CoreWeave vs SiliconFlow: LLM provider comparison

At a glance

Metric winners

There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.

Fastest on shared models

CCoreWeave

2.80× typical advantage

15 exact models with complete recent speed data

Lowest token cost

SSiliconFlow

$0.9627 / 1M

15 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix

Most models available

SSiliconFlow

36 models

Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities

Shared-model benchmark summary

Metric	CCoreWeave☆☆☆☆☆(0)	SSiliconFlow☆☆☆☆☆(0)
Speed	CoreWeave7.35 s	SiliconFlow15.70 s
TTFT	CoreWeave0.36 s	SiliconFlow1.47 s
TPS	CoreWeave75.0 tok/s	SiliconFlow37.0 tok/s
Uptime	CoreWeave99.98%	SiliconFlow99.57%
Blended	CoreWeave$1.0673 / 1M	SiliconFlow$0.9627 / 1M

Model	CCoreWeave☆☆☆☆☆(0)	SSiliconFlow☆☆☆☆☆(0)
ZA GLM 5.2Winner · SiliconFlow	CoreWeave Speed— Worst comparable value 20.46 s TTFT— Best comparable value 1.94 s TPS— Worst comparable value 27.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 99.96% Context 262.1K Route coreweave/fp4 Blended— Worst comparable value $2.3933 / 1M	SiliconFlow Speed— Best comparable value 15.80 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 2.29 s TPS— Best comparable value 37.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 99.92% Context 1M Route siliconflow/fp8 Blended— Best comparable value $2.232 / 1M
M Kimi K2.7 CodeWinner · CoreWeave	CoreWeave Speed— Best comparable value 7.35 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.68 s TPS— Best comparable value 75.0 tok/s Uptime 100.00% Context 262.1K Route coreweave/int4 Blended— Worst comparable value $1.96 / 1M	SiliconFlow Speed— Worst comparable value 13.47 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 1.27 s TPS— Worst comparable value 41.0 tok/s Uptime 100.00% Context 262.1K Route siliconflow/fp8 Blended— Best comparable value $1.8394 / 1M
Q Qwen3.6 35B A3BWinner · CoreWeave	CoreWeave Speed— Best comparable value 3.72 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.26 s TPS— Best comparable value 144.5 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 100.00% Context 262.1K Route coreweave/fp8 Blended— Best comparable value $0.5833 / 1M	SiliconFlow Speed— Worst comparable value 11.90 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 1.26 s TPS— Worst comparable value 47.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 99.75% Context 262.1K Route siliconflow/fp8 Blended— Worst comparable value $0.6667 / 1M
Q Qwen3.6 27BWinner · CoreWeave	CoreWeave Speed— Best comparable value 18.18 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.33 s TPS— Best comparable value 28.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 100.00% Context 262.1K Route coreweave/fp8 Blended— Worst comparable value $1.6 / 1M	SiliconFlow Speed— Worst comparable value 25.28 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 1.47 s TPS— Worst comparable value 21.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 97.38% Context 262.1K Route siliconflow/fp8 Blended— Best comparable value $1.2667 / 1M
D DeepSeek V4 ProWinner · SiliconFlow	CoreWeave Speed— Worst comparable value 64.00 s TTFT— Best comparable value 1.50 s TPS— Worst comparable value 8.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 98.59% Context 1M Route coreweave/fp8 Blended— Worst comparable value $2.32 / 1M	SiliconFlow Speed— Best comparable value 12.91 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 2.04 s TPS— Best comparable value 46.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 99.63% Context 1M Route siliconflow/fp8 Blended— Best comparable value $2.0461 / 1M
D DeepSeek V4 FlashWinner · SiliconFlow	CoreWeave Speed— Worst comparable value 17.27 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.60 s TPS— Worst comparable value 30.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 99.85% Context 1M Route coreweave/fp8 Blended— Worst comparable value $0.1867 / 1M	SiliconFlow Speed— Best comparable value 10.07 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 1.73 s TPS— Best comparable value 60.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 97.71% Context 1M Route siliconflow/fp8 Blended— Best comparable value $0.18 / 1M
M Kimi K2.6Winner · CoreWeave	CoreWeave Speed— Best comparable value 3.30 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.34 s TPS— Best comparable value 169.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 99.89% Context 262.1K Route coreweave/fp4 Blended— Worst comparable value $1.9667 / 1M	SiliconFlow Speed— Worst comparable value 15.70 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 1.81 s TPS— Worst comparable value 36.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 100.00% Context 262.1K Route siliconflow/fp8 Blended— Best comparable value $1.6467 / 1M
ZA GLM 5.1Winner · CoreWeave	CoreWeave Speed— Best comparable value 4.38 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.50 s TPS— Best comparable value 129.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 100.00% Context 202.8K Route coreweave/fp8 Blended— Worst comparable value $2.4 / 1M	SiliconFlow Speed— Worst comparable value 10.65 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 1.22 s TPS— Worst comparable value 53.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 99.79% Context 204.8K Route siliconflow/fp8 Blended— Best comparable value $2.04 / 1M
G Gemma 4 31BWinner · CoreWeave	CoreWeave Speed— Best comparable value 30.82 s TTFT— Best comparable value 1.41 s TPS— Best comparable value 17.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 77.67% Context 262.1K Route coreweave/bf16 Blended— Best comparable value $0.1967 / 1M	SiliconFlow Speed— Worst comparable value 127.75 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 2.75 s TPS— Worst comparable value 4.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 22.68% Context 262.1K Route siliconflow/fp8 Blended— Worst comparable value $0.22 / 1M
Q Qwen3.5-35B-A3BWinner · CoreWeave	CoreWeave Speed— Best comparable value 4.86 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.35 s TPS— Best comparable value 111.0 tok/s Uptime 100.00% Context 262.1K Route coreweave/fp8 Blended— Best comparable value $0.5833 / 1M	SiliconFlow Speed— Worst comparable value 17.83 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 1.70 s TPS— Worst comparable value 31.0 tok/s Uptime N/a Context 262.1K Route siliconflow/fp8 Blended— Worst comparable value $0.76 / 1M
M MiniMax M2.5Winner · CoreWeave	CoreWeave Speed— Best comparable value 6.55 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.38 s TPS— Best comparable value 81.0 tok/s Uptime 100.00% Context 196.6K Route coreweave/fp8 Blended $0.6 / 1M	SiliconFlow Speed— Worst comparable value 11.37 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 1.16 s TPS— Worst comparable value 49.0 tok/s Uptime 100.00% Context 196.6K Route siliconflow/fp8 Blended $0.6 / 1M
D DeepSeek V3.1Winner · CoreWeave	CoreWeave Speed— Best comparable value 9.97 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.35 s TPS— Best comparable value 52.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 100.00% Context 161K Route coreweave/fp8 Blended— Worst comparable value $0.9167 / 1M	SiliconFlow Speed— Worst comparable value 37.17 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 1.45 s TPS— Worst comparable value 14.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 96.14% Context 163.8K Route siliconflow/fp8 Blended— Best comparable value $0.5133 / 1M
O gpt-oss-120bWinner · CoreWeave	CoreWeave Speed— Best comparable value 5.92 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.36 s TPS— Best comparable value 90.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 99.68% Context 131.1K Route coreweave/fp4 Blended— Best comparable value $0.0733 / 1M	SiliconFlow Speed— Worst comparable value 17.97 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 1.31 s TPS— Worst comparable value 30.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 96.83% Context 131.1K Route siliconflow/fp8 Blended— Worst comparable value $0.1833 / 1M
O gpt-oss-20bWinner · CoreWeave	CoreWeave Speed— Best comparable value 4.18 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.28 s TPS— Best comparable value 128.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 87.61% Context 131.1K Route coreweave/fp4 Blended— Best comparable value $0.0633 / 1M	SiliconFlow Speed— Worst comparable value 13.08 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 1.17 s TPS— Worst comparable value 42.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 90.57% Context 131.1K Route siliconflow/fp8 Blended— Worst comparable value $0.0867 / 1M
Q Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Winner · CoreWeave	CoreWeave Speed— Best comparable value 8.22 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.28 s TPS— Best comparable value 63.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 100.00% Context 262.1K Route coreweave/bf16 Blended— Worst comparable value $0.1667 / 1M	SiliconFlow Speed— Worst comparable value 22.99 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 2.16 s TPS— Worst comparable value 24.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 99.50% Context 262.1K Route siliconflow/fp8 Blended— Best comparable value $0.16 / 1M

A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated Jul 24, 2026, 6:19 PM UTC. Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.