Skip to content

Same-model provider benchmark

DeepInfra vs NextBit: LLM provider comparison

Compare DeepInfra and NextBit on 6 exact shared text models. ProviderBench keeps speed, price, and catalog coverage separate so naturally faster model catalogs cannot distort the result.

DeepInfra

87 indexed models

Headquarters
United States
Server regions
N/a
Model types
67 text, 15 embeddings, 5 speech

NextBit

13 indexed models

Headquarters
Spain
Server regions
Spain
Model types
13 text

At a glance

Metric winners

There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.

Fastest on shared models

2.27× typical advantage

6 exact models with complete recent speed data

Lowest token cost

$0.2522 / 1M

6 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix

Most models available

87 models

Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities

Shared-model benchmark summary

MetricDeepInfraNextBit
Typical 500-token response11.24 s22.93 s
Typical response start0.37 s1.57 s
Typical output speed45.5 tok/s24.5 tok/s
Blended token price$0.2522 / 1M$0.2672 / 1M
Typical route uptime99.66%99.39%

Visual comparison

Price and performance charts

DeepInfraNextBit
500-token response by shared model

Estimated seconds using recent median response-start and output-speed data. Lower is better.

DeepInfra has the lower typical same-model response ratio across 6 measured models.

Blended token price by shared model

USD per 1 million tokens using a 1,000-input/500-output mix. Lower is better.

DeepInfra has the lower typical price ratio across 6 priced shared models.

Shared text models

6 exact models · newest first

ModelDeepInfraNextBit
DeepSeek V4 FlashWinner · DeepInfra

deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

DeepInfra
Blended price
$0.12 / 1M
500-token response
20.36 s
Response starts
1.13 s
Output speed
26.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.43%
Context
1M
Route
deepinfra/fp4
NextBit
Blended price
$0.2367 / 1M
500-token response
32.88 s
Response starts
1.63 s
Output speed
16.0 tok/s
Route uptime
94.46%
Context
1M
Route
nextbit/fp8
Gemma 4 26B A4BWinner · DeepInfra

google/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it

DeepInfra
Blended price
$0.16 / 1M
500-token response
22.23 s
Response starts
0.49 s
Output speed
23.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.62%
Context
262.1K
Route
deepinfra/fp8
NextBit
Blended price
$0.1967 / 1M
500-token response
75.94 s
Response starts
4.51 s
Output speed
7.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.38%
Context
262.1K
Route
nextbit/bf16
Qwen3.5-35B-A3BWinner · DeepInfra

qwen/qwen3.5-35b-a3b

DeepInfra
Blended price
$0.4267 / 1M
500-token response
5.89 s
Response starts
0.28 s
Output speed
89.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.69%
Context
262.1K
Route
deepinfra/fp8
NextBit
Blended price
$0.6867 / 1M
500-token response
18.04 s
Response starts
1.91 s
Output speed
31.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.41%
Context
262.1K
Route
nextbit/fp8
Qwen3 30B A3BWinner · DeepInfra

qwen/qwen3-30b-a3b

DeepInfra
Blended price
$0.2467 / 1M
500-token response
10.86 s
Response starts
0.22 s
Output speed
47.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.63%
Context
41K
Route
deepinfra/fp8
NextBit
Blended price
$0.2767 / 1M
500-token response
27.82 s
Response starts
1.51 s
Output speed
19.0 tok/s
Route uptime
83.56%
Context
32.8K
Route
nextbit/fp8
Qwen3 14BWinner · DeepInfra

qwen/qwen3-14b

DeepInfra
Blended price
$0.16 / 1M
500-token response
8.66 s
Response starts
0.46 s
Output speed
61.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.75%
Context
41K
Route
deepinfra/fp8
NextBit
Blended price
$0.1467 / 1M
500-token response
17.70 s
Response starts
1.03 s
Output speed
30.0 tok/s
Route uptime
100.00%
Context
41K
Route
nextbit/int4
MythoMax 13BWinner · NextBit

gryphe/mythomax-l2-13b

DeepInfra
Blended price
$0.4 / 1M
500-token response
11.62 s
Response starts
0.26 s
Output speed
44.0 tok/s
Route uptime
99.74%
Context
4.1K
Route
deepinfra/fp16
NextBit
Blended price
$0.06 / 1M
500-token response
15.21 s
Response starts
0.92 s
Output speed
35.0 tok/s
Route uptime
100.00%
Context
4.1K
Route
nextbit/int4

A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated . Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.

DeepInfra vs NextBit analysis

How DeepInfra and NextBit compare for AI inference

DeepInfra and NextBit share 6 indexed text models, including DeepSeek V4 Flash, Gemma 4 26B A4B, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B, Qwen3 30B A3B, Qwen3 14B. DeepInfra has the stronger typical response-time result on the directly measured set.

Same-model speed evidence

6 shared models currently have complete response-start and output-speed measurements on both providers. The speed comparison uses per-model ratios before taking the median, so naturally faster model catalogs do not improve the result.

Token pricing on one workload

6 shared models have complete input and output prices on both providers. Prices use the same 1,000-input/500-output-token mix and are normalized to one million tokens for readability.

Catalog and deployment differences

DeepInfra has 87 indexed models and lists no published server regions; NextBit has 13 models and lists 1 region. Verify data residency, privacy terms, limits, and production latency directly before choosing.