Skip to content

Same-model provider benchmark

AtlasCloud vs Ionstream: LLM provider comparison

Compare AtlasCloud and Ionstream on 3 exact shared text models. ProviderBench keeps speed, price, and catalog coverage separate so naturally faster model catalogs cannot distort the result.

AtlasCloud

32 indexed models

Headquarters
United States
Server regions
N/a
Model types
27 text, 5 video

Ionstream

5 indexed models

Headquarters
United States
Server regions
United States
Model types
5 text

At a glance

Metric winners

There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.

Fastest on shared models

3.18× typical advantage

3 exact models with complete recent speed data

Lowest token cost

$1.3649 / 1M

3 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix

Most models available

32 models

Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities

Shared-model benchmark summary

MetricAtlasCloud(0)Ionstream(0)
SpeedAtlasCloud13.63 sIonstream43.38 s
TTFTAtlasCloud2.27 sIonstream1.72 s
TPSAtlasCloud44.0 tok/sIonstream12.0 tok/s
UptimeAtlasCloud98.70%Ionstream94.97%
BlendedAtlasCloud$1.5311 / 1MIonstream$1.3649 / 1M
Green value Better comparable resultRed value Worse comparable result

Visual comparison

Price and performance charts

AtlasCloudIonstream
500-token response by shared model

Estimated seconds using recent median response-start and output-speed data. Lower is better.

AtlasCloud has the lower typical same-model response ratio across 3 measured models.

Blended token price by shared model

USD per 1 million tokens using a 1,000-input/500-output mix. Lower is better.

Ionstream has the lower typical price ratio across 3 priced shared models.

Shared text models

3 exact models · newest first

ModelAtlasCloud(0)Ionstream(0)
GLM 5.2Winner · Ionstream
AtlasCloud
Speed— Worst comparable value
19.85 s
TTFT— Worst comparable value
3.19 s
TPS— Worst comparable value
30.0 tok/s
Uptime
99.33%
Context
1M
Route
atlas-cloud/fp8
Blended— Best comparable value
$2.16 / 1M
Ionstream
Speed— Best comparable value
12.96 s
TTFT— Best comparable value
1.33 s
TPS— Best comparable value
43.0 tok/s
Uptime
N/a
Context
1M
Route
ionstream/fp4
Blended— Worst comparable value
$2.4 / 1M
DeepSeek V4 ProWinner · AtlasCloud
AtlasCloud
Speed— Best comparable value
13.63 s
TTFT— Worst comparable value
2.27 s
TPS— Best comparable value
44.0 tok/s
Uptime— Best comparable value
97.55%
Context
1M
Route
atlas-cloud/fp4
Blended— Worst comparable value
$2.2467 / 1M
Ionstream
Speed— Worst comparable value
43.38 s
TTFT— Best comparable value
1.72 s
TPS— Worst comparable value
12.0 tok/s
Uptime— Worst comparable value
91.56%
Context
1M
Route
ionstream/fp4
Blended— Best comparable value
$1.508 / 1M
DeepSeek V4 FlashWinner · AtlasCloud
AtlasCloud
Speed— Best comparable value
9.19 s
TTFT— Best comparable value
1.26 s
TPS— Best comparable value
63.0 tok/s
Uptime— Best comparable value
99.86%
Context
1M
Route
atlas-cloud/fp4
Blended
$0.1867 / 1M
Ionstream
Speed— Worst comparable value
46.17 s
TTFT— Worst comparable value
4.50 s
TPS— Worst comparable value
12.0 tok/s
Uptime— Worst comparable value
98.38%
Context
1M
Route
ionstream/fp4
Blended
$0.1867 / 1M

A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated . Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.

AtlasCloud vs Ionstream analysis

How AtlasCloud and Ionstream compare for AI inference

AtlasCloud and Ionstream share 3 indexed text models, including GLM 5.2, DeepSeek V4 Pro, DeepSeek V4 Flash. AtlasCloud has the stronger typical response-time result on the directly measured set.

Same-model speed evidence

3 shared models currently have complete response-start and output-speed measurements on both providers. The speed comparison uses per-model ratios before taking the median, so naturally faster model catalogs do not improve the result.

Token pricing on one workload

3 shared models have complete input and output prices on both providers. Prices use the same 1,000-input/500-output-token mix and are normalized to one million tokens for readability.

Catalog and deployment differences

AtlasCloud has 32 indexed models and lists no published server regions; Ionstream has 5 models and lists 1 region. Verify data residency, privacy terms, limits, and production latency directly before choosing.