Skip to content

Same-model provider benchmark

Ionstream vs SiliconFlow: LLM provider comparison

Compare Ionstream and SiliconFlow on 4 exact shared text models. ProviderBench keeps speed, price, and catalog coverage separate so naturally faster model catalogs cannot distort the result.

Ionstream

5 indexed models

Headquarters
United States
Server regions
United States
Model types
5 text

SiliconFlow

36 indexed models

Headquarters
Singapore
Server regions
United States
Model types
35 text, 1 embeddings

At a glance

Metric winners

There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.

Fastest on shared models

2.44× typical advantage

4 exact models with complete recent speed data

Lowest token cost

$1.0787 / 1M

4 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix

Most models available

36 models

Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities

Shared-model benchmark summary

MetricIonstream(0)SiliconFlow(0)
SpeedIonstream38.77 sSiliconFlow14.36 s
TTFTIonstream1.53 sSiliconFlow1.89 s
TPSIonstream13.5 tok/sSiliconFlow41.5 tok/s
UptimeIonstream91.56%SiliconFlow99.15%
BlendedIonstream$1.0787 / 1MSiliconFlow$1.1679 / 1M
Green value Better comparable resultRed value Worse comparable result

Visual comparison

Price and performance charts

IonstreamSiliconFlow
500-token response by shared model

Estimated seconds using recent median response-start and output-speed data. Lower is better.

SiliconFlow has the lower typical same-model response ratio across 4 measured models.

Blended token price by shared model

USD per 1 million tokens using a 1,000-input/500-output mix. Lower is better.

Ionstream has the lower typical price ratio across 4 priced shared models.

Shared text models

4 exact models · newest first

ModelIonstream(0)SiliconFlow(0)
GLM 5.2Winner · Ionstream
Ionstream
Speed— Best comparable value
12.96 s
TTFT— Best comparable value
1.33 s
TPS— Best comparable value
43.0 tok/s
Uptime
N/a
Context
1M
Route
ionstream/fp4
Blended— Worst comparable value
$2.4 / 1M
SiliconFlow
Speed— Worst comparable value
15.80 s
TTFT— Worst comparable value
2.29 s
TPS— Worst comparable value
37.0 tok/s
Uptime
99.92%
Context
1M
Route
siliconflow/fp8
Blended— Best comparable value
$2.232 / 1M
DeepSeek V4 ProWinner · SiliconFlow
Ionstream
Speed— Worst comparable value
43.38 s
TTFT— Best comparable value
1.72 s
TPS— Worst comparable value
12.0 tok/s
Uptime— Worst comparable value
91.56%
Context
1M
Route
ionstream/fp4
Blended— Best comparable value
$1.508 / 1M
SiliconFlow
Speed— Best comparable value
12.91 s
TTFT— Worst comparable value
2.04 s
TPS— Best comparable value
46.0 tok/s
Uptime— Best comparable value
99.63%
Context
1M
Route
siliconflow/fp8
Blended— Worst comparable value
$2.0461 / 1M
DeepSeek V4 FlashWinner · SiliconFlow
Ionstream
Speed— Worst comparable value
46.17 s
TTFT— Worst comparable value
4.50 s
TPS— Worst comparable value
12.0 tok/s
Uptime— Best comparable value
98.38%
Context
1M
Route
ionstream/fp4
Blended— Worst comparable value
$0.1867 / 1M
SiliconFlow
Speed— Best comparable value
10.07 s
TTFT— Best comparable value
1.73 s
TPS— Best comparable value
60.0 tok/s
Uptime— Worst comparable value
97.71%
Context
1M
Route
siliconflow/fp8
Blended— Best comparable value
$0.18 / 1M
Gemma 4 26B A4BWinner · SiliconFlow
Ionstream
Speed— Worst comparable value
34.17 s
TTFT— Best comparable value
0.83 s
TPS— Worst comparable value
15.0 tok/s
Uptime— Worst comparable value
82.59%
Context
262.1K
Route
ionstream/bf16
Blended— Worst comparable value
$0.22 / 1M
SiliconFlow
Speed— Best comparable value
22.53 s
TTFT— Worst comparable value
1.69 s
TPS— Best comparable value
24.0 tok/s
Uptime— Best comparable value
99.15%
Context
262.1K
Route
siliconflow/fp8
Blended— Best comparable value
$0.2133 / 1M

A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated . Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.

Ionstream vs SiliconFlow analysis

How Ionstream and SiliconFlow compare for AI inference

Ionstream and SiliconFlow share 4 indexed text models, including GLM 5.2, DeepSeek V4 Pro, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Gemma 4 26B A4B. SiliconFlow has the stronger typical response-time result on the directly measured set.

Same-model speed evidence

4 shared models currently have complete response-start and output-speed measurements on both providers. The speed comparison uses per-model ratios before taking the median, so naturally faster model catalogs do not improve the result.

Token pricing on one workload

4 shared models have complete input and output prices on both providers. Prices use the same 1,000-input/500-output-token mix and are normalized to one million tokens for readability.

Catalog and deployment differences

Ionstream has 5 indexed models and lists 1 published server region; SiliconFlow has 36 models and lists 1 region. Verify data residency, privacy terms, limits, and production latency directly before choosing.