SiliconFlow
36 indexed models
- Headquarters
Singapore
- Server regions
United States
- Model types
- 35 text, 1 embeddings
Start typing to search.
Same-model provider benchmark
Compare SiliconFlow and Z.ai on 4 exact shared text models. ProviderBench keeps speed, price, and catalog coverage separate so naturally faster model catalogs cannot distort the result.
36 indexed models
11 indexed models
At a glance
There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.
Fastest on shared models
1.26× typical advantage
4 exact models with complete recent speed data
Lowest token cost
$1.5338 / 1M
4 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix
Most models available
36 models
Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities
| Metric | SiliconFlow | Z.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Typical 500-token response | 23.70 s | 27.72 s |
| Typical response start | 2.87 s | 5.79 s |
| Typical output speed | 25.5 tok/s | 22.5 tok/s |
| Blended token price | $1.5338 / 1M | $1.7583 / 1M |
| Typical route uptime | 99.64% | 91.81% |
Visual comparison
Estimated seconds using recent median response-start and output-speed data. Lower is better.
SiliconFlow has the lower typical same-model response ratio across 4 measured models.
USD per 1 million tokens using a 1,000-input/500-output mix. Lower is better.
SiliconFlow has the lower typical price ratio across 4 priced shared models.
| Model | SiliconFlow | Z.ai |
|---|---|---|
GLM 5.2Winner · SiliconFlow z-ai/glm-5.2 | SiliconFlow
| Z.ai
|
GLM 5.1Winner · SiliconFlow z-ai/glm-5.1 | SiliconFlow
| Z.ai
|
GLM 5Winner · SiliconFlow z-ai/glm-5 | SiliconFlow
| Z.ai
|
GLM 4.5 AirWinner · SiliconFlow z-ai/glm-4.5-air | SiliconFlow
| Z.ai
|
A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated . Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.
SiliconFlow vs Z.ai analysis
SiliconFlow and Z.ai share 4 indexed text models, including GLM 5.2, GLM 5.1, GLM 5, GLM 4.5 Air. SiliconFlow has the stronger typical response-time result on the directly measured set.
4 shared models currently have complete response-start and output-speed measurements on both providers. The speed comparison uses per-model ratios before taking the median, so naturally faster model catalogs do not improve the result.
4 shared models have complete input and output prices on both providers. Prices use the same 1,000-input/500-output-token mix and are normalized to one million tokens for readability.
SiliconFlow has 36 indexed models and lists 1 published server region; Z.ai has 11 models and lists 1 region. Verify data residency, privacy terms, limits, and production latency directly before choosing.
Related same-model benchmarks
Explore qualified alternatives with the most shared measured models. Recommendations include comparisons for both SiliconFlow and Z.ai.