Ambient vs Weights & Biases: LLM provider comparison

At a glance

Metric winners

There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.

Fastest on shared models

W&Weights & Biases

1.61× typical advantage

3 exact models with complete recent speed data

Lowest token cost

W&Weights & Biases

$1.5133 / 1M

3 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix

Most models available

W&Weights & Biases

19 models

Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities

Shared-model benchmark summary

Metric	AAmbient☆☆☆☆☆(0)	W&Weights & Biases☆☆☆☆☆(0)
Speed	Ambient9.10 s	Weights & Biases5.65 s
TTFT	Ambient0.54 s	Weights & Biases0.40 s
TPS	Ambient58.0 tok/s	Weights & Biases94.0 tok/s
Price	Ambient$1.6333 / 1M	Weights & Biases$1.5133 / 1M
Uptime	Ambient99.78%	Weights & Biases99.88%

Model	AAmbient☆☆☆☆☆(0)	W&Weights & Biases☆☆☆☆☆(0)
ZA GLM 5.2Winner · Weights & Biases	Ambient Price— Best comparable value $2.1667 / 1M Speed— Worst comparable value 7.58 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 0.54 s TPS— Worst comparable value 71.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 99.78% Context 101.4K Route ambient/fp8	Weights & Biases Price— Worst comparable value $2.3933 / 1M Speed— Best comparable value 5.25 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.40 s TPS— Best comparable value 103.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 99.95% Context 262.1K Route wandb/fp4
M Kimi K2.7 CodeWinner · Weights & Biases	Ambient Price— Worst comparable value $2.1333 / 1M Speed— Worst comparable value 9.10 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 0.48 s TPS— Worst comparable value 58.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 100.00% Context 262.1K Route ambient/int4	Weights & Biases Price— Best comparable value $1.96 / 1M Speed— Best comparable value 5.65 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.33 s TPS— Best comparable value 94.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 99.63% Context 262.1K Route wandb/int4
D DeepSeek V4 FlashWinner · Weights & Biases	Ambient Price— Worst comparable value $0.6 / 1M Speed— Worst comparable value 42.52 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 0.85 s TPS— Worst comparable value 12.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 98.98% Context 1M Route ambient/fp4	Weights & Biases Price— Best comparable value $0.1867 / 1M Speed— Best comparable value 13.88 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.72 s TPS— Best comparable value 38.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 99.88% Context 1M Route wandb/fp8

A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated Jul 18, 2026, 9:18 AM UTC. Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.