Chutes
8 indexed models
- Headquarters
United States
- Server regions
- N/a
- Model types
- 8 text
Start typing to search.
Same-model provider benchmark
Compare Chutes and Phala on 8 exact shared text models. ProviderBench keeps speed, price, and catalog coverage separate so naturally faster model catalogs cannot distort the result.
8 indexed models
18 indexed models
At a glance
There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.
| Metric | Chutes | Phala |
|---|---|---|
| Typical 500-token response | 27.01 s | 28.29 s |
| Typical response start | 2.78 s | 2.90 s |
| Typical output speed | 25.0 tok/s | 22.5 tok/s |
| Blended token price | $1.075 / 1M | $1.4158 / 1M |
| Typical route uptime | 95.15% | 94.63% |
Visual comparison
Estimated seconds using recent median response-start and output-speed data. Lower is better.
Chutes has the lower typical same-model response ratio across 8 measured models.
USD per 1 million tokens using a 1,000-input/500-output mix. Lower is better.
Chutes has the lower typical price ratio across 8 priced shared models.
| Model | Chutes | Phala |
|---|---|---|
Qwen3.6 27BWinner · Chutes qwen/qwen3.6-27b | Chutes
| Phala
|
Kimi K2.6Winner · Chutes moonshotai/kimi-k2.6 | Chutes
| Phala
|
GLM 5.1Winner · Chutes z-ai/glm-5.1 | Chutes
| Phala
|
Gemma 4 31BWinner · Chutes google/gemma-4-31b-it | Chutes
| Phala
|
Qwen3.5 397B A17BWinner · Chutes qwen/qwen3.5-397b-a17b | Chutes
| Phala
|
MiniMax M2.5Winner · Chutes minimax/minimax-m2.5 | Chutes
| Phala
|
GLM 5Winner · Chutes z-ai/glm-5 | Chutes
| Phala
|
Kimi K2.5Winner · Chutes moonshotai/kimi-k2.5 | Chutes
| Phala
|
A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated . Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.
Chutes vs Phala analysis
Chutes and Phala share 8 indexed text models, including Qwen3.6 27B, Kimi K2.6, GLM 5.1, Gemma 4 31B, Qwen3.5 397B A17B. Chutes has the stronger typical response-time result on the directly measured set.
8 shared models currently have complete response-start and output-speed measurements on both providers. The speed comparison uses per-model ratios before taking the median, so naturally faster model catalogs do not improve the result.
8 shared models have complete input and output prices on both providers. Prices use the same 1,000-input/500-output-token mix and are normalized to one million tokens for readability.
Chutes has 8 indexed models and lists no published server regions; Phala has 18 models and lists no regions. Verify data residency, privacy terms, limits, and production latency directly before choosing.
Related same-model benchmarks
Explore qualified alternatives with the most shared measured models. Recommendations include comparisons for both Chutes and Phala.