Skip to content
ProviderBench home

Same-model provider benchmark

AtlasCloud vs Together: LLM provider comparison

Compare AtlasCloud and Together on 6 exact shared text models. ProviderBench keeps speed, price, and catalog coverage separate so naturally faster model catalogs cannot distort the result.

AtlasCloud

31 indexed models

Headquarters
United States
Server regions
N/a
Model types
26 text, 5 video

Together

19 indexed models

Headquarters
United States
Server regions
N/a
Model types
17 text, 2 transcription

At a glance

Metric winners

There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.

Fastest on shared models

Together

2.59× typical advantage

6 exact models with complete recent speed data

Lowest token cost

AtlasCloud

$1.59 / 1M

6 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix

Most models available

AtlasCloud

31 models

Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities

Shared-model benchmark summary

MetricAtlasCloudTogether
Typical 500-token response16.32 s6.18 s
Typical response start1.77 s0.55 s
Typical output speed35.0 tok/s92.5 tok/s
Blended token price$1.59 / 1M$1.6978 / 1M
Typical route uptime97.90%98.82%

Visual comparison

Price and performance charts

AtlasCloudTogether
500-token response by shared model

Estimated seconds using recent median response-start and output-speed data. Lower is better.

Together has the lower typical same-model response ratio across 6 measured models.

Blended token price by shared model

USD per 1 million tokens using a 1,000-input/500-output mix. Lower is better.

AtlasCloud has the lower typical price ratio across 6 priced shared models.

Shared text models

6 exact models · newest first

ModelAtlasCloudTogether
GLM 5.2Winner · Together

z-ai/glm-5.2

AtlasCloud
Blended price
$2.16 / 1M
500-token response
15.37 s
Response starts
1.86 s
Output speed
37.0 tok/s
Route uptime
98.60%
Context
1M
Route
atlas-cloud/fp8
Together
Blended price
$2.4 / 1M
500-token response
8.95 s
Response starts
0.88 s
Output speed
62.0 tok/s
Route uptime
94.55%
Context
262.1K
Route
together
Kimi K2.7 CodeWinner · Together

moonshotai/kimi-k2.7-code

AtlasCloud
Blended price
$1.9667 / 1M
500-token response
17.69 s
Response starts
1.30 s
Output speed
30.5 tok/s
Route uptime
N/a
Context
262.1K
Route
atlas-cloud/int4
Together
Blended price
$1.9667 / 1M
500-token response
3.47 s
Response starts
0.49 s
Output speed
168.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.29%
Context
262.1K
Route
together
MiniMax M3Winner · Together

minimax/minimax-m3

AtlasCloud
Blended price
$0.6 / 1M
500-token response
12.16 s
Response starts
1.05 s
Output speed
45.0 tok/s
Route uptime
97.90%
Context
524.3K
Route
atlas-cloud/fp8
Together
Blended price
$0.6 / 1M
500-token response
7.16 s
Response starts
0.75 s
Output speed
78.0 tok/s
Route uptime
98.82%
Context
524.3K
Route
together
DeepSeek V4 ProWinner · AtlasCloud

deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro

AtlasCloud
Blended price
$2.2467 / 1M
500-token response
16.69 s
Response starts
2.40 s
Output speed
35.0 tok/s
Route uptime
93.58%
Context
1M
Route
atlas-cloud/fp4
Together
Blended price
$2.32 / 1M
500-token response
16.18 s
Response starts
0.56 s
Output speed
32.0 tok/s
Route uptime
93.72%
Context
512K
Route
together
Kimi K2.6Winner · Together

moonshotai/kimi-k2.6

AtlasCloud
Blended price
$1.9667 / 1M
500-token response
23.39 s
Response starts
4.16 s
Output speed
26.0 tok/s
Route uptime
96.35%
Context
262.1K
Route
atlas-cloud/int4
Together
Blended price
$2.3 / 1M
500-token response
5.21 s
Response starts
0.54 s
Output speed
107.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.73%
Context
262.1K
Route
together
MiniMax M2.7Winner · Together

minimax/minimax-m2.7

AtlasCloud
Blended price
$0.6 / 1M
500-token response
15.96 s
Response starts
1.67 s
Output speed
35.0 tok/s
Route uptime
98.00%
Context
196.6K
Route
atlas-cloud/fp8
Together
Blended price
$0.6 / 1M
500-token response
4.62 s
Response starts
0.52 s
Output speed
122.0 tok/s
Route uptime
98.83%
Context
196.6K
Route
together/fp4

A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated . Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.

AtlasCloud vs Together analysis

How AtlasCloud and Together compare for AI inference

AtlasCloud and Together share 6 indexed text models, including GLM 5.2, Kimi K2.7 Code, MiniMax M3, DeepSeek V4 Pro, Kimi K2.6. Together has the stronger typical response-time result on the directly measured set.

Same-model speed evidence

6 shared models currently have complete response-start and output-speed measurements on both providers. The speed comparison uses per-model ratios before taking the median, so naturally faster model catalogs do not improve the result.

Token pricing on one workload

6 shared models have complete input and output prices on both providers. Prices use the same 1,000-input/500-output-token mix and are normalized to one million tokens for readability.

Catalog and deployment differences

AtlasCloud has 31 indexed models and lists no published server regions; Together has 19 models and lists no regions. Verify data residency, privacy terms, limits, and production latency directly before choosing.

Related same-model benchmarks

Compare with other providers

Explore qualified alternatives with the most shared measured models. Recommendations include comparisons for both AtlasCloud and Together.

AtlasCloud vs DeepInfra

22 shared model benchmarks

Together vs NovitaAI

10 shared model benchmarks

AtlasCloud vs SiliconFlow

17 shared model benchmarks

Together vs Parasail

10 shared model benchmarks

AtlasCloud vs Venice

16 shared model benchmarks

Together vs Weights & Biases

8 shared model benchmarks