Start typing to search.
Ranks providers by estimated time to return 500 tokens, combining the wait for the first token with output speed.
Weights & Biases currently ranks first at 8.55 s via wandb/bf16.
| Rank | Provider / route | Estimated response time | Speed measurements | Endpoint details |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Provider / route Weights & Biases wandb/bf16 | Estimated response time8.55 s | Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
|
| #2 | Provider / route DeepInfra deepinfra/turbo | Estimated response time18.13 s | Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
|
| #3 | Provider / route Amazon Bedrock amazon-bedrock | Estimated response time19.68 s | Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
|
Endpoint data fetched .
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct endpoint guide
3 of 3 Llama 3.1 70B Instruct endpoints currently have the published data required for this ranking. Weights & Biases leads at 8.55 s via wandb/bf16. The table keeps unranked routes visible so missing measurements do not look like missing provider availability.
The fastest ranking estimates a 500-token answer by adding the recent median first-token wait to 500 divided by median output throughput. It represents an example complete response, not a guarantee for every prompt or request size.
DeepInfra currently ranks second at 18.13 s. Compare that gap with input and output price, response-start time, output speed, 30-minute uptime, context length, and the exact route before deciding whether first place is meaningful for your workload.
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct has 3 published provider options, and performance data is matched to each exact OpenRouter routing tag. Different quantization, context, regional deployment, or provider configuration can change price and behavior even when the underlying model name is identical.
