Alibaba Cloud Int. vs CoreWeave: LLM provider comparison

At a glance

Metric winners

There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.

Fastest on shared models

ACAlibaba Cloud Int.

1.31× typical advantage

7 exact models with complete recent speed data

Lowest token cost

ACAlibaba Cloud Int.

$1.1085 / 1M

7 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix

Most models available

ACAlibaba Cloud Int.

50 models

Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities

Shared-model benchmark summary

Metric	ACAlibaba Cloud Int.☆☆☆☆☆(0)	CCoreWeave☆☆☆☆☆(0)
Speed	Alibaba Cloud Int.10.50 s	CoreWeave17.27 s
TTFT	Alibaba Cloud Int.0.97 s	CoreWeave0.35 s
TPS	Alibaba Cloud Int.58.0 tok/s	CoreWeave30.0 tok/s
Uptime	Alibaba Cloud Int.99.92%	CoreWeave99.98%
Blended	Alibaba Cloud Int.$1.1085 / 1M	CoreWeave$1.2024 / 1M

Model	ACAlibaba Cloud Int.☆☆☆☆☆(0)	CCoreWeave☆☆☆☆☆(0)
ZA GLM 5.2Winner · Alibaba Cloud Int.	Alibaba Cloud Int. Speed— Best comparable value 12.95 s TTFT— Best comparable value 1.33 s TPS— Best comparable value 43.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 99.91% Context 1M Route alibaba Blended— Best comparable value $1.416 / 1M	CoreWeave Speed— Worst comparable value 20.46 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 1.94 s TPS— Worst comparable value 27.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 99.96% Context 262.1K Route coreweave/fp4 Blended— Worst comparable value $2.3933 / 1M
Q Qwen3.6 27BWinner · Alibaba Cloud Int.	Alibaba Cloud Int. Speed— Best comparable value 14.42 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 0.91 s TPS— Best comparable value 37.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 99.91% Context 262.1K Route alibaba Blended— Best comparable value $1.2 / 1M	CoreWeave Speed— Worst comparable value 18.18 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.33 s TPS— Worst comparable value 28.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 100.00% Context 262.1K Route coreweave/fp8 Blended— Worst comparable value $1.6 / 1M
D DeepSeek V4 ProWinner · Alibaba Cloud Int.	Alibaba Cloud Int. Speed— Best comparable value 10.50 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 1.88 s TPS— Best comparable value 58.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 99.11% Context 1M Route alibaba Blended— Best comparable value $1.888 / 1M	CoreWeave Speed— Worst comparable value 64.00 s TTFT— Best comparable value 1.50 s TPS— Worst comparable value 8.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 98.59% Context 1M Route coreweave/fp8 Blended— Worst comparable value $2.32 / 1M
D DeepSeek V4 FlashWinner · Alibaba Cloud Int.	Alibaba Cloud Int. Speed— Best comparable value 8.02 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 0.97 s TPS— Best comparable value 71.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 99.93% Context 1M Route alibaba Blended— Best comparable value $0.1787 / 1M	CoreWeave Speed— Worst comparable value 17.27 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.60 s TPS— Worst comparable value 30.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 99.85% Context 1M Route coreweave/fp8 Blended— Worst comparable value $0.1867 / 1M
Q Qwen3.5-35B-A3BWinner · Alibaba Cloud Int.	Alibaba Cloud Int. Speed— Best comparable value 4.71 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 0.88 s TPS— Best comparable value 130.5 tok/s Uptime 100.00% Context 262.1K Route alibaba Blended— Best comparable value $0.5417 / 1M	CoreWeave Speed— Worst comparable value 4.86 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.35 s TPS— Worst comparable value 111.0 tok/s Uptime 100.00% Context 262.1K Route coreweave/fp8 Blended— Worst comparable value $0.5833 / 1M
Q Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Winner · CoreWeave	Alibaba Cloud Int. Speed— Best comparable value 6.28 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 0.32 s TPS— Best comparable value 84.0 tok/s Uptime 100.00% Context 131.1K Route alibaba Blended— Worst comparable value $0.26 / 1M	CoreWeave Speed— Worst comparable value 8.22 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.28 s TPS— Worst comparable value 63.0 tok/s Uptime 100.00% Context 262.1K Route coreweave/bf16 Blended— Best comparable value $0.1667 / 1M
Q Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BWinner · CoreWeave	Alibaba Cloud Int. Speed— Worst comparable value 12.10 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 1.90 s TPS— Worst comparable value 49.0 tok/s Uptime N/a Context 262.1K Route alibaba/opensource Blended— Worst comparable value $2.275 / 1M	CoreWeave Speed— Best comparable value 9.06 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.29 s TPS— Best comparable value 57.0 tok/s Uptime N/a Context 262.1K Route coreweave/bf16 Blended— Best comparable value $1.1667 / 1M

A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated Jul 24, 2026, 6:19 PM UTC. Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.