Skip to content

Same-model provider benchmark

Nebius vs Parasail: LLM provider comparison

Compare Nebius and Parasail on 6 exact shared text models. ProviderBench keeps speed, price, and catalog coverage separate so naturally faster model catalogs cannot distort the result.

Nebius

13 indexed models

Headquarters
Netherlands
Server regions
N/a
Model types
12 text, 1 embeddings

Parasail

35 indexed models

Headquarters
United States
Server regions
N/a
Model types
34 text, 1 embeddings

At a glance

Metric winners

There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.

Fastest on shared models

1.38× typical advantage

6 exact models with complete recent speed data

Lowest token cost

$0.6394 / 1M

6 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix

Most models available

35 models

Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities

Shared-model benchmark summary

MetricNebiusParasail
Typical 500-token response24.86 s13.57 s
Typical response start0.67 s0.55 s
Typical output speed21.0 tok/s39.5 tok/s
Blended token price$0.6394 / 1M$0.7433 / 1M
Typical route uptime96.55%99.73%

Visual comparison

Price and performance charts

NebiusParasail
500-token response by shared model

Estimated seconds using recent median response-start and output-speed data. Lower is better.

Parasail has the lower typical same-model response ratio across 6 measured models.

Blended token price by shared model

USD per 1 million tokens using a 1,000-input/500-output mix. Lower is better.

Nebius has the lower typical price ratio across 6 priced shared models.

Shared text models

6 exact models · newest first

ModelNebiusParasail
GLM 5.1Winner · Parasail

z-ai/glm-5.1

Nebius
Blended price
$2.4 / 1M
500-token response
28.52 s
Response starts
0.74 s
Output speed
18.0 tok/s
Route uptime
67.68%
Context
202.8K
Route
nebius/fp8
Parasail
Blended price
$2.4 / 1M
500-token response
8.43 s
Response starts
2.18 s
Output speed
80.0 tok/s
Route uptime
85.33%
Context
202.8K
Route
parasail/fp8
gpt-oss-120bWinner · Nebius

openai/gpt-oss-120b

Nebius
Blended price
$0.3 / 1M
500-token response
6.62 s
Response starts
0.67 s
Output speed
84.0 tok/s
Route uptime
97.33%
Context
131.1K
Route
nebius/fp4
Parasail
Blended price
$0.3167 / 1M
500-token response
9.13 s
Response starts
0.51 s
Output speed
58.0 tok/s
Route uptime
92.57%
Context
131.1K
Route
parasail/fp4

qwen/qwen3-235b-a22b-2507

Nebius
Blended price
$0.3333 / 1M
500-token response
13.68 s
Response starts
0.52 s
Output speed
38.0 tok/s
Route uptime
98.77%
Context
262.1K
Route
nebius/fp8
Parasail
Blended price
$0.36 / 1M
500-token response
16.05 s
Response starts
0.42 s
Output speed
32.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.90%
Context
131.1K
Route
parasail/fp8
Gemma 3 27BWinner · Parasail

google/gemma-3-27b-it

Nebius
Blended price
$0.1667 / 1M
500-token response
28.44 s
Response starts
0.66 s
Output speed
18.0 tok/s
Route uptime
93.99%
Context
110K
Route
nebius/fp8
Parasail
Blended price
$0.2033 / 1M
500-token response
16.21 s
Response starts
0.58 s
Output speed
32.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.99%
Context
131.1K
Route
parasail/fp8
Qwen2.5 VL 72B InstructWinner · Nebius

qwen/qwen2.5-vl-72b-instruct

Nebius
Blended price
$0.4167 / 1M
500-token response
250.84 s
Response starts
0.84 s
Output speed
2.0 tok/s
Route uptime
95.77%
Context
32K
Route
nebius/fp8
Parasail
Blended price
$0.8667 / 1M
500-token response
250.88 s
Response starts
0.88 s
Output speed
2.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.98%
Context
128K
Route
parasail/fp8
Llama 3.3 70B InstructWinner · Parasail

meta-llama/llama-3.3-70b-instruct

Nebius
Blended price
$0.22 / 1M
500-token response
21.28 s
Response starts
0.45 s
Output speed
24.0 tok/s
Route uptime
97.93%
Context
131.1K
Route
nebius/fp8
Parasail
Blended price
$0.3133 / 1M
500-token response
11.10 s
Response starts
0.46 s
Output speed
47.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.56%
Context
131.1K
Route
parasail/fp8

A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated . Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.

Nebius vs Parasail analysis

How Nebius and Parasail compare for AI inference

Nebius and Parasail share 6 indexed text models, including GLM 5.1, gpt-oss-120b, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507, Gemma 3 27B, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct. Parasail has the stronger typical response-time result on the directly measured set.

Same-model speed evidence

6 shared models currently have complete response-start and output-speed measurements on both providers. The speed comparison uses per-model ratios before taking the median, so naturally faster model catalogs do not improve the result.

Token pricing on one workload

6 shared models have complete input and output prices on both providers. Prices use the same 1,000-input/500-output-token mix and are normalized to one million tokens for readability.

Catalog and deployment differences

Nebius has 13 indexed models and lists no published server regions; Parasail has 35 models and lists no regions. Verify data residency, privacy terms, limits, and production latency directly before choosing.

Related same-model benchmarks

Compare with other providers

Explore qualified alternatives with the most shared measured models. Recommendations include comparisons for both Nebius and Parasail.