Start typing to search.
Ranks providers by the uptime OpenRouter measured during the latest 30-minute window.
Parasail currently ranks first at 99.84% via parasail/bf16.
| Rank | Provider / route | Uptime (last 30 min) | Speed measurements | Endpoint details |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Provider / route Parasail parasail/bf16 | Uptime (last 30 min)99.84% | Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
|
| #2 | Provider / route Together together | Uptime (last 30 min)99.82% | Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
|
| #3 | Provider / route Venice venice/fp8 | Uptime (last 30 min)99.70% | Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
|
| #4 | Provider / route SiliconFlow siliconflow/fp8 | Uptime (last 30 min)98.32% | Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
|
| — | Provider / route DeepInfra deepinfra/bf16 | Uptime (last 30 min)Insufficient recent data | Speed measurements
| Endpoint details
|
Endpoint data fetched .
Qwen3.5-9B endpoint guide
4 of 5 Qwen3.5-9B endpoints currently have the published data required for this ranking. Parasail leads at 99.84% via parasail/bf16. The table keeps unranked routes visible so missing measurements do not look like missing provider availability.
The reliability ranking uses the published 30-minute endpoint uptime measurement. This short operational window can reveal current instability, but it is not a service-level agreement or a substitute for longer-term availability monitoring.
Together currently ranks second at 99.82%. Compare that gap with input and output price, response-start time, output speed, 30-minute uptime, context length, and the exact route before deciding whether first place is meaningful for your workload.
Qwen3.5-9B has 5 published provider options, and performance data is matched to each exact OpenRouter routing tag. Different quantization, context, regional deployment, or provider configuration can change price and behavior even when the underlying model name is identical.
