Amazon Bedrock
23 indexed models
- Headquarters
United States
- Server regions
eu-west-1 · Ireland
us-east-1 · United States
- Model types
- 23 text
Start typing to search.
Same-model provider benchmark
Compare Amazon Bedrock and Azure on 10 exact shared text models. ProviderBench keeps speed, price, and catalog coverage separate so naturally faster model catalogs cannot distort the result.
23 indexed models
50 indexed models
At a glance
There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.
Fastest on shared models
1.34× typical advantage
7 exact models with complete recent speed data
Lowest token cost
Equal result
Tie
10 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix
Most models available
50 models
Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities
| Metric | Amazon Bedrock | Azure |
|---|---|---|
| Typical 500-token response | 12.59 s | 17.24 s |
| Typical response start | 2.66 s | 3.70 s |
| Typical output speed | 45.0 tok/s | 35.0 tok/s |
| Blended token price | $12.6 / 1M | $12.6 / 1M |
| Typical route uptime | 99.66% | 99.72% |
Visual comparison
Estimated seconds using recent median response-start and output-speed data. Lower is better.
Amazon Bedrock has the lower typical same-model response ratio across 7 measured models.
USD per 1 million tokens using a 1,000-input/500-output mix. Lower is better.
Neither provider has a clear token-price advantage.
| Model | Amazon Bedrock | Azure |
|---|---|---|
Claude Sonnet 5Winner · Azure anthropic/claude-sonnet-5 | Amazon Bedrock
| Azure
|
anthropic/claude-fable-5 | Amazon Bedrock
| Azure
|
Claude Opus 4.8Winner · Azure anthropic/claude-opus-4.8 | Amazon Bedrock
| Azure
|
Claude Opus 4.7Winner · Amazon Bedrock anthropic/claude-opus-4.7 | Amazon Bedrock
| Azure
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6Winner · Azure anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6 | Amazon Bedrock
| Azure
|
Claude Opus 4.6Winner · Amazon Bedrock anthropic/claude-opus-4.6 | Amazon Bedrock
| Azure
|
anthropic/claude-opus-4.5 | Amazon Bedrock
| Azure
|
Claude Haiku 4.5Winner · Amazon Bedrock anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5 | Amazon Bedrock
| Azure
|
anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5 | Amazon Bedrock
| Azure
|
Claude Opus 4.1Winner · Amazon Bedrock anthropic/claude-opus-4.1 | Amazon Bedrock
| Azure
|
A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated . Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.
Amazon Bedrock vs Azure analysis
Amazon Bedrock and Azure share 10 indexed text models, including Claude Sonnet 5, Claude Fable 5, Claude Opus 4.8, Claude Opus 4.7, Claude Sonnet 4.6. Amazon Bedrock has the stronger typical response-time result on the directly measured set.
7 shared models currently have complete response-start and output-speed measurements on both providers. The speed comparison uses per-model ratios before taking the median, so naturally faster model catalogs do not improve the result.
10 shared models have complete input and output prices on both providers. Prices use the same 1,000-input/500-output-token mix and are normalized to one million tokens for readability.
Amazon Bedrock has 23 indexed models and lists 2 published server regions; Azure has 50 models and lists 2 regions. Verify data residency, privacy terms, limits, and production latency directly before choosing.
Related same-model benchmarks
Explore qualified alternatives with the most shared measured models. Recommendations include comparisons for both Amazon Bedrock and Azure.
12 shared model benchmarks
29 shared model benchmarks
10 shared model benchmarks
4 shared model benchmarks
3 shared model benchmarks
3 shared model benchmarks