AtlasCloud vs Crusoe: LLM provider comparison

At a glance

Metric winners

There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.

Fastest on shared models

CCrusoe

1.13× typical advantage

3 exact models with complete recent speed data

Lowest token cost

CCrusoe

$1.4378 / 1M

3 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix

Most models available

AAtlasCloud

32 models

Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities

Shared-model benchmark summary

Metric	AAtlasCloud☆☆☆☆☆(0)	CCrusoe☆☆☆☆☆(0)
Speed	AtlasCloud14.30 s	Crusoe11.96 s
TTFT	AtlasCloud1.48 s	Crusoe0.39 s
TPS	AtlasCloud39.0 tok/s	Crusoe43.0 tok/s
Uptime	AtlasCloud99.57%	Crusoe99.58%
Blended	AtlasCloud$1.5178 / 1M	Crusoe$1.4378 / 1M

Model	AAtlasCloud☆☆☆☆☆(0)	CCrusoe☆☆☆☆☆(0)
M Kimi K2.6Winner · AtlasCloud	AtlasCloud Speed— Best comparable value 17.56 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 1.93 s TPS— Best comparable value 32.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 99.33% Context 262.1K Route atlas-cloud/int4 Blended— Worst comparable value $1.9667 / 1M	Crusoe Speed— Worst comparable value 34.64 s TTFT— Best comparable value 1.31 s TPS— Worst comparable value 15.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 56.00% Context 262.1K Route crusoe/bf16 Blended— Best comparable value $1.6333 / 1M
ZA GLM 5.1Winner · Crusoe	AtlasCloud Speed— Worst comparable value 14.30 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 1.48 s TPS— Worst comparable value 39.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 99.57% Context 202.8K Route atlas-cloud/fp8 Blended— Best comparable value $2.16 / 1M	Crusoe Speed— Best comparable value 5.89 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.39 s TPS— Best comparable value 91.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 100.00% Context 202.8K Route crusoe/fp8 Blended— Worst comparable value $2.2667 / 1M
Q Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Winner · Crusoe	AtlasCloud Speed— Worst comparable value 13.54 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 1.35 s TPS— Worst comparable value 41.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 99.85% Context 131.1K Route atlas-cloud/fp8 Blended— Worst comparable value $0.4267 / 1M	Crusoe Speed— Best comparable value 11.96 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.33 s TPS— Best comparable value 43.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 99.58% Context 262.1K Route crusoe/bf16 Blended— Best comparable value $0.4133 / 1M

A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated Jul 24, 2026, 6:19 PM UTC. Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.