DekaLLM vs Venice: LLM provider comparison

At a glance

Metric winners

There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.

Fastest on shared models

VVenice

1.24× typical advantage

3 exact models with complete recent speed data

Lowest token cost

DDekaLLM

$0.5207 / 1M

3 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix

Most models available

VVenice

30 models

Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities

Shared-model benchmark summary

Metric	DDekaLLM☆☆☆☆☆(0)	VVenice☆☆☆☆☆(0)
Speed	DekaLLM12.53 s	Venice9.77 s
TTFT	DekaLLM1.06 s	Venice0.68 s
TPS	DekaLLM44.0 tok/s	Venice55.0 tok/s
Uptime	DekaLLM95.49%	Venice99.71%
Blended	DekaLLM$0.5207 / 1M	Venice$0.6511 / 1M

Model	DDekaLLM☆☆☆☆☆(0)	VVenice☆☆☆☆☆(0)
Q Qwen3.6 35B A3BWinner · Venice	DekaLLM Speed— Worst comparable value 3.62 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 0.62 s TPS— Worst comparable value 167.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 96.07% Context 262.1K Route dekallm Blended— Best comparable value $0.42 / 1M	Venice Speed— Best comparable value 2.91 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.57 s TPS— Best comparable value 214.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 100.00% Context 256K Route venice/fp8 Blended— Worst comparable value $0.4333 / 1M
Q Qwen3.6 27BWinner · Venice	DekaLLM Speed— Worst comparable value 42.73 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 1.06 s TPS— Worst comparable value 12.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 90.82% Context 262.1K Route dekallm Blended— Best comparable value $0.992 / 1M	Venice Speed— Best comparable value 9.77 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.68 s TPS— Best comparable value 55.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 99.71% Context 256K Route venice/fp8 Blended— Worst comparable value $1.3 / 1M
G Gemma 4 26B A4BWinner · DekaLLM	DekaLLM Speed— Best comparable value 12.53 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 1.16 s TPS— Best comparable value 44.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 95.49% Context 262.1K Route dekallm/bf16 Blended— Best comparable value $0.15 / 1M	Venice Speed— Worst comparable value 13.43 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.93 s TPS— Worst comparable value 40.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 99.36% Context 256K Route venice/bf16 Blended— Worst comparable value $0.22 / 1M

A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated Jul 24, 2026, 6:20 PM UTC. Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.