Start typing to search.
Ranks providers by estimated time to return 500 tokens, combining the wait for the first token with output speed.
SiliconFlow currently ranks first at 20.99 s via siliconflow/fp8.
| Rank | Provider / route | Estimated response time | Speed measurements | Endpoint details |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Provider / route SiliconFlow siliconflow/fp8 | Estimated response time20.99 s | Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
|
| #2 | Provider / route NovitaAI novita/fp8 | Estimated response time24.22 s | Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
|
| #3 | Provider / route AtlasCloud atlas-cloud/fp8 | Estimated response time127.64 s | Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
|
Endpoint data fetched .
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp endpoint guide
3 of 3 DeepSeek V3.2 Exp endpoints currently have the published data required for this ranking. SiliconFlow leads at 20.99 s via siliconflow/fp8. The table keeps unranked routes visible so missing measurements do not look like missing provider availability.
The fastest ranking estimates a 500-token answer by adding the recent median first-token wait to 500 divided by median output throughput. It represents an example complete response, not a guarantee for every prompt or request size.
NovitaAI currently ranks second at 24.22 s. Compare that gap with input and output price, response-start time, output speed, 30-minute uptime, context length, and the exact route before deciding whether first place is meaningful for your workload.
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp has 3 published provider options, and performance data is matched to each exact OpenRouter routing tag. Different quantization, context, regional deployment, or provider configuration can change price and behavior even when the underlying model name is identical.
