimi K2.6Winner · Together

moonshotai/kimi-k2.6

SiliconFlow
Blended price
$1.6467 / 1M
500-token response
37.63 s
Response starts
4.29 s
Output speed
15.0 tok/s
Route uptime
97.23%
Context
262.1K
Route
siliconflow/fp8
Together
Blended price
$2.3 / 1M
500-token response
5.21 s
Response starts
0.54 s
Output speed
107.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.73%
Context
262.1K
Route
together
Gemma 4 31BWinner · Together

google/gemma-4-31b-it

SiliconFlow
Blended price
$0.22 / 1M
500-token response
54.85 s
Response starts
13.19 s
Output speed
12.0 tok/s
Route uptime
40.07%
Context
262.1K
Route
siliconflow/fp8
Together
Blended price
$0.4733 / 1M
500-token response
24.13 s
Response starts
2.39 s
Output speed
23.0 tok/s
Route uptime
83.73%
Context
262.1K
Route
together
Qwen3.5-9BWinner · Together

qwen/qwen3.5-9b

SiliconFlow
Blended price
$0.1167 / 1M
500-token response
27.64 s
Response starts
1.33 s
Output speed
19.0 tok/s
Route uptime
98.63%
Context
262.1K
Route
siliconflow/fp8
Together
Blended price
$0.1967 / 1M
500-token response
12.73 s
Response starts
0.54 s
Output speed
41.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.00%
Context
262.1K
Route
together
gpt-oss-120bWinner · Together

openai/gpt-oss-120b

SiliconFlow
Blended price
$0.1833 / 1M
500-token response
44.57 s
Response starts
2.90 s
Output speed
12.0 tok/s
Route uptime
64.12%
Context
131.1K
Route
siliconflow/fp8
Together
Blended price
$0.3 / 1M
500-token response
8.63 s
Response starts
0.30 s
Output speed
60.0 tok/s
Route uptime
93.50%
Context
131.1K
Route
together
gpt-oss-20bWinner · Together

openai/gpt-oss-20b

SiliconFlow
Blended price
$0.0867 / 1M
500-token response
42.99 s
Response starts
1.33 s
Output speed
12.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.35%
Context
131.1K
Route
siliconflow/fp8
Together
Blended price
$0.1 / 1M
500-token response
2.95 s
Response starts
0.23 s
Output speed
184.0 tok/s
Route uptime
N/a
Context
131.1K
Route
together

A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated . Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.

SiliconFlow vs Together analysis

How SiliconFlow and Together compare for AI inference

SiliconFlow and Together share 8 indexed text models, including GLM 5.2, Kimi K2.7 Code, DeepSeek V4 Pro, Kimi K2.6, Gemma 4 31B. Together has the stronger typical response-time result on the directly measured set.

Same-model speed evidence

8 shared models currently have complete response-start and output-speed measurements on both providers. The speed comparison uses per-model ratios before taking the median, so naturally faster model catalogs do not improve the result.

Token pricing on one workload

8 shared models have complete input and output prices on both providers. Prices use the same 1,000-input/500-output-token mix and are normalized to one million tokens for readability.

Catalog and deployment differences

SiliconFlow has 36 indexed models and lists 1 published server region; Together has 19 models and lists no regions. Verify data residency, privacy terms, limits, and production latency directly before choosing.