Skip to content
ProviderBench home

Same-model provider benchmark

io.net vs Parasail: LLM provider comparison

Compare io.net and Parasail on 3 exact shared text models. ProviderBench keeps speed, price, and catalog coverage separate so naturally faster model catalogs cannot distort the result.

io.net

4 indexed models

Headquarters
United States
Server regions
N/a
Model types
4 text

Parasail

36 indexed models

Headquarters
United States
Server regions
N/a
Model types
35 text, 1 embeddings

At a glance

Metric winners

There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.

Fastest on shared models

Parasail

2.68× typical advantage

3 exact models with complete recent speed data

Lowest token cost

Parasail

$1.0067 / 1M

3 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix

Most models available

Parasail

36 models

Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities

Shared-model benchmark summary

Metricio.net(0)Parasail(0)
Speedio.net12.09 sParasail10.46 s
TTFTio.net1.87 sParasail0.63 s
TPSio.net44.0 tok/sParasail50.0 tok/s
Uptimeio.net99.88%Parasail99.89%
Blendedio.net$1.6407 / 1MParasail$1.0067 / 1M
Green value Better comparable resultRed value Worse comparable result

Visual comparison

Price and performance charts

io.netParasail
500-token response by shared model

Estimated seconds using recent median response-start and output-speed data. Lower is better.

Parasail has the lower typical same-model response ratio across 3 measured models.

Blended token price by shared model

USD per 1 million tokens using a 1,000-input/500-output mix. Lower is better.

Parasail has the lower typical price ratio across 3 priced shared models.

Shared text models

3 exact models · newest first

Modelio.net(0)Parasail(0)
GLM 5.2Winner · Parasail
io.net
Speed— Worst comparable value
11.13 s
TTFT— Worst comparable value
1.87 s
TPS— Worst comparable value
54.0 tok/s
Uptime— Best comparable value
100.00%
Context
262.1K
Route
io-net/fp8
Blended— Worst comparable value
$3.9565 / 1M
Parasail
Speed— Best comparable value
4.15 s
TTFT— Best comparable value
0.63 s
TPS— Best comparable value
142.0 tok/s
Uptime— Worst comparable value
99.93%
Context
262.1K
Route
parasail/fp4
Blended— Best comparable value
$2.4 / 1M
Qwen3.6 35B A3BWinner · Parasail
io.net
Speed— Worst comparable value
12.09 s
TTFT— Worst comparable value
0.72 s
TPS— Worst comparable value
44.0 tok/s
Uptime— Worst comparable value
75.84%
Context
262.1K
Route
io-net/fp8
Blended— Worst comparable value
$0.68 / 1M
Parasail
Speed— Best comparable value
10.46 s
TTFT— Best comparable value
0.46 s
TPS— Best comparable value
50.0 tok/s
Uptime— Best comparable value
99.89%
Context
262.1K
Route
parasail/fp8
Blended— Best comparable value
$0.4333 / 1M
DeepSeek V4 FlashWinner · Parasail
io.net
Speed— Worst comparable value
170.56 s
TTFT— Worst comparable value
3.89 s
TPS— Worst comparable value
3.0 tok/s
Uptime— Best comparable value
99.88%
Context
32.8K
Route
io-net/fp8
Blended— Worst comparable value
$0.2857 / 1M
Parasail
Speed— Best comparable value
12.57 s
TTFT— Best comparable value
0.67 s
TPS— Best comparable value
42.0 tok/s
Uptime— Worst comparable value
96.19%
Context
1M
Route
parasail/fp8
Blended— Best comparable value
$0.1867 / 1M

A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated . Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.

io.net vs Parasail analysis

How io.net and Parasail compare for AI inference

io.net and Parasail share 3 indexed text models, including GLM 5.2, Qwen3.6 35B A3B, DeepSeek V4 Flash. Parasail has the stronger typical response-time result on the directly measured set.

Same-model speed evidence

3 shared models currently have complete response-start and output-speed measurements on both providers. The speed comparison uses per-model ratios before taking the median, so naturally faster model catalogs do not improve the result.

Token pricing on one workload

3 shared models have complete input and output prices on both providers. Prices use the same 1,000-input/500-output-token mix and are normalized to one million tokens for readability.

Catalog and deployment differences

io.net has 4 indexed models and lists no published server regions; Parasail has 36 models and lists no regions. Verify data residency, privacy terms, limits, and production latency directly before choosing.

Related same-model benchmarks

Compare with other providers

Explore qualified alternatives with the most shared measured models. Recommendations include comparisons for both io.net and Parasail.

io.net vs SiliconFlow

4 shared model benchmarks

Parasail vs DeepInfra

19 shared model benchmarks

io.net vs Weights & Biases

4 shared model benchmarks

Parasail vs NovitaAI

17 shared model benchmarks

io.net vs AkashML

3 shared model benchmarks

Parasail vs Venice

15 shared model benchmarks