Amazon Bedrock
23 indexed models
- Headquarters
United States- Server regions
eu-west-1 · Irelandus-east-1 · United States- Model types
- 23 text
Same-model provider benchmark
Amazon Bedrock vs SiliconFlow: LLM provider comparison
Compare Amazon Bedrock and SiliconFlow on 4 exact shared text models. ProviderBench keeps speed, price, and catalog coverage separate so naturally faster model catalogs cannot distort the result.
SiliconFlow
36 indexed models
- Headquarters
Singapore- Server regions
- United States
- Model types
- 35 text, 1 embeddings
At a glance
Metric winners
There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.
Fastest on shared models
12.41× typical advantage
3 exact models with complete recent speed data
Lowest token cost
$0.4733 / 1M
4 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix
Most models available
36 models
Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities
Shared-model benchmark summary
| Metric | Amazon Bedrock | SiliconFlow |
|---|---|---|
| Typical 500-token response | 3.59 s | 42.99 s |
| Typical response start | 1.55 s | 2.90 s |
| Typical output speed | 207.0 tok/s | 12.0 tok/s |
| Blended token price | $0.6075 / 1M | $0.4733 / 1M |
| Typical route uptime | 99.94% | 99.35% |
Visual comparison
Price and performance charts
Amazon BedrockSiliconFlowEstimated seconds using recent median response-start and output-speed data. Lower is better.
Amazon Bedrock has the lower typical same-model response ratio across 3 measured models.
USD per 1 million tokens using a 1,000-input/500-output mix. Lower is better.
SiliconFlow has the lower typical price ratio across 4 priced shared models.
| Model | Amazon Bedrock | SiliconFlow |
|---|---|---|
 GLM 5Winner · Amazon Bedrock z-ai/glm-5 | Amazon Bedrock
| SiliconFlow
|
 gpt-oss-120bWinner · Amazon Bedrock openai/gpt-oss-120b | Amazon Bedrock
| SiliconFlow
|
gpt-oss-20bWinner · Amazon Bedrock openai/gpt-oss-20b | Amazon Bedrock
| SiliconFlow
|
 qwen/qwen3-coder-30b-a3b-instruct | Amazon Bedrock
| SiliconFlow
|
A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated . Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.
Amazon Bedrock vs SiliconFlow analysis
How Amazon Bedrock and SiliconFlow compare for AI inference
Amazon Bedrock and SiliconFlow share 4 indexed text models, including GLM 5, gpt-oss-120b, gpt-oss-20b, Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct. Amazon Bedrock has the stronger typical response-time result on the directly measured set.
Same-model speed evidence
3 shared models currently have complete response-start and output-speed measurements on both providers. The speed comparison uses per-model ratios before taking the median, so naturally faster model catalogs do not improve the result.
Token pricing on one workload
4 shared models have complete input and output prices on both providers. Prices use the same 1,000-input/500-output-token mix and are normalized to one million tokens for readability.
Catalog and deployment differences
Amazon Bedrock has 23 indexed models and lists 2 published server regions; SiliconFlow has 36 models and lists 1 region. Verify data residency, privacy terms, limits, and production latency directly before choosing.
Related same-model benchmarks
Compare with other providers
Explore qualified alternatives with the most shared measured models. Recommendations include comparisons for both Amazon Bedrock and SiliconFlow.
Amazon Bedrock vs Google Vertex
12 shared model benchmarks
SiliconFlow vs NovitaAI
24 shared model benchmarks
Amazon Bedrock vs Anthropic
10 shared model benchmarks
SiliconFlow vs DeepInfra
23 shared model benchmarks
Amazon Bedrock vs Azure
7 shared model benchmarks
SiliconFlow vs AtlasCloud
17 shared model benchmarks