Start typing to search.
Ranks providers by estimated time to return 500 tokens, combining the wait for the first token with output speed.
Nebius currently ranks first at 4.80 s via nebius/fp8.
| Rank | Provider / route | Estimated response time | Speed measurements | Endpoint details |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Provider / route Nebius nebius/fp8 | Estimated response time4.80 s | Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
|
| #2 | Provider / route NovitaAI novita/fp4 | Estimated response time5.49 s | Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
|
| #3 | Provider / route DeepInfra deepinfra/fp4 | Estimated response time10.60 s | Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
|
Endpoint data fetched .
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B endpoint guide
3 of 3 Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B endpoints currently have the published data required for this ranking. Nebius leads at 4.80 s via nebius/fp8. The table keeps unranked routes visible so missing measurements do not look like missing provider availability.
The fastest ranking estimates a 500-token answer by adding the recent median first-token wait to 500 divided by median output throughput. It represents an example complete response, not a guarantee for every prompt or request size.
NovitaAI currently ranks second at 5.49 s. Compare that gap with input and output price, response-start time, output speed, 30-minute uptime, context length, and the exact route before deciding whether first place is meaningful for your workload.
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has 3 published provider options, and performance data is matched to each exact OpenRouter routing tag. Different quantization, context, regional deployment, or provider configuration can change price and behavior even when the underlying model name is identical.
