Start typing to search.
Ranks providers by estimated time to return 500 tokens, combining the wait for the first token with output speed.
NovitaAI currently ranks first at 13.77 s via novita/fp8.
| Rank | Provider / route | Estimated response time | Speed measurements | Endpoint details |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Provider / route NovitaAI novita/fp8 | Estimated response time13.77 s | Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
|
| #2 | Provider / route Mistral mistral | Estimated response time18.28 s | Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
|
| #3 | Provider / route DeepInfra deepinfra/fp8 | Estimated response time22.16 s | Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
|
| #4 | Provider / route DekaLLM dekallm/fp8 | Estimated response time22.55 s | Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
|
Endpoint data fetched .
Mistral Nemo endpoint guide
4 of 4 Mistral Nemo endpoints currently have the published data required for this ranking. NovitaAI leads at 13.77 s via novita/fp8. The table keeps unranked routes visible so missing measurements do not look like missing provider availability.
The fastest ranking estimates a 500-token answer by adding the recent median first-token wait to 500 divided by median output throughput. It represents an example complete response, not a guarantee for every prompt or request size.
Mistral currently ranks second at 18.28 s. Compare that gap with input and output price, response-start time, output speed, 30-minute uptime, context length, and the exact route before deciding whether first place is meaningful for your workload.
Mistral Nemo has 4 published provider options, and performance data is matched to each exact OpenRouter routing tag. Different quantization, context, regional deployment, or provider configuration can change price and behavior even when the underlying model name is identical.
