Skip to content

Same-model provider benchmark

Baidu Qianfan vs Venice: LLM provider comparison

Compare Baidu Qianfan and Venice on 7 exact shared text models. ProviderBench keeps speed, price, and catalog coverage separate so naturally faster model catalogs cannot distort the result.

Baidu Qianfan

7 indexed models

Headquarters
China
Server regions
N/a
Model types
7 text

Venice

29 indexed models

Headquarters
United States
Server regions
United States
Model types
29 text

At a glance

Metric winners

There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.

Fastest on shared models

1.53× typical advantage

7 exact models with complete recent speed data

Lowest token cost

$1.0826 / 1M

7 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix

Most models available

29 models

Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities

Shared-model benchmark summary

MetricBaidu QianfanVenice
Typical 500-token response13.46 s14.61 s
Typical response start1.04 s1.43 s
Typical output speed40.0 tok/s38.0 tok/s
Blended token price$1.0826 / 1M$1.6006 / 1M
Typical route uptime99.44%99.31%

Visual comparison

Price and performance charts

Baidu QianfanVenice
500-token response by shared model

Estimated seconds using recent median response-start and output-speed data. Lower is better.

Baidu Qianfan has the lower typical same-model response ratio across 7 measured models.

Blended token price by shared model

USD per 1 million tokens using a 1,000-input/500-output mix. Lower is better.

Baidu Qianfan has the lower typical price ratio across 7 priced shared models.

Shared text models

7 exact models · newest first

ModelBaidu QianfanVenice
GLM 5.2Winner · Baidu Qianfan

z-ai/glm-5.2

Baidu Qianfan
Blended price
$1.67 / 1M
500-token response
11.25 s
Response starts
1.05 s
Output speed
49.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.53%
Context
1M
Route
baidu/fp8
Venice
Blended price
$2.4 / 1M
500-token response
14.33 s
Response starts
1.17 s
Output speed
38.0 tok/s
Route uptime
94.48%
Context
1M
Route
venice/fp8
DeepSeek V4 ProWinner · Baidu Qianfan

deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro

Baidu Qianfan
Blended price
$0.9937 / 1M
500-token response
12.62 s
Response starts
1.26 s
Output speed
44.0 tok/s
Route uptime
98.14%
Context
1M
Route
baidu/fp8
Venice
Blended price
$2.2003 / 1M
500-token response
28.55 s
Response starts
2.23 s
Output speed
19.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.91%
Context
1M
Route
venice
DeepSeek V4 FlashWinner · Baidu Qianfan

deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Baidu Qianfan
Blended price
$0.1311 / 1M
500-token response
7.67 s
Response starts
0.72 s
Output speed
72.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.77%
Context
1M
Route
baidu/fp8
Venice
Blended price
$0.1837 / 1M
500-token response
14.58 s
Response starts
2.08 s
Output speed
40.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.58%
Context
1M
Route
venice
Kimi K2.6Winner · Venice

moonshotai/kimi-k2.6

Baidu Qianfan
Blended price
$1.596 / 1M
500-token response
14.79 s
Response starts
0.90 s
Output speed
36.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.34%
Context
262.1K
Route
baidu/fp4
Venice
Blended price
$1.6667 / 1M
500-token response
12.06 s
Response starts
1.43 s
Output speed
47.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.22%
Context
256K
Route
venice/int4
GLM 5.1Winner · Baidu Qianfan

z-ai/glm-5.1

Baidu Qianfan
Blended price
$1.68 / 1M
500-token response
16.87 s
Response starts
1.24 s
Output speed
32.0 tok/s
Route uptime
79.26%
Context
202.8K
Route
baidu/fp8
Venice
Blended price
$2.64 / 1M
500-token response
14.61 s
Response starts
1.46 s
Output speed
38.0 tok/s
Route uptime
88.98%
Context
200K
Route
venice/fp8
GLM 5Winner · Baidu Qianfan

z-ai/glm-5

Baidu Qianfan
Blended price
$1.2133 / 1M
500-token response
13.46 s
Response starts
0.96 s
Output speed
40.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.35%
Context
202.8K
Route
baidu/fp8
Venice
Blended price
$1.7333 / 1M
500-token response
20.55 s
Response starts
1.32 s
Output speed
26.0 tok/s
Route uptime
N/a
Context
198K
Route
venice/fp8
DeepSeek V3.2Winner · Baidu Qianfan

deepseek/deepseek-v3.2

Baidu Qianfan
Blended price
$0.294 / 1M
500-token response
27.36 s
Response starts
1.04 s
Output speed
19.0 tok/s
Route uptime
100.00%
Context
131.1K
Route
baidu/fp8
Venice
Blended price
$0.38 / 1M
500-token response
84.24 s
Response starts
0.90 s
Output speed
6.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.40%
Context
160K
Route
venice

A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated . Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.

Baidu Qianfan vs Venice analysis

How Baidu Qianfan and Venice compare for AI inference

Baidu Qianfan and Venice share 7 indexed text models, including GLM 5.2, DeepSeek V4 Pro, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Kimi K2.6, GLM 5.1. Baidu Qianfan has the stronger typical response-time result on the directly measured set.

Same-model speed evidence

7 shared models currently have complete response-start and output-speed measurements on both providers. The speed comparison uses per-model ratios before taking the median, so naturally faster model catalogs do not improve the result.

Token pricing on one workload

7 shared models have complete input and output prices on both providers. Prices use the same 1,000-input/500-output-token mix and are normalized to one million tokens for readability.

Catalog and deployment differences

Baidu Qianfan has 7 indexed models and lists no published server regions; Venice has 29 models and lists 1 region. Verify data residency, privacy terms, limits, and production latency directly before choosing.