Start typing to search.
Ranks providers by estimated time to return 500 tokens, combining the wait for the first token with output speed.
Parasail currently ranks first at 14.81 s via parasail/fp8.
| Rank | Provider / route | Estimated response time | Speed measurements | Endpoint details |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Provider / route Parasail parasail/fp8 | Estimated response time14.81 s | Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
|
| #2 | Provider / route Nebius nebius/fp8 | Estimated response time19.14 s | Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
|
| #3 | Provider / route NovitaAI novita/bf16 | Estimated response time21.48 s | Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
|
| #4 | Provider / route DeepInfra deepinfra/fp8 | Estimated response time25.91 s | Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
|
| #5 | Provider / route Phala phala | Estimated response time64.93 s | Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
|
Endpoint data fetched .
Gemma 3 27B endpoint guide
5 of 5 Gemma 3 27B endpoints currently have the published data required for this ranking. Parasail leads at 14.81 s via parasail/fp8. The table keeps unranked routes visible so missing measurements do not look like missing provider availability.
The fastest ranking estimates a 500-token answer by adding the recent median first-token wait to 500 divided by median output throughput. It represents an example complete response, not a guarantee for every prompt or request size.
Nebius currently ranks second at 19.14 s. Compare that gap with input and output price, response-start time, output speed, 30-minute uptime, context length, and the exact route before deciding whether first place is meaningful for your workload.
Gemma 3 27B has 5 published provider options, and performance data is matched to each exact OpenRouter routing tag. Different quantization, context, regional deployment, or provider configuration can change price and behavior even when the underlying model name is identical.
