Start typing to search.
Ranks providers by estimated time to return 500 tokens, combining the wait for the first token with output speed.
DeepInfra currently ranks first at 14.15 s via deepinfra/bf16.
| Rank | Provider / route | Estimated response time | Speed measurements | Endpoint details |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Provider / route DeepInfra deepinfra/bf16 | Estimated response time14.15 s | Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
|
| #2 | Provider / route Nebius nebius/fp4 | Estimated response time30.84 s | Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
|
| #3 | Provider / route DekaLLM dekallm/fp8 | Estimated response time69.09 s | Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
|
| #4 | Provider / route DigitalOcean digitalocean | Estimated response time75.40 s | Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
|
Endpoint data fetched .
Nemotron 3 Super endpoint guide
4 of 4 Nemotron 3 Super endpoints currently have the published data required for this ranking. DeepInfra leads at 14.15 s via deepinfra/bf16. The table keeps unranked routes visible so missing measurements do not look like missing provider availability.
The fastest ranking estimates a 500-token answer by adding the recent median first-token wait to 500 divided by median output throughput. It represents an example complete response, not a guarantee for every prompt or request size.
Nebius currently ranks second at 30.84 s. Compare that gap with input and output price, response-start time, output speed, 30-minute uptime, context length, and the exact route before deciding whether first place is meaningful for your workload.
Nemotron 3 Super has 4 published provider options, and performance data is matched to each exact OpenRouter routing tag. Different quantization, context, regional deployment, or provider configuration can change price and behavior even when the underlying model name is identical.
