Crusoe vs Parasail: LLM provider comparison

At a glance

Metric winners

There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.

Fastest on shared models

CCrusoe

1.17× typical advantage

5 exact models with complete recent speed data

Lowest token cost

CCrusoe

$0.9913 / 1M

5 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix

Most models available

PParasail

36 models

Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities

Shared-model benchmark summary

Metric	CCrusoe☆☆☆☆☆(0)	PParasail☆☆☆☆☆(0)
Speed	Crusoe14.59 s	Parasail17.06 s
TTFT	Crusoe0.70 s	Parasail0.93 s
TPS	Crusoe36.0 tok/s	Parasail31.0 tok/s
Uptime	Crusoe99.74%	Parasail96.36%
Blended	Crusoe$0.9913 / 1M	Parasail$0.9947 / 1M

Model	CCrusoe☆☆☆☆☆(0)	PParasail☆☆☆☆☆(0)
M Kimi K2.6Winner · Parasail	Crusoe Speed— Worst comparable value 34.64 s TTFT— Best comparable value 1.31 s TPS— Worst comparable value 15.0 tok/s Uptime 56.00% Context 262.1K Route crusoe/bf16 Blended— Best comparable value $1.6333 / 1M	Parasail Speed— Best comparable value 14.20 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 1.70 s TPS— Best comparable value 40.0 tok/s Uptime N/a Context 262.1K Route parasail/int4 Blended— Worst comparable value $1.6667 / 1M
ZA GLM 5.1Winner · Crusoe	Crusoe Speed— Best comparable value 5.89 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.39 s TPS— Best comparable value 91.0 tok/s Uptime 100.00% Context 202.8K Route crusoe/fp8 Blended— Best comparable value $2.2667 / 1M	Parasail Speed— Worst comparable value 7.82 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 0.87 s TPS— Worst comparable value 72.0 tok/s Uptime 100.00% Context 202.8K Route parasail/fp8 Blended— Worst comparable value $2.4 / 1M
G Gemma 4 31BWinner · Parasail	Crusoe Speed— Worst comparable value 84.17 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.83 s TPS— Worst comparable value 6.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 91.12% Context 262.1K Route crusoe Blended— Best comparable value $0.2267 / 1M	Parasail Speed— Best comparable value 35.84 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 2.51 s TPS— Best comparable value 15.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 88.61% Context 262.1K Route parasail/fp8 Blended— Worst comparable value $0.2333 / 1M
Q Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Winner · Crusoe	Crusoe Speed— Best comparable value 11.96 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.33 s TPS— Best comparable value 43.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 99.58% Context 262.1K Route crusoe/bf16 Blended— Worst comparable value $0.4133 / 1M	Parasail Speed— Worst comparable value 20.62 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 0.62 s TPS— Worst comparable value 25.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 100.00% Context 131.1K Route parasail/fp8 Blended— Best comparable value $0.36 / 1M
ML Llama 3.3 70B InstructWinner · Parasail	Crusoe Speed— Best comparable value 14.59 s TTFT— Best comparable value 0.70 s TPS— Best comparable value 36.0 tok/s Uptime— Best comparable value 99.91% Context 131.1K Route crusoe/bf16 Blended— Worst comparable value $0.4167 / 1M	Parasail Speed— Worst comparable value 17.06 s TTFT— Worst comparable value 0.93 s TPS— Worst comparable value 31.0 tok/s Uptime— Worst comparable value 92.72% Context 131.1K Route parasail/fp8 Blended— Best comparable value $0.3133 / 1M

A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated Jul 24, 2026, 6:19 PM UTC. Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.