Baseten
5 indexed models
- Headquarters
United States- Server regions
- N/a
- Model types
- 5 text
Same-model provider benchmark
Baseten vs Together: LLM provider comparison
Compare Baseten and Together on 4 exact shared text models. ProviderBench keeps speed, price, and catalog coverage separate so naturally faster model catalogs cannot distort the result.
Together
19 indexed models
- Headquarters
- United States
- Server regions
- N/a
- Model types
- 17 text, 2 transcription
At a glance
Metric winners
There is no overall score. Each winner answers one specific question using only directly comparable data.
Shared-model benchmark summary
| Metric | Baseten | Together |
|---|---|---|
| Typical 500-token response | 5.96 s | 8.79 s |
| Typical response start | 0.35 s | 0.55 s |
| Typical output speed | 89.0 tok/s | 61.0 tok/s |
| Blended token price | $1.73 / 1M | $1.83 / 1M |
| Typical route uptime | 99.98% | 93.72% |
Visual comparison
Price and performance charts
BasetenEstimated seconds using recent median response-start and output-speed data. Lower is better.
Baseten has the lower typical same-model response ratio across 4 measured models.
USD per 1 million tokens using a 1,000-input/500-output mix. Lower is better.
Baseten has the lower typical price ratio across 4 priced shared models.
| Model | Baseten | Together |
|---|---|---|
 GLM 5.2Winner · Baseten z-ai/glm-5.2 | Baseten
| Together
|
 DeepSeek V4 ProWinner · Baseten deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro | Baseten
| Together
|
 Kimi K2.6Winner · Together moonshotai/kimi-k2.6 | Baseten
| Together
|
 gpt-oss-120bWinner · Baseten openai/gpt-oss-120b | Baseten
| Together
|
A per-model winner combines blended price and estimated 500-token response time with equal proportional weight. Ties and rows missing either measurement receive no badge. Comparison data calculated . Values use one deterministic route per provider and model; missing measurements remain visible as N/a.
Baseten vs Together analysis
How Baseten and Together compare for AI inference
Baseten and Together share 4 indexed text models, including GLM 5.2, DeepSeek V4 Pro, Kimi K2.6, gpt-oss-120b. Baseten has the stronger typical response-time result on the directly measured set.
Same-model speed evidence
4 shared models currently have complete response-start and output-speed measurements on both providers. The speed comparison uses per-model ratios before taking the median, so naturally faster model catalogs do not improve the result.
Token pricing on one workload
4 shared models have complete input and output prices on both providers. Prices use the same 1,000-input/500-output-token mix and are normalized to one million tokens for readability.
Catalog and deployment differences
Baseten has 5 indexed models and lists no published server regions; Together has 19 models and lists no regions. Verify data residency, privacy terms, limits, and production latency directly before choosing.
Related same-model benchmarks
Compare with other providers
Explore qualified alternatives with the most shared measured models. Recommendations include comparisons for both Baseten and Together.
