Nebius
13 indexed models
- Headquarters
Netherlands
- Server regions
- N/a
- Model types
- 12 text, 1 embeddings
Start typing to search.
Same-model provider benchmark
Compare Nebius and Parasail on 6 exact shared text models. ProviderBench keeps speed, price, and catalog coverage separate so naturally faster model catalogs cannot distort the result.
13 indexed models
35 indexed models
At a glance
There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.
| Metric | Nebius | Parasail |
|---|---|---|
| Typical 500-token response | 24.86 s | 13.57 s |
| Typical response start | 0.67 s | 0.55 s |
| Typical output speed | 21.0 tok/s | 39.5 tok/s |
| Blended token price | $0.6394 / 1M | $0.7433 / 1M |
| Typical route uptime | 96.55% | 99.73% |
Visual comparison
Estimated seconds using recent median response-start and output-speed data. Lower is better.
Parasail has the lower typical same-model response ratio across 6 measured models.
USD per 1 million tokens using a 1,000-input/500-output mix. Lower is better.
Nebius has the lower typical price ratio across 6 priced shared models.
| Model | Nebius | Parasail |
|---|---|---|
GLM 5.1Winner · Parasail z-ai/glm-5.1 | Nebius
| Parasail
|
gpt-oss-120bWinner · Nebius openai/gpt-oss-120b | Nebius
| Parasail
|
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Winner · Nebius qwen/qwen3-235b-a22b-2507 | Nebius
| Parasail
|
Gemma 3 27BWinner · Parasail google/gemma-3-27b-it | Nebius
| Parasail
|
Qwen2.5 VL 72B InstructWinner · Nebius qwen/qwen2.5-vl-72b-instruct | Nebius
| Parasail
|
Llama 3.3 70B InstructWinner · Parasail meta-llama/llama-3.3-70b-instruct | Nebius
| Parasail
|
A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated . Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.
Nebius vs Parasail analysis
Nebius and Parasail share 6 indexed text models, including GLM 5.1, gpt-oss-120b, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507, Gemma 3 27B, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct. Parasail has the stronger typical response-time result on the directly measured set.
6 shared models currently have complete response-start and output-speed measurements on both providers. The speed comparison uses per-model ratios before taking the median, so naturally faster model catalogs do not improve the result.
6 shared models have complete input and output prices on both providers. Prices use the same 1,000-input/500-output-token mix and are normalized to one million tokens for readability.
Nebius has 13 indexed models and lists no published server regions; Parasail has 35 models and lists no regions. Verify data residency, privacy terms, limits, and production latency directly before choosing.
Related same-model benchmarks
Explore qualified alternatives with the most shared measured models. Recommendations include comparisons for both Nebius and Parasail.