Skip to content
ProviderBench home

Same-model provider benchmark

Ionstream vs StreamLake: LLM provider comparison

Compare Ionstream and StreamLake on 3 exact shared text models. ProviderBench keeps speed, price, and catalog coverage separate so naturally faster model catalogs cannot distort the result.

Ionstream

3 indexed models

Headquarters
United States
Server regions
United States
Model types
3 text

StreamLake

20 indexed models

Headquarters
China
Server regions
N/a
Model types
20 text

At a glance

Metric winners

There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.

Fastest on shared models

Ionstream

1.40× typical advantage

3 exact models with complete recent speed data

Lowest token cost

StreamLake

$0.6255 / 1M

3 exact models using a 1K-input/500-output mix

Most models available

StreamLake

20 models

Complete catalog coverage across all indexed modalities

Shared-model benchmark summary

MetricIonstream(0)StreamLake(0)
SpeedIonstream9.60 sStreamLake16.75 s
TTFTIonstream0.83 sStreamLake2.04 s
TPSIonstream57.0 tok/sStreamLake34.0 tok/s
PriceIonstream$1.416 / 1MStreamLake$0.6255 / 1M
UptimeIonstream100.00%StreamLake98.63%
Green value Better comparable resultRed value Worse comparable result

Visual comparison

Price and performance charts

IonstreamStreamLake
500-token response by shared model

Estimated seconds using recent median response-start and output-speed data. Lower is better.

Ionstream has the lower typical same-model response ratio across 3 measured models.

Blended token price by shared model

USD per 1 million tokens using a 1,000-input/500-output mix. Lower is better.

StreamLake has the lower typical price ratio across 3 priced shared models.

Shared text models

3 exact models · newest first

ModelIonstream(0)StreamLake(0)
GLM 5.2Winner · StreamLake
Ionstream
Price— Worst comparable value
$2.4 / 1M
Speed— Best comparable value
9.60 s
TTFT— Best comparable value
0.83 s
TPS— Best comparable value
57.0 tok/s
Uptime— Best comparable value
100.00%
Context
1M
Route
ionstream/fp4
StreamLake
Price— Best comparable value
$0.5052 / 1M
Speed— Worst comparable value
16.75 s
TTFT— Worst comparable value
2.04 s
TPS— Worst comparable value
34.0 tok/s
Uptime— Worst comparable value
98.63%
Context
1M
Route
streamlake/fp8
DeepSeek V4 ProWinner · StreamLake
Ionstream
Price— Worst comparable value
$1.508 / 1M
Speed— Worst comparable value
21.01 s
TTFT— Best comparable value
1.01 s
TPS— Worst comparable value
25.0 tok/s
Uptime— Best comparable value
98.79%
Context
1M
Route
ionstream/fp4
StreamLake
Price— Best comparable value
$0.9512 / 1M
Speed— Best comparable value
18.26 s
TTFT— Worst comparable value
3.11 s
TPS— Best comparable value
33.0 tok/s
Uptime— Worst comparable value
97.72%
Context
1M
Route
streamlake/fp8
Qwen3 Coder NextWinner · Ionstream
Ionstream
Price— Best comparable value
$0.34 / 1M
Speed— Best comparable value
8.84 s
TTFT— Best comparable value
0.51 s
TPS— Best comparable value
60.0 tok/s
Uptime— Best comparable value
100.00%
Context
262.1K
Route
ionstream/fp8
StreamLake
Price— Worst comparable value
$0.42 / 1M
Speed— Worst comparable value
12.42 s
TTFT— Worst comparable value
1.30 s
TPS— Worst comparable value
45.0 tok/s
Uptime— Worst comparable value
99.85%
Context
256K
Route
streamlake

A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated . Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.

Ionstream vs StreamLake analysis

How Ionstream and StreamLake compare for AI inference

Ionstream and StreamLake share 3 indexed text models, including GLM 5.2, DeepSeek V4 Pro, Qwen3 Coder Next. Ionstream has the stronger typical response-time result on the directly measured set.

Same-model speed evidence

3 shared models currently have complete response-start and output-speed measurements on both providers. The speed comparison uses per-model ratios before taking the median, so naturally faster model catalogs do not improve the result.

Token pricing on one workload

3 shared models have complete input and output prices on both providers. Prices use the same 1,000-input/500-output-token mix and are normalized to one million tokens for readability.

Catalog and deployment differences

Ionstream has 3 indexed models and lists 1 published server region; StreamLake has 20 models and lists no regions. Verify data residency, privacy terms, limits, and production latency directly before choosing.

Related same-model benchmarks

Compare with other providers

Explore qualified alternatives with the most shared measured models. Recommendations include comparisons for both Ionstream and StreamLake.

Ionstream vs Alibaba Cloud Int.

3 shared model benchmarks

StreamLake vs NovitaAI

16 shared model benchmarks

Ionstream vs Parasail

3 shared model benchmarks

StreamLake vs AtlasCloud

14 shared model benchmarks

StreamLake vs DeepInfra

14 shared model benchmarks

StreamLake vs SiliconFlow

12 shared model benchmarks