Skip to content

Fastest Qwen3.6 27B Inference Providers

Ranks providers by estimated time to return 500 tokens, combining the wait for the first token with output speed.

Phala currently ranks first at 4.92 s via phala.

Provider options:
9
Ranked:
9
Metric:
Estimated response time

Fastest response endpoint ranking

Fastest Qwen3.6 27B Inference Providers
RankProvider / routeEstimated response timeSpeed measurementsEndpoint details
#1Provider / route
Phalaphala
Estimated response time4.92 sSpeed measurements
500-token response
4.92 s
Response starts
0.57 s
Output speed
115.0 tok/s
Endpoint details
Input price
$0.32 / 1M tokens
Output price
$2.7 / 1M tokens
Uptime (30 min)
99.03%
Context
262.1K
#2Provider / route
Venicevenice/fp8
Estimated response time7.13 sSpeed measurements
500-token response
7.13 s
Response starts
0.46 s
Output speed
75.0 tok/s
Endpoint details
Input price
$0.325 / 1M tokens
Output price
$3.25 / 1M tokens
Uptime (30 min)
99.76%
Context
256K
#3Provider / routeEstimated response time9.16 sSpeed measurements
500-token response
9.16 s
Response starts
0.83 s
Output speed
60.0 tok/s
Endpoint details
Input price
$0.45 / 1M tokens
Output price
$2.7 / 1M tokens
Uptime (30 min)
99.84%
Context
262.1K
#4Provider / route
DeepInfradeepinfra/fp8
Estimated response time10.98 sSpeed measurements
500-token response
10.98 s
Response starts
0.34 s
Output speed
47.0 tok/s
Endpoint details
Input price
$0.32 / 1M tokens
Output price
$3.2 / 1M tokens
Uptime (30 min)
99.62%
Context
262.1K
#5Provider / route
SiliconFlowsiliconflow/fp8
Estimated response time13.14 sSpeed measurements
500-token response
13.14 s
Response starts
1.24 s
Output speed
42.0 tok/s
Endpoint details
Input price
$0.3 / 1M tokens
Output price
$3.2 / 1M tokens
Uptime (30 min)
99.88%
Context
262.1K
#6Provider / route
Chuteschutes/fp8
Estimated response time13.73 sSpeed measurements
500-token response
13.73 s
Response starts
1.53 s
Output speed
41.0 tok/s
Endpoint details
Input price
$0.3 / 1M tokens
Output price
$2 / 1M tokens
Uptime (30 min)
98.40%
Context
262.1K
#7Provider / route
Morphmorph
Estimated response time15.19 sSpeed measurements
500-token response
15.19 s
Response starts
1.30 s
Output speed
36.0 tok/s
Endpoint details
Input price
$0.289 / 1M tokens
Output price
$2.4 / 1M tokens
Uptime (30 min)
97.32%
Context
131.1K
#8Provider / route
io.netio-net/fp8
Estimated response time15.26 sSpeed measurements
500-token response
15.26 s
Response starts
0.56 s
Output speed
34.0 tok/s
Endpoint details
Input price
$0.2822 / 1M tokens
Output price
$2.38 / 1M tokens
Uptime (30 min)
99.94%
Context
262.1K
#9Provider / route
Estimated response time62.74 sSpeed measurements
500-token response
62.74 s
Response starts
0.24 s
Output speed
8.0 tok/s
Endpoint details
Input price
$0.6 / 1M tokens
Output price
$3.6 / 1M tokens
Uptime (30 min)
100.00%
Context
262.1K

Endpoint data fetched .

Qwen3.6 27B endpoint guide

How to interpret the Fastest Qwen3.6 27B Inference Providers

9 of 9 Qwen3.6 27B endpoints currently have the published data required for this ranking. Phala leads at 4.92 s via phala. The table keeps unranked routes visible so missing measurements do not look like missing provider availability.

How complete response time is ranked

The fastest ranking estimates a 500-token answer by adding the recent median first-token wait to 500 divided by median output throughput. It represents an example complete response, not a guarantee for every prompt or request size.

Compare Phala with the next option

Venice currently ranks second at 7.13 s. Compare that gap with input and output price, response-start time, output speed, 30-minute uptime, context length, and the exact route before deciding whether first place is meaningful for your workload.

Use the route, not only the provider name

Qwen3.6 27B has 9 published provider options, and performance data is matched to each exact OpenRouter routing tag. Different quantization, context, regional deployment, or provider configuration can change price and behavior even when the underlying model name is identical.