Skip to content

Same-model provider benchmark

Ambient vs StreamLake: LLM provider comparison

Compare Ambient and StreamLake on 3 exact shared text models. ProviderBench keeps speed, price, and catalog coverage separate so naturally faster model catalogs cannot distort the result.

Ambient

5 indexed models

Headquarters
N/a
Server regions
N/a
Model types
5 text

StreamLake

20 indexed models

Headquarters
China
Server regions
N/a
Model types
20 text

At a glance

Metric winners

There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.

Fastest on shared models

2.06× typical advantage

3 exact models with complete recent speed data

Lowest token cost

$0.6361 / 1M

3 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix

Most models available

20 models

Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities

Shared-model benchmark summary

MetricAmbient(0)StreamLake(0)
SpeedAmbient6.49 sStreamLake12.35 s
TTFTAmbient0.74 sStreamLake1.48 s
TPSAmbient87.0 tok/sStreamLake45.0 tok/s
PriceAmbient$1.3889 / 1MStreamLake$0.6361 / 1M
UptimeAmbient99.13%StreamLake99.64%
Green value Better comparable resultRed value Worse comparable result

Visual comparison

Price and performance charts

AmbientStreamLake
500-token response by shared model

Estimated seconds using recent median response-start and output-speed data. Lower is better.

Ambient has the lower typical same-model response ratio across 3 measured models.

Blended token price by shared model

USD per 1 million tokens using a 1,000-input/500-output mix. Lower is better.

StreamLake has the lower typical price ratio across 3 priced shared models.

Shared text models

3 exact models · newest first

ModelAmbient(0)StreamLake(0)
GLM 5.2Winner · StreamLake
Ambient
Price— Worst comparable value
$2.1667 / 1M
Speed— Best comparable value
5.63 s
TTFT— Best comparable value
0.94 s
TPS— Best comparable value
106.5 tok/s
Uptime— Worst comparable value
94.23%
Context
101.4K
Route
ambient/fp8
StreamLake
Price— Best comparable value
$0.5196 / 1M
Speed— Worst comparable value
12.35 s
TTFT— Worst comparable value
1.24 s
TPS— Worst comparable value
45.0 tok/s
Uptime— Best comparable value
99.83%
Context
1M
Route
streamlake/fp8
DeepSeek V4 FlashWinner · StreamLake
Ambient
Price— Worst comparable value
$0.6 / 1M
Speed— Worst comparable value
30.12 s
TTFT— Best comparable value
0.71 s
TPS— Worst comparable value
17.0 tok/s
Uptime— Best comparable value
99.13%
Context
1M
Route
ambient/fp4
StreamLake
Price— Best comparable value
$0.1288 / 1M
Speed— Best comparable value
11.50 s
TTFT— Worst comparable value
1.50 s
TPS— Best comparable value
50.0 tok/s
Uptime— Worst comparable value
98.68%
Context
1M
Route
streamlake/fp8
Kimi K2.5Winner · Ambient
Ambient
Price— Worst comparable value
$1.4 / 1M
Speed— Best comparable value
6.49 s
TTFT— Best comparable value
0.74 s
TPS— Best comparable value
87.0 tok/s
Uptime— Best comparable value
99.82%
Context
262.1K
Route
ambient/int4
StreamLake
Price— Best comparable value
$1.26 / 1M
Speed— Worst comparable value
13.38 s
TTFT— Worst comparable value
1.48 s
TPS— Worst comparable value
42.0 tok/s
Uptime— Worst comparable value
99.64%
Context
256K
Route
streamlake/fp8

A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated . Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.

Ambient vs StreamLake analysis

How Ambient and StreamLake compare for AI inference

Ambient and StreamLake share 3 indexed text models, including GLM 5.2, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Kimi K2.5. Ambient has the stronger typical response-time result on the directly measured set.

Same-model speed evidence

3 shared models currently have complete response-start and output-speed measurements on both providers. The speed comparison uses per-model ratios before taking the median, so naturally faster model catalogs do not improve the result.

Token pricing on one workload

3 shared models have complete input and output prices on both providers. Prices use the same 1,000-input/500-output-token mix and are normalized to one million tokens for readability.

Catalog and deployment differences

Ambient has 5 indexed models and lists no published server regions; StreamLake has 20 models and lists no regions. Verify data residency, privacy terms, limits, and production latency directly before choosing.