Skip to content

Same-model provider benchmark

DeepInfra vs Nebius: LLM provider comparison

Compare DeepInfra and Nebius on 8 exact shared text models. ProviderBench keeps speed, price, and catalog coverage separate so naturally faster model catalogs cannot distort the result.

DeepInfra

87 indexed models

Headquarters
United States
Server regions
N/a
Model types
67 text, 15 embeddings, 5 speech

Nebius

13 indexed models

Headquarters
Netherlands
Server regions
N/a
Model types
12 text, 1 embeddings

At a glance

Metric winners

There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.

Fastest on shared models

1.27× typical advantage

8 exact models with complete recent speed data

Lowest token cost

$0.3635 / 1M

8 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix

Most models available

87 models

Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities

Shared-model benchmark summary

MetricDeepInfraNebius
Typical 500-token response22.76 s17.17 s
Typical response start0.57 s0.66 s
Typical output speed24.0 tok/s31.5 tok/s
Blended token price$0.3635 / 1M$0.5258 / 1M
Typical route uptime99.00%97.63%

Visual comparison

Price and performance charts

DeepInfraNebius
500-token response by shared model

Estimated seconds using recent median response-start and output-speed data. Lower is better.

Nebius has the lower typical same-model response ratio across 8 measured models.

Blended token price by shared model

USD per 1 million tokens using a 1,000-input/500-output mix. Lower is better.

DeepInfra has the lower typical price ratio across 8 priced shared models.

Shared text models

8 exact models · newest first

ModelDeepInfraNebius
GLM 5.1Winner · DeepInfra

z-ai/glm-5.1

DeepInfra
Blended price
$1.8667 / 1M
500-token response
18.81 s
Response starts
1.57 s
Output speed
29.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.92%
Context
202.8K
Route
deepinfra/fp4
Nebius
Blended price
$2.4 / 1M
500-token response
28.52 s
Response starts
0.74 s
Output speed
18.0 tok/s
Route uptime
67.68%
Context
202.8K
Route
nebius/fp8
Nemotron 3 SuperWinner · Nebius

nvidia/nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b

DeepInfra
Blended price
$0.19 / 1M
500-token response
41.88 s
Response starts
6.16 s
Output speed
14.0 tok/s
Route uptime
90.39%
Context
262.1K
Route
deepinfra/bf16
Nebius
Blended price
$0.5 / 1M
500-token response
7.85 s
Response starts
1.67 s
Output speed
81.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.41%
Context
262.1K
Route
nebius/fp4
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BWinner · DeepInfra

nvidia/nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b

DeepInfra
Blended price
$0.1 / 1M
500-token response
8.83 s
Response starts
1.25 s
Output speed
66.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.22%
Context
262.1K
Route
deepinfra/fp4
Nebius
Blended price
$0.12 / 1M
500-token response
12.83 s
Response starts
0.33 s
Output speed
40.0 tok/s
Route uptime
96.57%
Context
262.1K
Route
nebius/fp8
gpt-oss-120bWinner · DeepInfra

openai/gpt-oss-120b

DeepInfra
Blended price
$0.0813 / 1M
500-token response
12.10 s
Response starts
0.47 s
Output speed
43.0 tok/s
Route uptime
94.64%
Context
131.1K
Route
deepinfra/bf16
Nebius
Blended price
$0.3 / 1M
500-token response
6.62 s
Response starts
0.67 s
Output speed
84.0 tok/s
Route uptime
97.33%
Context
131.1K
Route
nebius/fp4

qwen/qwen3-235b-a22b-2507

DeepInfra
Blended price
$0.2433 / 1M
500-token response
26.72 s
Response starts
0.40 s
Output speed
19.0 tok/s
Route uptime
98.78%
Context
262.1K
Route
deepinfra/fp8
Nebius
Blended price
$0.3333 / 1M
500-token response
13.68 s
Response starts
0.52 s
Output speed
38.0 tok/s
Route uptime
98.77%
Context
262.1K
Route
nebius/fp8
Qwen3 32BWinner · DeepInfra

qwen/qwen3-32b

DeepInfra
Blended price
$0.1467 / 1M
500-token response
15.38 s
Response starts
0.23 s
Output speed
33.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.99%
Context
41K
Route
deepinfra/fp8
Nebius
Blended price
$0.1667 / 1M
500-token response
20.66 s
Response starts
0.66 s
Output speed
25.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.27%
Context
41K
Route
nebius/base
Gemma 3 27BWinner · DeepInfra

google/gemma-3-27b-it

DeepInfra
Blended price
$0.1067 / 1M
500-token response
30.09 s
Response starts
0.68 s
Output speed
17.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.95%
Context
131.1K
Route
deepinfra/fp8
Nebius
Blended price
$0.1667 / 1M
500-token response
28.44 s
Response starts
0.66 s
Output speed
18.0 tok/s
Route uptime
93.99%
Context
110K
Route
nebius/fp8
Llama 3.3 70B InstructWinner · Nebius

meta-llama/llama-3.3-70b-instruct

DeepInfra
Blended price
$0.1733 / 1M
500-token response
31.59 s
Response starts
0.34 s
Output speed
16.0 tok/s
Route uptime
98.39%
Context
131.1K
Route
deepinfra/turbo
Nebius
Blended price
$0.22 / 1M
500-token response
21.28 s
Response starts
0.45 s
Output speed
24.0 tok/s
Route uptime
97.93%
Context
131.1K
Route
nebius/fp8

A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated . Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.

DeepInfra vs Nebius analysis

How DeepInfra and Nebius compare for AI inference

DeepInfra and Nebius share 8 indexed text models, including GLM 5.1, Nemotron 3 Super, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, gpt-oss-120b, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507. Nebius has the stronger typical response-time result on the directly measured set.

Same-model speed evidence

8 shared models currently have complete response-start and output-speed measurements on both providers. The speed comparison uses per-model ratios before taking the median, so naturally faster model catalogs do not improve the result.

Token pricing on one workload

8 shared models have complete input and output prices on both providers. Prices use the same 1,000-input/500-output-token mix and are normalized to one million tokens for readability.

Catalog and deployment differences

DeepInfra has 87 indexed models and lists no published server regions; Nebius has 13 models and lists no regions. Verify data residency, privacy terms, limits, and production latency directly before choosing.