Start typing to search.
Ranks providers by estimated time to return 500 tokens, combining the wait for the first token with output speed.
Mistral currently ranks first at 5.17 s via mistral.
| Rank | Provider / route | Estimated response time | Speed measurements | Endpoint details |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Provider / route Mistral mistral | Estimated response time5.17 s | Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
|
| #2 | Provider / route DeepInfra deepinfra/fp8 | Estimated response time11.49 s | Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
|
| #3 | Provider / route Venice venice/fp8 | Estimated response time14.02 s | Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
|
| #4 | Provider / route Parasail parasail/bf16 | Estimated response time21.20 s | Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
|
Endpoint data fetched .
Mistral Small 3.2 24B endpoint guide
4 of 4 Mistral Small 3.2 24B endpoints currently have the published data required for this ranking. Mistral leads at 5.17 s via mistral. The table keeps unranked routes visible so missing measurements do not look like missing provider availability.
The fastest ranking estimates a 500-token answer by adding the recent median first-token wait to 500 divided by median output throughput. It represents an example complete response, not a guarantee for every prompt or request size.
DeepInfra currently ranks second at 11.49 s. Compare that gap with input and output price, response-start time, output speed, 30-minute uptime, context length, and the exact route before deciding whether first place is meaningful for your workload.
Mistral Small 3.2 24B has 4 published provider options, and performance data is matched to each exact OpenRouter routing tag. Different quantization, context, regional deployment, or provider configuration can change price and behavior even when the underlying model name is identical.
