Start typing to search.
Ranks providers by estimated time to return 500 tokens, combining the wait for the first token with output speed.
Groq currently ranks first at 2.33 s via groq.
| Rank | Provider / route | Estimated response time | Speed measurements | Endpoint details |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Provider / route Groq groq | Estimated response time2.33 s | Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
|
| #2 | Provider / route Alibaba Cloud Int. alibaba | Estimated response time13.73 s | Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
|
| #3 | Provider / route DeepInfra deepinfra/fp8 | Estimated response time23.01 s | Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
|
| #4 | Provider / route Nebius nebius/base | Estimated response time24.50 s | Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
|
| #5 | Provider / route SiliconFlow siliconflow/fp8 | Estimated response time73.12 s | Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
|
Endpoint data fetched .
Qwen3 32B endpoint guide
5 of 5 Qwen3 32B endpoints currently have the published data required for this ranking. Groq leads at 2.33 s via groq. The table keeps unranked routes visible so missing measurements do not look like missing provider availability.
The fastest ranking estimates a 500-token answer by adding the recent median first-token wait to 500 divided by median output throughput. It represents an example complete response, not a guarantee for every prompt or request size.
Alibaba Cloud Int. currently ranks second at 13.73 s. Compare that gap with input and output price, response-start time, output speed, 30-minute uptime, context length, and the exact route before deciding whether first place is meaningful for your workload.
Qwen3 32B has 5 published provider options, and performance data is matched to each exact OpenRouter routing tag. Different quantization, context, regional deployment, or provider configuration can change price and behavior even when the underlying model name is identical.
