Skip to content

AI inference providers from United States

LLM Providers from United States: Leaderboard & Inference Benchmarks

Compare providers headquartered in United States using observed inference speed, model availability, and published datacenter coverage.

Headquarters:
United States
Providers:
48
With speed data:
28

Fastest LLM providers from United States

Ranks are recalculated within United States from each provider’s same-model normalized speed score. A provider needs at least three exact models measured on another provider; raw catalog speed remains visible for providers without a rank.

Showing 31 providers

LLM Providers: Speed Leaderboard & Benchmarks
PositionProviderSpeed measurementsData coverage
Rank
#1
Speed measurements
Output speed ↗
318.0 tok/s
Data coverage
Models offered
11
Speed measured
5
Shared comparisons
5
Rating basis
Based on shared models
#2Speed measurements
Data coverage
Models offered
5
Speed measured
5
Shared comparisons
5
Rating basis
Based on shared models
#3Speed measurements
Data coverage
Models offered
3
Speed measured
3
Shared comparisons
3
Rating basis
Based on shared models
#4Speed measurements
Data coverage
Models offered
6
Speed measured
6
Shared comparisons
6
Rating basis
Based on shared models
#5Speed measurements
Data coverage
Models offered
8
Speed measured
8
Shared comparisons
8
Rating basis
Based on shared models
#6Speed measurements
Output speed ↗
100.0 tok/s
Data coverage
Models offered
8
Speed measured
5
Shared comparisons
0
Rating basis
Based on own-model catalog
#7Speed measurements
Output speed ↗
148.0 tok/s
Data coverage
Models offered
4
Speed measured
4
Shared comparisons
4
Rating basis
Based on shared models
#8Speed measurements
Data coverage
Models offered
5
Speed measured
5
Shared comparisons
5
Rating basis
Based on shared models
#9Speed measurements
Output speed ↗
175.5 tok/s
Data coverage
Models offered
4
Speed measured
4
Shared comparisons
4
Rating basis
Based on shared models
#10Speed measurements
Data coverage
Models offered
19
Speed measured
15
Shared comparisons
15
Rating basis
Based on shared models
#11Speed measurements
Data coverage
Models offered
19
Speed measured
10
Shared comparisons
10
Rating basis
Based on shared models
#12Speed measurements
Data coverage
Models offered
3
Speed measured
3
Shared comparisons
3
Rating basis
Based on shared models
#13Speed measurements
Data coverage
Models offered
49
Speed measured
19
Shared comparisons
19
Rating basis
Based on shared models
#14Speed measurements
Data coverage
Models offered
23
Speed measured
8
Shared comparisons
8
Rating basis
Based on shared models
#15Speed measurements
Data coverage
Models offered
22
Speed measured
5
Shared comparisons
5
Rating basis
Based on shared models
#16Speed measurements
Data coverage
Models offered
72
Speed measured
5
Shared comparisons
5
Rating basis
Based on shared models
#17Speed measurements
Data coverage
Models offered
8
Speed measured
4
Shared comparisons
0
Rating basis
Based on own-model catalog
#18Speed measurements
Data coverage
Models offered
12
Speed measured
5
Shared comparisons
5
Rating basis
Based on shared models
#19Speed measurements
Data coverage
Models offered
15
Speed measured
11
Shared comparisons
11
Rating basis
Based on shared models
#20Speed measurements
Data coverage
Models offered
7
Speed measured
5
Shared comparisons
0
Rating basis
Based on own-model catalog
#21Speed measurements
Data coverage
Models offered
35
Speed measured
20
Shared comparisons
20
Rating basis
Based on shared models
#22Speed measurements
Data coverage
Models offered
3
Speed measured
3
Shared comparisons
3
Rating basis
Based on shared models
#23Speed measurements
Data coverage
Models offered
50
Speed measured
8
Shared comparisons
8
Rating basis
Based on shared models
#24Speed measurements
Data coverage
Models offered
87
Speed measured
31
Shared comparisons
31
Rating basis
Based on shared models
#25Speed measurements
Data coverage
Models offered
35
Speed measured
21
Shared comparisons
21
Rating basis
Based on shared models
#26Speed measurements
Data coverage
Models offered
7
Speed measured
5
Shared comparisons
5
Rating basis
Based on shared models
#27Speed measurements
Data coverage
Models offered
12
Speed measured
7
Shared comparisons
7
Rating basis
Based on shared models
#28Speed measurements
Data coverage
Models offered
67
Speed measured
31
Shared comparisons
31
Rating basis
Based on shared models
#29Speed measurements
Data coverage
Models offered
8
Speed measured
7
Shared comparisons
7
Rating basis
Based on shared models
#30Speed measurements
Data coverage
Models offered
18
Speed measured
13
Shared comparisons
13
Rating basis
Based on shared models
#31Speed measurements
Data coverage
Models offered
31
Speed measured
17
Shared comparisons
17
Rating basis
Based on shared models

See the complete methodology and worked rating example.

Inference market in United States

How to compare LLM providers from United States

This directory currently identifies 48 AI inference providers headquartered in United States, including Amazon Bedrock, Amazon Nova, Anthropic, Arcee AI. 28 providers have at least three shared model measurements and receive a local rank. The country view is useful for vendor discovery, but headquarters alone does not determine where inference requests are processed.

Current speed leader in United States

Groq currently ranks first among qualifying United States-headquartered providers. Its published catalog median estimates a 500-token response in 1.82 seconds across 5 measured models. Rankings change as OpenRouter publishes new observations.

Headquarters is not data residency

A company based in United States may operate infrastructure in several countries or rely on external hosting partners. Treat the headquarters filter as company-location information, then verify endpoint regions, privacy terms, subprocessors, and contractual residency guarantees before handling regulated or sensitive data.

Review published hosting regions

Providers on this page collectively publish 12 datacenter regions: eu-west-1, us-east-1, US, swedencentral, us-east-2, global, europe-west1, europe-west4, and others. Region availability can vary by model and route, so confirm the current deployment location with the selected provider.