Skip to content
ProviderBench home

Same-model provider benchmark

Baseten vs DigitalOcean: LLM provider comparison

Compare Baseten and DigitalOcean on 5 exact shared text models. ProviderBench keeps speed, price, and catalog coverage separate so naturally faster model catalogs cannot distort the result.

Baseten

5 indexed models

Headquarters
United States
Server regions
N/a
Model types
5 text

DigitalOcean

16 indexed models

Headquarters
N/a
Server regions
N/a
Model types
16 text

At a glance

Metric winners

There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.

Fastest on shared models

Baseten

3.18× typical advantage

5 exact models with complete recent speed data

Lowest token cost

DigitalOcean

$1.5779 / 1M

5 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix

Most models available

DigitalOcean

16 models

Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities

Shared-model benchmark summary

MetricBasetenDigitalOcean
Typical 500-token response6.07 s25.10 s
Typical response start0.45 s1.11 s
Typical output speed89.0 tok/s23.0 tok/s
Blended token price$1.844 / 1M$1.5779 / 1M
Typical route uptime99.97%98.84%

Visual comparison

Price and performance charts

BasetenDigitalOcean
500-token response by shared model

Estimated seconds using recent median response-start and output-speed data. Lower is better.

Baseten has the lower typical same-model response ratio across 5 measured models.

Blended token price by shared model

USD per 1 million tokens using a 1,000-input/500-output mix. Lower is better.

DigitalOcean has the lower typical price ratio across 5 priced shared models.

Shared text models

5 exact models · newest first

ModelBasetenDigitalOcean
GLM 5.2Winner · Baseten

z-ai/glm-5.2

Baseten
Blended price
$2.4 / 1M
500-token response
5.86 s
Response starts
0.24 s
Output speed
89.0 tok/s
Route uptime
100.00%
Context
256K
Route
baseten/fp8
DigitalOcean
Blended price
$2.1667 / 1M
500-token response
12.22 s
Response starts
1.11 s
Output speed
45.0 tok/s
Route uptime
98.78%
Context
262.1K
Route
digitalocean
DeepSeek V4 ProWinner · Baseten

deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro

Baseten
Blended price
$2.32 / 1M
500-token response
6.07 s
Response starts
0.45 s
Output speed
89.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.97%
Context
262.1K
Route
baseten/fp4
DigitalOcean
Blended price
$1.856 / 1M
500-token response
33.90 s
Response starts
0.57 s
Output speed
15.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.92%
Context
262.1K
Route
digitalocean
Kimi K2.6Winner · DigitalOcean

moonshotai/kimi-k2.6

Baseten
Blended price
$1.9667 / 1M
500-token response
18.00 s
Response starts
3.51 s
Output speed
34.5 tok/s
Route uptime
N/a
Context
262K
Route
baseten/fp4
DigitalOcean
Blended price
$1.5733 / 1M
500-token response
13.08 s
Response starts
0.89 s
Output speed
41.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.04%
Context
262.1K
Route
digitalocean
GLM 5.1Winner · Baseten

z-ai/glm-5.1

Baseten
Blended price
$2.3 / 1M
500-token response
9.15 s
Response starts
2.74 s
Output speed
78.0 tok/s
Route uptime
96.53%
Context
202.8K
Route
baseten/fp4
DigitalOcean
Blended price
$2.0833 / 1M
500-token response
29.06 s
Response starts
1.28 s
Output speed
18.0 tok/s
Route uptime
57.53%
Context
163.8K
Route
digitalocean
gpt-oss-120bWinner · Baseten

openai/gpt-oss-120b

Baseten
Blended price
$0.2333 / 1M
500-token response
2.29 s
Response starts
0.26 s
Output speed
246.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.98%
Context
128.1K
Route
baseten/fp4
DigitalOcean
Blended price
$0.21 / 1M
500-token response
25.10 s
Response starts
3.36 s
Output speed
23.0 tok/s
Route uptime
98.90%
Context
128K
Route
digitalocean

A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated . Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.

Baseten vs DigitalOcean analysis

How Baseten and DigitalOcean compare for AI inference

Baseten and DigitalOcean share 5 indexed text models, including GLM 5.2, DeepSeek V4 Pro, Kimi K2.6, GLM 5.1, gpt-oss-120b. Baseten has the stronger typical response-time result on the directly measured set.

Same-model speed evidence

5 shared models currently have complete response-start and output-speed measurements on both providers. The speed comparison uses per-model ratios before taking the median, so naturally faster model catalogs do not improve the result.

Token pricing on one workload

5 shared models have complete input and output prices on both providers. Prices use the same 1,000-input/500-output-token mix and are normalized to one million tokens for readability.

Catalog and deployment differences

Baseten has 5 indexed models and lists no published server regions; DigitalOcean has 16 models and lists no regions. Verify data residency, privacy terms, limits, and production latency directly before choosing.

Related same-model benchmarks

Compare with other providers

Explore qualified alternatives with the most shared measured models. Recommendations include comparisons for both Baseten and DigitalOcean.

Baseten vs DeepInfra

5 shared model benchmarks

DigitalOcean vs NovitaAI

15 shared model benchmarks

Baseten vs Parasail

5 shared model benchmarks

DigitalOcean vs AtlasCloud

11 shared model benchmarks

Baseten vs SiliconFlow

5 shared model benchmarks

DigitalOcean vs Venice

11 shared model benchmarks