Skip to content

Multi-model provider comparison

MiniMax M3, Kimi K2.6 & GLM 5.2 Provider Comparison

This model set is designed for teams evaluating several current open-weight text models behind one provider relationship. The comparison requires complete coverage before a provider can win or receive a metric rank.

Choose 2–5 text models

Select the models one provider must offer. Results load as a server-rendered comparison page.

MiniMax M3Kimi K2.6GLM 5.2

All selected models receive equal weight: one 1,000-input/500-output-token request per model.

At a glance

Complete-provider winners

Every winner offers all selected models. The recommendation uses the single provider closest to the current ideal combination of lower total cost and shorter average response time.

Cost/speed balance

DeepInfra3/3 selected models

12.62 s average response

$0.00583 per model-set run · 1K input + 500 output per model

Cheapest complete provider

DeepInfra3/3 selected models

$1.2956 / 1M tokens

Blended 1K input + 500 output mix, averaged across 3 selected models

Fastest complete provider

Venice3/3 selected models

9.10 s

Average estimated 500-token response across 3 models

Showing 6 providers that offer every selected model

Providers compared across MiniMax M3, Kimi K2.6, GLM 5.2
ProviderSpeed measurementsReliability & location
Offers all 3 models · 6 providers
Provider
DeepInfraRecommended
Offers all 3 models
Speed measurements
Average 500-token response
12.62 s
Average response start
0.92 s
Average output speed
53.3 tok/s
Reliability & location
Lowest route uptime
98.82%
Headquarters
United States
Regions
N/a
Review DeepInfra routes for all selected models
ModelSelected routeToken prices500-token responseResponse startsOutput speedUptimeContext
MiniMax M3minimax/minimax-m3
deepinfra/bf16
Input
$0.3 / 1M tokens
Output
$1.2 / 1M tokens
12.89 s1.26 s43.0 tok/s99.70%524.3K
Kimi K2.6moonshotai/kimi-k2.6
deepinfra/fp4
Input
$0.75 / 1M tokens
Output
$3.5 / 1M tokens
6.34 s0.72 s89.0 tok/s99.83%262.1K
GLM 5.2z-ai/glm-5.2
deepinfra/fp4
Input
$0.93 / 1M tokens
Output
$3 / 1M tokens
18.64 s0.78 s28.0 tok/s98.82%1M
Provider
Offers all 3 models
Speed measurements
Average 500-token response
24.83 s
Average response start
1.62 s
Average output speed
21.7 tok/s
Reliability & location
Lowest route uptime
96.17%
Headquarters
United States
Regions
N/a
Review AtlasCloud routes for all selected models
ModelSelected routeToken prices500-token responseResponse startsOutput speedUptimeContext
MiniMax M3minimax/minimax-m3
atlas-cloud/fp8
Input
$0.3 / 1M tokens
Output
$1.2 / 1M tokens
24.78 s0.97 s21.0 tok/s96.17%524.3K
Kimi K2.6moonshotai/kimi-k2.6
atlas-cloud/int4
Input
$0.95 / 1M tokens
Output
$4 / 1M tokens
22.81 s1.98 s24.0 tok/s97.34%262.1K
GLM 5.2z-ai/glm-5.2
atlas-cloud/fp8
Input
$1.26 / 1M tokens
Output
$3.96 / 1M tokens
26.91 s1.91 s20.0 tok/s99.69%1M
Provider
Offers all 3 models
Speed measurements
Average 500-token response
18.84 s
Average response start
2.62 s
Average output speed
33.7 tok/s
Reliability & location
Lowest route uptime
97.04%
Headquarters
United States
Regions
N/a
Review NovitaAI routes for all selected models
ModelSelected routeToken prices500-token responseResponse startsOutput speedUptimeContext
MiniMax M3minimax/minimax-m3
novita/fp8
Input
$0.3 / 1M tokens
Output
$1.2 / 1M tokens
12.37 s2.17 s49.0 tok/s99.40%1M
Kimi K2.6moonshotai/kimi-k2.6
novita
Input
$0.8 / 1M tokens
Output
$3.4 / 1M tokens
21.48 s2.25 s26.0 tok/s99.62%262.1K
GLM 5.2z-ai/glm-5.2
novita/fp8
Input
$0.9744 / 1M tokens
Output
$3.06 / 1M tokens
22.65 s3.42 s26.0 tok/s97.04%1M
Provider
Offers all 3 models
Speed measurements
Average 500-token response
13.53 s
Average response start
0.76 s
Average output speed
45.3 tok/s
Reliability & location
Lowest route uptime
93.16%
Headquarters
United States
Regions
N/a
Review Parasail routes for all selected models
ModelSelected routeToken prices500-token responseResponse startsOutput speedUptimeContext
MiniMax M3minimax/minimax-m3
parasail/fp8
Input
$0.3 / 1M tokens
Output
$1.2 / 1M tokens
20.07 s0.84 s26.0 tok/s93.16%1M
Kimi K2.6moonshotai/kimi-k2.6
parasail/int4
Input
$0.75 / 1M tokens
Output
$3.5 / 1M tokens
8.21 s0.75 s67.0 tok/s99.44%262.1K
GLM 5.2z-ai/glm-5.2
parasail/fp4
Input
$1.4 / 1M tokens
Output
$4.4 / 1M tokens
12.31 s0.68 s43.0 tok/s100.00%262.1K
Provider
Offers all 3 models
Speed measurements
Average 500-token response
10.42 s
Average response start
0.65 s
Average output speed
64.0 tok/s
Reliability & location
Lowest route uptime
99.02%
Headquarters
United States
Regions
N/a
Review Together routes for all selected models
ModelSelected routeToken prices500-token responseResponse startsOutput speedUptimeContext
MiniMax M3minimax/minimax-m3
together
Input
$0.3 / 1M tokens
Output
$1.2 / 1M tokens
16.83 s0.70 s31.0 tok/s99.02%524.3K
Kimi K2.6moonshotai/kimi-k2.6
together
Input
$1.2 / 1M tokens
Output
$4.5 / 1M tokens
5.55 s0.55 s100.0 tok/s99.73%262.1K
GLM 5.2z-ai/glm-5.2
together
Input
$1.4 / 1M tokens
Output
$4.4 / 1M tokens
8.89 s0.70 s61.0 tok/s99.51%262.1K
Provider
Offers all 3 models
Speed measurements
Average 500-token response
9.10 s
Average response start
1.21 s
Average output speed
73.3 tok/s
Reliability & location
Lowest route uptime
Insufficient recent data
Headquarters
United States
Regions
United States
Review Venice routes for all selected models
ModelSelected routeToken prices500-token responseResponse startsOutput speedUptimeContext
MiniMax M3minimax/minimax-m3
venice/fp8
Input
$0.3 / 1M tokens
Output
$1.2 / 1M tokens
6.10 s1.29 s104.0 tok/s96.45%524.3K
Kimi K2.6moonshotai/kimi-k2.6
venice/int4
Input
$0.75 / 1M tokens
Output
$3.5 / 1M tokens
7.68 s1.02 s75.0 tok/sInsufficient recent data256K
GLM 5.2z-ai/glm-5.2
venice/fp8
Input
$1.4 / 1M tokens
Output
$4.4 / 1M tokens
13.51 s1.31 s41.0 tok/s98.71%1M

Only providers serving every selected model can receive a winner or metric rank. Each aggregate uses one equal 1,000-input/500-output-token request per model. Missing route measurements remain visible and are never estimated.

Comparison data fetched .

MiniMax M3, Kimi K2.6 & GLM 5.2 provider guide

How to choose one provider for MiniMax M3, Kimi K2.6 & GLM 5.2

6 providers currently offer the complete 3-model set: NovitaAI, Venice, AtlasCloud, Together, Parasail, DeepInfra. DeepInfra is closest to the current ideal combination of lower estimated model-set cost and shorter average response time.

Why complete model coverage comes first

A provider must expose MiniMax M3, Kimi K2.6, GLM 5.2 before it can receive a winner or rank. Providers missing part of the set remain available through the table toggle, but partial coverage is not compared against a complete provider portfolio.

How the recommendation is calculated

The comparison assumes one 1,000-input/500-output-token request to each model. Total cost is summed across the 3 selected routes, response time is averaged, and one recommendation is chosen as the provider closest to the normalized lower-cost and faster-response ideal.

Check exact routes and deployment requirements

Each provider row identifies the exact route selected for every model and lists alternative variants. Review quantization, context, regional hosting, privacy terms, rate limits, and current availability before standardizing this model set on one provider.