Skip to content

Same-model provider benchmark

AtlasCloud vs Wafer: LLM provider comparison

Compare AtlasCloud and Wafer on 3 exact shared text models. ProviderBench keeps speed, price, and catalog coverage separate so naturally faster model catalogs cannot distort the result.

AtlasCloud

32 indexed models

Headquarters
United States
Server regions
N/a
Model types
27 text, 5 video

Wafer

3 indexed models

Headquarters
United States
Server regions
N/a
Model types
3 text

At a glance

Metric winners

There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.

Fastest on shared models

1.02× typical advantage

3 exact models with complete recent speed data

Lowest token cost

$1.9111 / 1M

3 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix

Most models available

32 models

Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities

Shared-model benchmark summary

MetricAtlasCloud(0)Wafer(0)
SpeedAtlasCloud14.58 sWafer14.75 s
TTFTAtlasCloud1.50 sWafer4.95 s
TPSAtlasCloud41.0 tok/sWafer53.0 tok/s
UptimeAtlasCloud99.08%Wafer100.00%
BlendedAtlasCloud$2.1889 / 1MWafer$1.9111 / 1M
Green value Better comparable resultRed value Worse comparable result

Visual comparison

Price and performance charts

AtlasCloudWafer
500-token response by shared model

Estimated seconds using recent median response-start and output-speed data. Lower is better.

Wafer has the lower typical same-model response ratio across 3 measured models.

Blended token price by shared model

USD per 1 million tokens using a 1,000-input/500-output mix. Lower is better.

Wafer has the lower typical price ratio across 3 priced shared models.

Shared text models

3 exact models · newest first

ModelAtlasCloud(0)Wafer(0)
GLM 5.2Winner · Wafer
AtlasCloud
Speed— Worst comparable value
13.70 s
TTFT— Best comparable value
1.50 s
TPS— Worst comparable value
41.0 tok/s
Uptime— Worst comparable value
99.08%
Context
1M
Route
atlas-cloud/fp8
Blended— Best comparable value
$2.16 / 1M
Wafer
Speed— Best comparable value
9.16 s
TTFT— Worst comparable value
2.41 s
TPS— Best comparable value
74.0 tok/s
Uptime— Best comparable value
100.00%
Context
1M
Route
wafer/fp4
Blended— Worst comparable value
$2.4 / 1M
DeepSeek V4 ProWinner · Wafer
AtlasCloud
Speed— Worst comparable value
15.05 s
TTFT— Best comparable value
2.86 s
TPS— Worst comparable value
41.0 tok/s
Uptime— Worst comparable value
93.23%
Context
1M
Route
atlas-cloud/fp4
Blended— Worst comparable value
$2.2467 / 1M
Wafer
Speed— Best comparable value
14.75 s
TTFT— Worst comparable value
4.95 s
TPS— Best comparable value
51.0 tok/s
Uptime— Best comparable value
99.28%
Context
1M
Route
wafer/fp4
Blended— Best comparable value
$1.6 / 1M
GLM 5.1Winner · Wafer
AtlasCloud
Speed— Best comparable value
14.58 s
TTFT— Best comparable value
1.42 s
TPS— Worst comparable value
38.0 tok/s
Uptime— Worst comparable value
99.43%
Context
202.8K
Route
atlas-cloud/fp8
Blended— Worst comparable value
$2.16 / 1M
Wafer
Speed— Worst comparable value
15.15 s
TTFT— Worst comparable value
5.71 s
TPS— Best comparable value
53.0 tok/s
Uptime— Best comparable value
100.00%
Context
202.8K
Route
wafer/fp4
Blended— Best comparable value
$1.7333 / 1M

A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated . Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.

AtlasCloud vs Wafer analysis

How AtlasCloud and Wafer compare for AI inference

AtlasCloud and Wafer share 3 indexed text models, including GLM 5.2, DeepSeek V4 Pro, GLM 5.1. Wafer has the stronger typical response-time result on the directly measured set.

Same-model speed evidence

3 shared models currently have complete response-start and output-speed measurements on both providers. The speed comparison uses per-model ratios before taking the median, so naturally faster model catalogs do not improve the result.

Token pricing on one workload

3 shared models have complete input and output prices on both providers. Prices use the same 1,000-input/500-output-token mix and are normalized to one million tokens for readability.

Catalog and deployment differences

AtlasCloud has 32 indexed models and lists no published server regions; Wafer has 3 models and lists no regions. Verify data residency, privacy terms, limits, and production latency directly before choosing.