Skip to content

Same-model provider benchmark

Chutes vs DeepInfra: LLM provider comparison

Compare Chutes and DeepInfra on 8 exact shared text models. ProviderBench keeps speed, price, and catalog coverage separate so naturally faster model catalogs cannot distort the result.

Chutes

8 indexed models

Headquarters
United States
Server regions
N/a
Model types
8 text

DeepInfra

87 indexed models

Headquarters
United States
Server regions
N/a
Model types
67 text, 15 embeddings, 5 speech

At a glance

Metric winners

There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.

Fastest on shared models

1.59× typical advantage

8 exact models with complete recent speed data

Lowest token cost

$1.075 / 1M

8 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix

Most models available

87 models

Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities

Shared-model benchmark summary

MetricChutesDeepInfra
Typical 500-token response27.01 s17.68 s
Typical response start2.78 s0.93 s
Typical output speed25.0 tok/s30.5 tok/s
Blended token price$1.075 / 1M$1.1179 / 1M
Typical route uptime91.79%99.92%

Visual comparison

Price and performance charts

ChutesDeepInfra
500-token response by shared model

Estimated seconds using recent median response-start and output-speed data. Lower is better.

DeepInfra has the lower typical same-model response ratio across 8 measured models.

Blended token price by shared model

USD per 1 million tokens using a 1,000-input/500-output mix. Lower is better.

Chutes has the lower typical price ratio across 8 priced shared models.

Shared text models

8 exact models · newest first

ModelChutesDeepInfra
Qwen3.6 27BWinner · DeepInfra

qwen/qwen3.6-27b

Chutes
Blended price
$0.8667 / 1M
500-token response
46.78 s
Response starts
1.32 s
Output speed
11.0 tok/s
Route uptime
98.50%
Context
262.1K
Route
chutes/fp8
DeepInfra
Blended price
$1.28 / 1M
500-token response
27.04 s
Response starts
0.73 s
Output speed
19.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.57%
Context
262.1K
Route
deepinfra/fp8
Kimi K2.6Winner · DeepInfra

moonshotai/kimi-k2.6

Chutes
Blended price
$1.6067 / 1M
500-token response
31.19 s
Response starts
4.88 s
Output speed
19.0 tok/s
Route uptime
98.67%
Context
262.1K
Route
chutes/int4
DeepInfra
Blended price
$1.6667 / 1M
500-token response
12.84 s
Response starts
0.93 s
Output speed
42.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.94%
Context
262.1K
Route
deepinfra/fp4
GLM 5.1Winner · DeepInfra

z-ai/glm-5.1

Chutes
Blended price
$1.68 / 1M
500-token response
38.05 s
Response starts
18.05 s
Output speed
25.0 tok/s
Route uptime
63.57%
Context
202.8K
Route
chutes/fp8
DeepInfra
Blended price
$1.8667 / 1M
500-token response
18.81 s
Response starts
1.57 s
Output speed
29.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.92%
Context
202.8K
Route
deepinfra/fp4
Gemma 4 31BWinner · DeepInfra

google/gemma-4-31b-it

Chutes
Blended price
$0.2033 / 1M
500-token response
52.91 s
Response starts
2.91 s
Output speed
10.0 tok/s
Route uptime
57.68%
Context
131.1K
Route
chutes/fp4
DeepInfra
Blended price
$0.2033 / 1M
500-token response
22.57 s
Response starts
0.83 s
Output speed
23.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.06%
Context
262.1K
Route
deepinfra/turbo
Qwen3.5 397B A17BWinner · DeepInfra

qwen/qwen3.5-397b-a17b

Chutes
Blended price
$1.3 / 1M
500-token response
21.17 s
Response starts
2.65 s
Output speed
27.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.94%
Context
262.1K
Route
chutes/fp8
DeepInfra
Blended price
$1.3 / 1M
500-token response
14.53 s
Response starts
0.64 s
Output speed
36.0 tok/s
Route uptime
79.03%
Context
262.1K
Route
deepinfra/fp8
MiniMax M2.5Winner · DeepInfra

minimax/minimax-m2.5

Chutes
Blended price
$0.5 / 1M
500-token response
14.83 s
Response starts
1.68 s
Output speed
38.0 tok/s
Route uptime
83.43%
Context
196.6K
Route
chutes/fp8
DeepInfra
Blended price
$0.4833 / 1M
500-token response
11.21 s
Response starts
1.01 s
Output speed
49.0 tok/s
Route uptime
100.00%
Context
196.6K
Route
deepinfra/fp8
GLM 5Winner · DeepInfra

z-ai/glm-5

Chutes
Blended price
$1.4833 / 1M
500-token response
22.84 s
Response starts
4.32 s
Output speed
27.0 tok/s
Route uptime
N/a
Context
202.8K
Route
chutes/fp8
DeepInfra
Blended price
$1.0933 / 1M
500-token response
21.01 s
Response starts
1.01 s
Output speed
25.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.79%
Context
202.8K
Route
deepinfra/fp4
Kimi K2.5Winner · DeepInfra

moonshotai/kimi-k2.5

Chutes
Blended price
$0.96 / 1M
500-token response
21.33 s
Response starts
1.33 s
Output speed
25.0 tok/s
Route uptime
91.79%
Context
262.1K
Route
chutes/int4
DeepInfra
Blended price
$1.05 / 1M
500-token response
16.56 s
Response starts
0.93 s
Output speed
32.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.96%
Context
262.1K
Route
deepinfra/fp4

A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated . Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.

Chutes vs DeepInfra analysis

How Chutes and DeepInfra compare for AI inference

Chutes and DeepInfra share 8 indexed text models, including Qwen3.6 27B, Kimi K2.6, GLM 5.1, Gemma 4 31B, Qwen3.5 397B A17B. DeepInfra has the stronger typical response-time result on the directly measured set.

Same-model speed evidence

8 shared models currently have complete response-start and output-speed measurements on both providers. The speed comparison uses per-model ratios before taking the median, so naturally faster model catalogs do not improve the result.

Token pricing on one workload

8 shared models have complete input and output prices on both providers. Prices use the same 1,000-input/500-output-token mix and are normalized to one million tokens for readability.

Catalog and deployment differences

Chutes has 8 indexed models and lists no published server regions; DeepInfra has 87 models and lists no regions. Verify data residency, privacy terms, limits, and production latency directly before choosing.

Related same-model benchmarks

Compare with other providers

Explore qualified alternatives with the most shared measured models. Recommendations include comparisons for both Chutes and DeepInfra.